Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To verify the adequacy of hospital resources for perinatal care in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil in 1996. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted encompassing all the 28 maternity-hospitals in the city of Belo Horizonte, capital of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. A model of evaluation denominated "Níveis de Complexidade e Segurança em Potencial de Unidades Perinatais de Hospitais-Maternidade" [Levels of Complexity and Potential Safety in Maternity-Hospitals]. This model is based on the evaluation of three major areas in the hospital: general structure, perinatal clinical infra-structure and resources available in perinatal units. Two scores involving these three areas were created. When evaluating low risk perinatal care, the score may sum to a total of 1,000 points. On the other hand, when high to medium perinatal risk care is considered, the score may sum to 2,000 points. Hosptals that scored more than 500 points were classified in two levels: I-A and I-B (for low risk); and six levels I-A through III-B (for medium/high risk). RESULTS: Five hospitals were classified as level 0 according to the low risk score, that is, they were not considered adequate to assist any delivery. When the medium/high risk score was employed, a total of seven hospitals were considered inadequate to assist any delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation model was capable of classifying hospitals according to available infra-structure for perinatal care. |
id |
USP-23_b30cedfb78e870d7ffd51ebb5220b872 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31783 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil Avaliação dos recursos hospitalares para assistência perinatal em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais Assistência perinatalHospitaisAvaliação de processos e resultados (cuidados de saúde)Assistência ao pacienteAdministração hospitalarPerinatal careHospitalsOutcome and process assessment (health care)Patient careHospital administration OBJECTIVE: To verify the adequacy of hospital resources for perinatal care in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil in 1996. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted encompassing all the 28 maternity-hospitals in the city of Belo Horizonte, capital of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. A model of evaluation denominated "Níveis de Complexidade e Segurança em Potencial de Unidades Perinatais de Hospitais-Maternidade" [Levels of Complexity and Potential Safety in Maternity-Hospitals]. This model is based on the evaluation of three major areas in the hospital: general structure, perinatal clinical infra-structure and resources available in perinatal units. Two scores involving these three areas were created. When evaluating low risk perinatal care, the score may sum to a total of 1,000 points. On the other hand, when high to medium perinatal risk care is considered, the score may sum to 2,000 points. Hosptals that scored more than 500 points were classified in two levels: I-A and I-B (for low risk); and six levels I-A through III-B (for medium/high risk). RESULTS: Five hospitals were classified as level 0 according to the low risk score, that is, they were not considered adequate to assist any delivery. When the medium/high risk score was employed, a total of seven hospitals were considered inadequate to assist any delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation model was capable of classifying hospitals according to available infra-structure for perinatal care. OBJETIVO: Verificar a adequação de recursos hospitalares no atendimento às gestantes/neonatos, no ano de 1996. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo transversal abrangendo 28 hospitais-maternidade em funcionamento no município de Belo Horizonte, MG. Utilizou-se um modelo de avaliação denominado "níveis de complexidade e segurança em potencial de unidades perinatais de hospitais-maternidade", elaborado a partir da avaliação de três grandes áreas hospitalares: infra-estrutura geral, infra-estrutura clínica-perinatal e recursos das unidades perinatais. Foram desenvolvidos dois escores de pontos envolvendo essas áreas hospitalares, totalizando 1.000 pontos quando considerada a assistência perinatal de risco habitual e 2.000 pontos para assistência perinatal de médio/alto risco. A partir de 500 pontos, os hospitais foram classificados em dois níveis: I-A e I-B (para risco habitual) e seis níveis de I-A a III-B (para médio/alto risco). RESULTADOS: Na avaliação com o escore proposto para risco habitual, cinco hospitais foram considerados inadequados para realizarem atendimento a qualquer tipo de parto, classificados como nível zero; esse número aumentou para sete, quando se utilizou o escore para parto de médio/alto risco. CONCLUSÃO: O modelo de avaliação utilizado mostrou-se adequado para classificar os hospitais de acordo com a infra-estrutura disponível para assistência perinatal. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2004-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3178310.1590/S0034-89102004000500013Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 38 No. 5 (2004); 701-708 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 38 Núm. 5 (2004); 701-708 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 5 (2004); 701-708 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783/33711https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783/33712Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, José OrleansXavier, César CoelhoProietti, Fernando AugustoDelgado, Margarida S2012-07-08T22:11:01Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31783Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:11:01Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil Avaliação dos recursos hospitalares para assistência perinatal em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais |
title |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil Costa, José Orleans Assistência perinatal Hospitais Avaliação de processos e resultados (cuidados de saúde) Assistência ao paciente Administração hospitalar Perinatal care Hospitals Outcome and process assessment (health care) Patient care Hospital administration |
title_short |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
title_full |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
title_sort |
Evaluation of hospital resources for perinatal assistance in Brazil |
author |
Costa, José Orleans |
author_facet |
Costa, José Orleans Xavier, César Coelho Proietti, Fernando Augusto Delgado, Margarida S |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Xavier, César Coelho Proietti, Fernando Augusto Delgado, Margarida S |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, José Orleans Xavier, César Coelho Proietti, Fernando Augusto Delgado, Margarida S |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assistência perinatal Hospitais Avaliação de processos e resultados (cuidados de saúde) Assistência ao paciente Administração hospitalar Perinatal care Hospitals Outcome and process assessment (health care) Patient care Hospital administration |
topic |
Assistência perinatal Hospitais Avaliação de processos e resultados (cuidados de saúde) Assistência ao paciente Administração hospitalar Perinatal care Hospitals Outcome and process assessment (health care) Patient care Hospital administration |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To verify the adequacy of hospital resources for perinatal care in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil in 1996. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted encompassing all the 28 maternity-hospitals in the city of Belo Horizonte, capital of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. A model of evaluation denominated "Níveis de Complexidade e Segurança em Potencial de Unidades Perinatais de Hospitais-Maternidade" [Levels of Complexity and Potential Safety in Maternity-Hospitals]. This model is based on the evaluation of three major areas in the hospital: general structure, perinatal clinical infra-structure and resources available in perinatal units. Two scores involving these three areas were created. When evaluating low risk perinatal care, the score may sum to a total of 1,000 points. On the other hand, when high to medium perinatal risk care is considered, the score may sum to 2,000 points. Hosptals that scored more than 500 points were classified in two levels: I-A and I-B (for low risk); and six levels I-A through III-B (for medium/high risk). RESULTS: Five hospitals were classified as level 0 according to the low risk score, that is, they were not considered adequate to assist any delivery. When the medium/high risk score was employed, a total of seven hospitals were considered inadequate to assist any delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation model was capable of classifying hospitals according to available infra-structure for perinatal care. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783 10.1590/S0034-89102004000500013 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102004000500013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783/33711 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31783/33712 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 38 No. 5 (2004); 701-708 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 38 Núm. 5 (2004); 701-708 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 5 (2004); 701-708 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221782942154752 |