Quality of birth care in maternity hospitals of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

• Autor(a) principal: d'Orsi, Eleonora
• Data de Publicação: 2005
• Outros Autores: Chor, Dóra, Giffin, Karen, Angulo-Tuesta, Antonia, Barbosa, Gisele Peixoto, Gama, Andrea de Souza, Reis, Ana Cristina, Hartz, Zulmira
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
• Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31917
• topic: Saúde materno-infantil; Qualidade de serviços de saúde; Parto; Parto obstétrico; Parto normal; Pesquisa sobre serviços de saúde; Maternal and child health; Quality of health care; Delivery; obstetric; Natural childbirth; Health services research

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of birth care based on the World Health Organization guidelines. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out in a public and a private maternity hospitals contracted by the Brazilian Health System in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from October 1998 to March 1999. The sample comprised 461 women in the public maternity hospital (230 vaginal deliveries and 231 Cesarean sections) and 448 women in the private one (224 vaginal deliveries and 224 Cesarean sections). Data was collected through interviews with puerperal women and review of medical records. A summarization score of quality of delivery care was constructed. RESULTS: There was low frequency of practices that should be encouraged, such as having an accompanying person (1% in the private hospital for both vaginal delivery and C-sections), freedom of movements throughout labor (9.6% of C-sections in the public hospital and 9.9% of vaginal deliveries in the private hospital) and breastfeeding in the delivery room (6.9% of C-sections in the public hospital and 8.0% of C-sections in the private hospital). There was a high frequency of known harmful practices such as enema administration (38.4%); routine pubic shaving; routine intravenous infusion (88.8%); routine use of oxytocin (64.4%), strict bed rest throughout labor (90.1%) and routine supine position in labor (98.7%) in vaginal deliveries. The best summarizing scores were seen in the public maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The two maternity hospitals have a high frequency of interventions during birth care. In spite of providing care to higher risk pregnant women, the public maternity hospital has a less interventionist profile than the private one. Procedures carried out on a routine basis should be pondered based on evidence of their benefits.