Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arroz, Jorge Alexandre Harrison
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Chirrute, Francisco, Mendis, Chandana, Chande, Marta Honesta, Kollhoff, Veronique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To assess the ownership and use of mosquito nets in 2014, in Mozambique. METHODS This observational and cross-sectional study assessed, in February and March 2015, 69 districts (nine of 11 provinces of Mozambique) that have benefited from the mass distribution of mosquito nets. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling methodology was used. Each locality was denominated supervision area. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling opts for a minimum of 19 households (in this case, we decided for a minimum of 100 households per district) from each supervision area to assess an indicator (in this case, two indicators were assessed: ownership and use of mosquito nets). Two questions guided the research: a) received a mosquito net; b) used a mosquito net the night before. RESULTS A total of 6,725 households were assessed. Eighty three percent of them had received mosquito nets in the campaign. Of the 6,232 respondents, 82.0% said they used mosquito nets the night before. The districts of the provinces with low coverage of ownership and use were Tete (69.5% and 60.0%, respectively), Zambezia (79.0% and 60.0%, respectively), and Gaza (81.6% and 70.7%, respectively). The largest coverage of ownership and use were observed in the districts of Nampula (96.7% and 93.8%, respectively) and Niassa (86.0% and 85.4% respectively). CONCLUSIONS In the districts assessed, the progression of ownership and use of mosquito nets is satisfactory. Nampula and Niassa are the only provinces where ownership and use are at desired levels.
id USP-23_961fb3c6ca0d34cedaf923115d6158c1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/126626
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in MozambiqueAvaliação sobre a posse e uso de redes mosquiteiras em MoçambiqueOBJECTIVE To assess the ownership and use of mosquito nets in 2014, in Mozambique. METHODS This observational and cross-sectional study assessed, in February and March 2015, 69 districts (nine of 11 provinces of Mozambique) that have benefited from the mass distribution of mosquito nets. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling methodology was used. Each locality was denominated supervision area. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling opts for a minimum of 19 households (in this case, we decided for a minimum of 100 households per district) from each supervision area to assess an indicator (in this case, two indicators were assessed: ownership and use of mosquito nets). Two questions guided the research: a) received a mosquito net; b) used a mosquito net the night before. RESULTS A total of 6,725 households were assessed. Eighty three percent of them had received mosquito nets in the campaign. Of the 6,232 respondents, 82.0% said they used mosquito nets the night before. The districts of the provinces with low coverage of ownership and use were Tete (69.5% and 60.0%, respectively), Zambezia (79.0% and 60.0%, respectively), and Gaza (81.6% and 70.7%, respectively). The largest coverage of ownership and use were observed in the districts of Nampula (96.7% and 93.8%, respectively) and Niassa (86.0% and 85.4% respectively). CONCLUSIONS In the districts assessed, the progression of ownership and use of mosquito nets is satisfactory. Nampula and Niassa are the only provinces where ownership and use are at desired levels.OBJECTIVO Avaliar a posse e o uso das redes mosquiteiras no ano de 2014 em Moçambique. MÉTODOS Este estudo observacional transversal avaliou, em fevereiro e março de 2015, 68 distritos (nove das 11 províncias de Moçambique) que se beneficiaram da distribuição de redes em massa. Usou-se a metodologia Lot Quality Assurance Sampling. Cada localidade foi designada de área de supervisão. O Lot Quality Assurance Sampling opta por um mínimo de 19 agregados familiares (neste caso decidiu-se um mínimo de 100 agregados familiares por distrito) de cada área de supervisão, a fim de avaliar um indicador (neste caso dois indicadores foram avaliados: posse e uso de redes mosquiteiras). Duas perguntas nortearam a pesquisa: a) recebeu rede; b) usou rede na noite anterior. RESULTADOS Foram avaliados 6.725 agregados familiares . Desses, 83,0% tinham recebido redes na campanha. Dos 6.232 inqueridos, 82,0% disseram que usaram na noite anterior. As províncias com distritos com menores coberturas de posse e uso foram Tete (69,5% e 60,0%, respectivamente), Zambézia (79,0% e 60,0%, respectivamente) e Gaza (81,6% e 70,7%, respectivamente). As maiores coberturas de posse e uso foram observadas nos distritos de Nampula (96,7% e 93,8%, respectivamente) e Niassa (86,0% e 85,4%, respectivamente). CONCLUSÕES Nos distritos avaliados, a progressão para a posse e uso de redes mosquiteiras é satisfatória. Nampula e Niassa são as únicas províncias onde a posse e o uso estão em níveis desejados.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/12662610.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006335Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 50 (2016); 67Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 50 (2016); 67Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 50 (2016); 671518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626/123644https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626/123645Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArroz, Jorge Alexandre HarrisonChirrute, FranciscoMendis, ChandanaChande, Marta HonestaKollhoff, Veronique2018-02-26T17:09:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/126626Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2018-02-26T17:09:54Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
Avaliação sobre a posse e uso de redes mosquiteiras em Moçambique
title Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
spellingShingle Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
Arroz, Jorge Alexandre Harrison
title_short Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
title_full Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
title_fullStr Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
title_full_unstemmed Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
title_sort Assessment on the ownership and use of mosquito nets in Mozambique
author Arroz, Jorge Alexandre Harrison
author_facet Arroz, Jorge Alexandre Harrison
Chirrute, Francisco
Mendis, Chandana
Chande, Marta Honesta
Kollhoff, Veronique
author_role author
author2 Chirrute, Francisco
Mendis, Chandana
Chande, Marta Honesta
Kollhoff, Veronique
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arroz, Jorge Alexandre Harrison
Chirrute, Francisco
Mendis, Chandana
Chande, Marta Honesta
Kollhoff, Veronique
description OBJECTIVE To assess the ownership and use of mosquito nets in 2014, in Mozambique. METHODS This observational and cross-sectional study assessed, in February and March 2015, 69 districts (nine of 11 provinces of Mozambique) that have benefited from the mass distribution of mosquito nets. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling methodology was used. Each locality was denominated supervision area. The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling opts for a minimum of 19 households (in this case, we decided for a minimum of 100 households per district) from each supervision area to assess an indicator (in this case, two indicators were assessed: ownership and use of mosquito nets). Two questions guided the research: a) received a mosquito net; b) used a mosquito net the night before. RESULTS A total of 6,725 households were assessed. Eighty three percent of them had received mosquito nets in the campaign. Of the 6,232 respondents, 82.0% said they used mosquito nets the night before. The districts of the provinces with low coverage of ownership and use were Tete (69.5% and 60.0%, respectively), Zambezia (79.0% and 60.0%, respectively), and Gaza (81.6% and 70.7%, respectively). The largest coverage of ownership and use were observed in the districts of Nampula (96.7% and 93.8%, respectively) and Niassa (86.0% and 85.4% respectively). CONCLUSIONS In the districts assessed, the progression of ownership and use of mosquito nets is satisfactory. Nampula and Niassa are the only provinces where ownership and use are at desired levels.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626
10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006335
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006335
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626/123644
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/126626/123645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 50 (2016); 67
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 50 (2016); 67
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 50 (2016); 67
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221797685133312