Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Eunice Pinho de Castro
Data de Publicação: 1986
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23380
Resumo: It is presented two sampling methods for selecting a sample of children of a given age range, living in a geographical area of interest, to estimate vaccinal coverage: the R.H. Henderson and T. Sundaresan method, the Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods of National Public Health School method. A third method of selection is then proposed. The geographical area of interest is divided into parts which are used as primary sampling units (PSU's). First method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to the population living in the PSU; a starting point ("household") is selected by random selection within each PSU selected: selection of 7 children from within each of the PSU's, begins with the starting household, and then continues to the next nearest household until a total of 7 individuals is obtained (all individuals of the appropriate age living in the last household falling within the sample are included). Second method: the first stage is like that of the first method; previously to the second stage there is a census in each PSU selected in order to prepare a list of all dwelling units where one or more children live; applying systematic selection, 7 dwelling units are selected from this list. Third method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to Di (number of dwelling units in the PSU i) given by the Census; the dwelling units in the selected PSU are considered in a fixed order; at the second stage, each selected PSU is exhaustively visited, according to the order of the dwelling units; during this visit, only the dwelling units where one or more children live are listed; to these dwellings a systematic selection is applied, the interval Di/b of which is such that with these two stages there is an equal probability selection method (epsem); the over-all sampling fraction is n/^C with n given by 210/a% (a%is the expected response rate) and ^C is the estimate of the number of children living in the area of interest during the survey. The probability of selection of each individual of the appropriate age, in the first method, depends on the ratio Pi/Di'(Pi is the population of the i th PSU; Di' is the number of dwelling units in this PSU, during the survey), it depends too on the number of dwelling units with no children living in them, situated between two dwellings with children, as well as on the number of children living in each dwelling unit. When the ratios Pi/Di' are equal for all the PSU's, and the second item has the same values for the whole area of interest and this happens also with the third item, we shall then have a selection method of equal probability (epsem) to the first. The second method is a probability one, since Pi/D'ci can be known for all the PSU's of the area of interest (D'ci is the number of dweling units with children living in, during the survey; this method will be an equal probability selection when that ratio is the same for all PSU's. The third method is an epsem, independently of the values of Di. The first method is used by the Expanded Programme on Immunization and is considered effective, simple and inexpensive. The second and third present some changes and consist of alternative methods which attempt to diminish the mean square error of the estimator, although they are less simple and more expensive than the first one. The third requires more data than the second. Since the estimator used to estimate the vaccinal coverage presupposes self-weighing samples, the principal purpose of the third method was to provid a method which will be epsem, i.e., will give to every child of the age group studied, living in the area of interest, equal probability of selection.
id USP-23_7c41fbb87cb8e29036982fb15b82599b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/23380
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage Métodos de amostragem para estimação da cobertura vacinal VacinaçãoTécnica de estimaçãoAmostragemProbabilidadeVaccinationEstimation technicsSampling studiesProbability It is presented two sampling methods for selecting a sample of children of a given age range, living in a geographical area of interest, to estimate vaccinal coverage: the R.H. Henderson and T. Sundaresan method, the Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods of National Public Health School method. A third method of selection is then proposed. The geographical area of interest is divided into parts which are used as primary sampling units (PSU's). First method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to the population living in the PSU; a starting point ("household") is selected by random selection within each PSU selected: selection of 7 children from within each of the PSU's, begins with the starting household, and then continues to the next nearest household until a total of 7 individuals is obtained (all individuals of the appropriate age living in the last household falling within the sample are included). Second method: the first stage is like that of the first method; previously to the second stage there is a census in each PSU selected in order to prepare a list of all dwelling units where one or more children live; applying systematic selection, 7 dwelling units are selected from this list. Third method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to Di (number of dwelling units in the PSU i) given by the Census; the dwelling units in the selected PSU are considered in a fixed order; at the second stage, each selected PSU is exhaustively visited, according to the order of the dwelling units; during this visit, only the dwelling units where one or more children live are listed; to these dwellings a systematic selection is applied, the interval Di/b of which is such that with these two stages there is an equal probability selection method (epsem); the over-all sampling fraction is n/^C with n given by 210/a% (a%is the expected response rate) and ^C is the estimate of the number of children living in the area of interest during the survey. The probability of selection of each individual of the appropriate age, in the first method, depends on the ratio Pi/Di'(Pi is the population of the i th PSU; Di' is the number of dwelling units in this PSU, during the survey), it depends too on the number of dwelling units with no children living in them, situated between two dwellings with children, as well as on the number of children living in each dwelling unit. When the ratios Pi/Di' are equal for all the PSU's, and the second item has the same values for the whole area of interest and this happens also with the third item, we shall then have a selection method of equal probability (epsem) to the first. The second method is a probability one, since Pi/D'ci can be known for all the PSU's of the area of interest (D'ci is the number of dweling units with children living in, during the survey; this method will be an equal probability selection when that ratio is the same for all PSU's. The third method is an epsem, independently of the values of Di. The first method is used by the Expanded Programme on Immunization and is considered effective, simple and inexpensive. The second and third present some changes and consist of alternative methods which attempt to diminish the mean square error of the estimator, although they are less simple and more expensive than the first one. The third requires more data than the second. Since the estimator used to estimate the vaccinal coverage presupposes self-weighing samples, the principal purpose of the third method was to provid a method which will be epsem, i.e., will give to every child of the age group studied, living in the area of interest, equal probability of selection. Apresentam-se sucintamente dois métodos de amostragem que visam a seleção de uma amostra de crianças de fixada faixa de idade, residentes em determinada área geográfica de interesse, para estimação de cobertura vacinal: o método de R.H. Henderson e T. Sundaresan, o método do Departamento de Epidemiologia e de Métodos Quantitativos em Saúde da Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Um terceiro método de amostragem é proposto. O primeiro método apresentado (Henderson e Sundaresan) é empregado no Programa Ampliado de Imunização e nesse programa é considerado eficiente, simples e não dispendioso. O segundo e o novo método, que apresentam modificações do primeiro, constituindo alternativas deste, visam diminuir o erro quadrático médio nas estimativas, conquanto sejam menos simples e mais dispendiosos que aquele. Visto que, na estimação da cobertura vacinal, o estimador empregado pressupõe amostra autoponderada, a preocupação maior do método aqui proposto foi a de proporcionar uma amostragem segundo a qual se tenha equiprobabilidade de seleção para qualquer criança do grupo etário estudado residente na área de interesse, independentemente de qualquer condição. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública1986-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/2338010.1590/S0034-89101986000500007Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 No. 5 (1986); 377-384 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 Núm. 5 (1986); 377-384 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 20 n. 5 (1986); 377-384 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23380/25411Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Eunice Pinho de Castro2012-05-28T16:25:26Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/23380Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-05-28T16:25:26Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
Métodos de amostragem para estimação da cobertura vacinal
title Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
spellingShingle Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
Silva, Eunice Pinho de Castro
Vacinação
Técnica de estimação
Amostragem
Probabilidade
Vaccination
Estimation technics
Sampling studies
Probability
title_short Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
title_full Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
title_fullStr Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
title_full_unstemmed Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
title_sort Methods of sample selection for estimates of vaccination coverage
author Silva, Eunice Pinho de Castro
author_facet Silva, Eunice Pinho de Castro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Eunice Pinho de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vacinação
Técnica de estimação
Amostragem
Probabilidade
Vaccination
Estimation technics
Sampling studies
Probability
topic Vacinação
Técnica de estimação
Amostragem
Probabilidade
Vaccination
Estimation technics
Sampling studies
Probability
description It is presented two sampling methods for selecting a sample of children of a given age range, living in a geographical area of interest, to estimate vaccinal coverage: the R.H. Henderson and T. Sundaresan method, the Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods of National Public Health School method. A third method of selection is then proposed. The geographical area of interest is divided into parts which are used as primary sampling units (PSU's). First method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to the population living in the PSU; a starting point ("household") is selected by random selection within each PSU selected: selection of 7 children from within each of the PSU's, begins with the starting household, and then continues to the next nearest household until a total of 7 individuals is obtained (all individuals of the appropriate age living in the last household falling within the sample are included). Second method: the first stage is like that of the first method; previously to the second stage there is a census in each PSU selected in order to prepare a list of all dwelling units where one or more children live; applying systematic selection, 7 dwelling units are selected from this list. Third method: 30 PSU's are selected with probability proportional to Di (number of dwelling units in the PSU i) given by the Census; the dwelling units in the selected PSU are considered in a fixed order; at the second stage, each selected PSU is exhaustively visited, according to the order of the dwelling units; during this visit, only the dwelling units where one or more children live are listed; to these dwellings a systematic selection is applied, the interval Di/b of which is such that with these two stages there is an equal probability selection method (epsem); the over-all sampling fraction is n/^C with n given by 210/a% (a%is the expected response rate) and ^C is the estimate of the number of children living in the area of interest during the survey. The probability of selection of each individual of the appropriate age, in the first method, depends on the ratio Pi/Di'(Pi is the population of the i th PSU; Di' is the number of dwelling units in this PSU, during the survey), it depends too on the number of dwelling units with no children living in them, situated between two dwellings with children, as well as on the number of children living in each dwelling unit. When the ratios Pi/Di' are equal for all the PSU's, and the second item has the same values for the whole area of interest and this happens also with the third item, we shall then have a selection method of equal probability (epsem) to the first. The second method is a probability one, since Pi/D'ci can be known for all the PSU's of the area of interest (D'ci is the number of dweling units with children living in, during the survey; this method will be an equal probability selection when that ratio is the same for all PSU's. The third method is an epsem, independently of the values of Di. The first method is used by the Expanded Programme on Immunization and is considered effective, simple and inexpensive. The second and third present some changes and consist of alternative methods which attempt to diminish the mean square error of the estimator, although they are less simple and more expensive than the first one. The third requires more data than the second. Since the estimator used to estimate the vaccinal coverage presupposes self-weighing samples, the principal purpose of the third method was to provid a method which will be epsem, i.e., will give to every child of the age group studied, living in the area of interest, equal probability of selection.
publishDate 1986
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1986-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23380
10.1590/S0034-89101986000500007
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23380
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89101986000500007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23380/25411
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 No. 5 (1986); 377-384
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 Núm. 5 (1986); 377-384
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 20 n. 5 (1986); 377-384
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221773238632448