Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho,Tiago Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Ferré,Felipe, Campos Neto,Orozimbo Henriques, Acurcio,Francisco de Assis, Cherchiglia,Mariângela Leal, Andrade,Eli Iola Gurgel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000500808
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors related to the granting of preliminary court orders [injunctions] in drug litigations. METHODS A retrospective descriptive study of drug lawsuits in the State of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil, was conducted from October 1999 to 2009. The database consists of 6,112 lawsuits, out of which 6,044 had motions for injunctions and 5,167 included the requisition of drugs. Those with more than one beneficiary were excluded, which totaled 5,072 examined suits. The variables for complete, partial, and suppressed motions were treated as dependent and assessed in relation to those that were independent – lawsuits (year, type, legal representation, defendant, court in which it was filed, adjudication time), drugs (level five of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification), and diseases (chapter of the International Classification of Diseases). Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS Out of the 5,072 lawsuits with injunctions, 4,184 (82.5%) had the injunctions granted. Granting varied from 95.8% of the total lawsuits in 2004 to 76.9% in 2008. Where there was legal representation, granting exceeded 80.0% and in lawsuits without representation, it did not exceed 66.9%. In public civil actions (89.1%), granting was higher relative to ordinary lawsuits (82.8%) and injunctions (80.1%). Federal courts granted only 68.6% of the injunctions, while the state courts granted 84.8%. Diseases of the digestive system and neoplasms received up to 87.0% in granting, while diseases of the nervous system, mental and behavioral disorders, and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue received granting below 78.6% and showed a high proportion of suspended injunctions (10.9%). Injunctions involving paroxetine, somatropin, and ferrous sulfate drugs were all granted, while less than 54.0% of those involving escitalopram, sodium diclofenac, and nortriptyline were granted. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in the granting of injunctions, depending on the procedural and clinical variances. Important trends in the pattern of judicial action were observed, particularly, in the reduced granting [of injunctions] over the period.
id USP-23_738b54f507daeb511bcae045b6fef97b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102014000500808
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas GeraisPharmaceutical Preparations, supply & distributionPharmaceutical Services, legislation & jurisprudenceJudicial DecisionsPatient Advocacy OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors related to the granting of preliminary court orders [injunctions] in drug litigations. METHODS A retrospective descriptive study of drug lawsuits in the State of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil, was conducted from October 1999 to 2009. The database consists of 6,112 lawsuits, out of which 6,044 had motions for injunctions and 5,167 included the requisition of drugs. Those with more than one beneficiary were excluded, which totaled 5,072 examined suits. The variables for complete, partial, and suppressed motions were treated as dependent and assessed in relation to those that were independent – lawsuits (year, type, legal representation, defendant, court in which it was filed, adjudication time), drugs (level five of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification), and diseases (chapter of the International Classification of Diseases). Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS Out of the 5,072 lawsuits with injunctions, 4,184 (82.5%) had the injunctions granted. Granting varied from 95.8% of the total lawsuits in 2004 to 76.9% in 2008. Where there was legal representation, granting exceeded 80.0% and in lawsuits without representation, it did not exceed 66.9%. In public civil actions (89.1%), granting was higher relative to ordinary lawsuits (82.8%) and injunctions (80.1%). Federal courts granted only 68.6% of the injunctions, while the state courts granted 84.8%. Diseases of the digestive system and neoplasms received up to 87.0% in granting, while diseases of the nervous system, mental and behavioral disorders, and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue received granting below 78.6% and showed a high proportion of suspended injunctions (10.9%). Injunctions involving paroxetine, somatropin, and ferrous sulfate drugs were all granted, while less than 54.0% of those involving escitalopram, sodium diclofenac, and nortriptyline were granted. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in the granting of injunctions, depending on the procedural and clinical variances. Important trends in the pattern of judicial action were observed, particularly, in the reduced granting [of injunctions] over the period. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000500808Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.5 2014reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005286info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho,Tiago LopesFerré,FelipeCampos Neto,Orozimbo HenriquesAcurcio,Francisco de AssisCherchiglia,Mariângela LealAndrade,Eli Iola Gurgeleng2014-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102014000500808Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-10-27T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
title Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
spellingShingle Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
Coelho,Tiago Lopes
Pharmaceutical Preparations, supply & distribution
Pharmaceutical Services, legislation & jurisprudence
Judicial Decisions
Patient Advocacy
title_short Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
title_full Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
title_fullStr Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
title_full_unstemmed Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
title_sort Legal and health variations in drug litigation injunctions granted in Minas Gerais
author Coelho,Tiago Lopes
author_facet Coelho,Tiago Lopes
Ferré,Felipe
Campos Neto,Orozimbo Henriques
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
Cherchiglia,Mariângela Leal
Andrade,Eli Iola Gurgel
author_role author
author2 Ferré,Felipe
Campos Neto,Orozimbo Henriques
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
Cherchiglia,Mariângela Leal
Andrade,Eli Iola Gurgel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho,Tiago Lopes
Ferré,Felipe
Campos Neto,Orozimbo Henriques
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
Cherchiglia,Mariângela Leal
Andrade,Eli Iola Gurgel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pharmaceutical Preparations, supply & distribution
Pharmaceutical Services, legislation & jurisprudence
Judicial Decisions
Patient Advocacy
topic Pharmaceutical Preparations, supply & distribution
Pharmaceutical Services, legislation & jurisprudence
Judicial Decisions
Patient Advocacy
description OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors related to the granting of preliminary court orders [injunctions] in drug litigations. METHODS A retrospective descriptive study of drug lawsuits in the State of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil, was conducted from October 1999 to 2009. The database consists of 6,112 lawsuits, out of which 6,044 had motions for injunctions and 5,167 included the requisition of drugs. Those with more than one beneficiary were excluded, which totaled 5,072 examined suits. The variables for complete, partial, and suppressed motions were treated as dependent and assessed in relation to those that were independent – lawsuits (year, type, legal representation, defendant, court in which it was filed, adjudication time), drugs (level five of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification), and diseases (chapter of the International Classification of Diseases). Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS Out of the 5,072 lawsuits with injunctions, 4,184 (82.5%) had the injunctions granted. Granting varied from 95.8% of the total lawsuits in 2004 to 76.9% in 2008. Where there was legal representation, granting exceeded 80.0% and in lawsuits without representation, it did not exceed 66.9%. In public civil actions (89.1%), granting was higher relative to ordinary lawsuits (82.8%) and injunctions (80.1%). Federal courts granted only 68.6% of the injunctions, while the state courts granted 84.8%. Diseases of the digestive system and neoplasms received up to 87.0% in granting, while diseases of the nervous system, mental and behavioral disorders, and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue received granting below 78.6% and showed a high proportion of suspended injunctions (10.9%). Injunctions involving paroxetine, somatropin, and ferrous sulfate drugs were all granted, while less than 54.0% of those involving escitalopram, sodium diclofenac, and nortriptyline were granted. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in the granting of injunctions, depending on the procedural and clinical variances. Important trends in the pattern of judicial action were observed, particularly, in the reduced granting [of injunctions] over the period.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000500808
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000500808
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005286
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.5 2014
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936502821257216