Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Osis,Maria José Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Cecatti,José Guilherme, Pádua,Karla Simônia de, Faúndes,Anibal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102006000200008
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS: Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS: Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil.
id USP-23_a886acec2594e6edc0f58eb521114e7a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102006000200008
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-sectionDelivery, obstetricsReferral and consultation/utilizationHealth knowledge, attitudes, practiceHospital, privativeHospital, publicC-sectionOBJECTIVE: To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS: Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS: Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2006-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102006000200008Revista de Saúde Pública v.40 n.2 2006reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0034-89102006000200008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOsis,Maria José DuarteCecatti,José GuilhermePádua,Karla Simônia deFaúndes,Anibaleng2006-08-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102006000200008Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2006-08-16T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
title Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
spellingShingle Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
Osis,Maria José Duarte
Delivery, obstetrics
Referral and consultation/utilization
Health knowledge, attitudes, practice
Hospital, privative
Hospital, public
C-section
title_short Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
title_full Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
title_fullStr Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
title_sort Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section
author Osis,Maria José Duarte
author_facet Osis,Maria José Duarte
Cecatti,José Guilherme
Pádua,Karla Simônia de
Faúndes,Anibal
author_role author
author2 Cecatti,José Guilherme
Pádua,Karla Simônia de
Faúndes,Anibal
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Osis,Maria José Duarte
Cecatti,José Guilherme
Pádua,Karla Simônia de
Faúndes,Anibal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Delivery, obstetrics
Referral and consultation/utilization
Health knowledge, attitudes, practice
Hospital, privative
Hospital, public
C-section
topic Delivery, obstetrics
Referral and consultation/utilization
Health knowledge, attitudes, practice
Hospital, privative
Hospital, public
C-section
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS: Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS: Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102006000200008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102006000200008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102006000200008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.40 n.2 2006
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936495108980736