Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kantorski,Luciane Prado
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira,Michele Mandagará de, Treichel,Carlos Alberto dos Santos, Bakolis,Ioannis, Alves,Poliana Farias, Coimbra,Valéria Cristina Christello, Cavada,Gustavo Pachon, Sperb,Lilian Cruz Souto de Oliveira, Guedes,Ariane da Cruz, Antonacci,Milena Hohmann, Willrich,Janaína Quinzen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102022000100206
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of and factors associated with: (1) major depressive episodes; (2) minor psychiatric disorders (MPDs); and (3) suicidal ideation among nursing professionals from a municipality in southern Brazil. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited 890 nursing professionals linked to 50 Primary Care units, 2 walk-in clinics, 2 hospital services, 1 emergency room service, 1 mobile emergency care service, and 1 teleconsultation service, in addition to the municipal epidemiological surveillance service and the vacancy regulation center between June and July 2020. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire to evaluate the studied outcomes. Associations between the outcomes and variables related to sociodemographic profile, work, health conditions, and daily life were explored using Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators. RESULTS The observed prevalence of depression, MPDs, and suicidal ideation were 36.6%, 44%, and 7.4%, respectively. MPDs were associated with the assessment of support received by the service as ‘regular’ (PR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.19–1.85) or ‘poor’ (PR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23–1.94), with a reported moderate (PR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.29–2.07), or heavy (PR: 2.54; 95% CI: 2.05–3.15) workload, and with suspected COVID-19 infection (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.25–1.66). Major depressive episodes were associated with a reported lack of personal protective equipment (PR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.42), whereas suicidal ideation was inversely related to per capita income > 3 minimum monthly wages (PR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11–0.68), and positively related to the use of psychotropic drugs (PR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.87–5.26). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that nursing professionals’ working conditions are associated with their mental health status. The need to improve working conditions through adequate dimensioning, support and proper biosafety measures is only heightened in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
id USP-23_a92ef58f2a2e0010638ff8f2eb57fe82
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102022000100206
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional studyNursing, Team, psychologyCOVID-19, nursingMental Disorders, epidemiologyMental HealthOccupational HealthCross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of and factors associated with: (1) major depressive episodes; (2) minor psychiatric disorders (MPDs); and (3) suicidal ideation among nursing professionals from a municipality in southern Brazil. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited 890 nursing professionals linked to 50 Primary Care units, 2 walk-in clinics, 2 hospital services, 1 emergency room service, 1 mobile emergency care service, and 1 teleconsultation service, in addition to the municipal epidemiological surveillance service and the vacancy regulation center between June and July 2020. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire to evaluate the studied outcomes. Associations between the outcomes and variables related to sociodemographic profile, work, health conditions, and daily life were explored using Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators. RESULTS The observed prevalence of depression, MPDs, and suicidal ideation were 36.6%, 44%, and 7.4%, respectively. MPDs were associated with the assessment of support received by the service as ‘regular’ (PR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.19–1.85) or ‘poor’ (PR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23–1.94), with a reported moderate (PR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.29–2.07), or heavy (PR: 2.54; 95% CI: 2.05–3.15) workload, and with suspected COVID-19 infection (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.25–1.66). Major depressive episodes were associated with a reported lack of personal protective equipment (PR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.42), whereas suicidal ideation was inversely related to per capita income > 3 minimum monthly wages (PR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11–0.68), and positively related to the use of psychotropic drugs (PR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.87–5.26). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that nursing professionals’ working conditions are associated with their mental health status. The need to improve working conditions through adequate dimensioning, support and proper biosafety measures is only heightened in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102022000100206Revista de Saúde Pública v.56 2022reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004122info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKantorski,Luciane PradoOliveira,Michele Mandagará deTreichel,Carlos Alberto dos SantosBakolis,IoannisAlves,Poliana FariasCoimbra,Valéria Cristina ChristelloCavada,Gustavo PachonSperb,Lilian Cruz Souto de OliveiraGuedes,Ariane da CruzAntonacci,Milena HohmannWillrich,Janaína Quinzeneng2022-08-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102022000100206Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2022-08-03T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
Kantorski,Luciane Prado
Nursing, Team, psychology
COVID-19, nursing
Mental Disorders, epidemiology
Mental Health
Occupational Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
title_short Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_full Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
author Kantorski,Luciane Prado
author_facet Kantorski,Luciane Prado
Oliveira,Michele Mandagará de
Treichel,Carlos Alberto dos Santos
Bakolis,Ioannis
Alves,Poliana Farias
Coimbra,Valéria Cristina Christello
Cavada,Gustavo Pachon
Sperb,Lilian Cruz Souto de Oliveira
Guedes,Ariane da Cruz
Antonacci,Milena Hohmann
Willrich,Janaína Quinzen
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Michele Mandagará de
Treichel,Carlos Alberto dos Santos
Bakolis,Ioannis
Alves,Poliana Farias
Coimbra,Valéria Cristina Christello
Cavada,Gustavo Pachon
Sperb,Lilian Cruz Souto de Oliveira
Guedes,Ariane da Cruz
Antonacci,Milena Hohmann
Willrich,Janaína Quinzen
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kantorski,Luciane Prado
Oliveira,Michele Mandagará de
Treichel,Carlos Alberto dos Santos
Bakolis,Ioannis
Alves,Poliana Farias
Coimbra,Valéria Cristina Christello
Cavada,Gustavo Pachon
Sperb,Lilian Cruz Souto de Oliveira
Guedes,Ariane da Cruz
Antonacci,Milena Hohmann
Willrich,Janaína Quinzen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nursing, Team, psychology
COVID-19, nursing
Mental Disorders, epidemiology
Mental Health
Occupational Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
topic Nursing, Team, psychology
COVID-19, nursing
Mental Disorders, epidemiology
Mental Health
Occupational Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of and factors associated with: (1) major depressive episodes; (2) minor psychiatric disorders (MPDs); and (3) suicidal ideation among nursing professionals from a municipality in southern Brazil. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited 890 nursing professionals linked to 50 Primary Care units, 2 walk-in clinics, 2 hospital services, 1 emergency room service, 1 mobile emergency care service, and 1 teleconsultation service, in addition to the municipal epidemiological surveillance service and the vacancy regulation center between June and July 2020. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire to evaluate the studied outcomes. Associations between the outcomes and variables related to sociodemographic profile, work, health conditions, and daily life were explored using Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators. RESULTS The observed prevalence of depression, MPDs, and suicidal ideation were 36.6%, 44%, and 7.4%, respectively. MPDs were associated with the assessment of support received by the service as ‘regular’ (PR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.19–1.85) or ‘poor’ (PR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23–1.94), with a reported moderate (PR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.29–2.07), or heavy (PR: 2.54; 95% CI: 2.05–3.15) workload, and with suspected COVID-19 infection (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.25–1.66). Major depressive episodes were associated with a reported lack of personal protective equipment (PR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.42), whereas suicidal ideation was inversely related to per capita income > 3 minimum monthly wages (PR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11–0.68), and positively related to the use of psychotropic drugs (PR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.87–5.26). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that nursing professionals’ working conditions are associated with their mental health status. The need to improve working conditions through adequate dimensioning, support and proper biosafety measures is only heightened in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102022000100206
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102022000100206
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004122
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.56 2022
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936506695745536