Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Escuder, Maria Mercedes Loureiro, Claro, Rafael Moreira, Silva, Nilza Nunes da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600
Resumo: OBJECTIVE : To compare the efficiency and accuracy of sampling designs including and excluding the sampling of individuals within sampled households in health surveys. METHODS : From a population survey conducted in Baixada Santista Metropolitan Area, SP, Southeastern Brazil, lowlands between 2006 and 2007, 1,000 samples were drawn for each design and estimates for people aged 18 to 59 and 18 and over were calculated for each sample. In the first design, 40 census tracts, 12 households per sector, and one person per household were sampled. In the second, no sampling within the household was performed and 40 census sectors and 6 households for the 18 to 59-year old group and 5 or 6 for the 18 and over age group or more were sampled. Precision and bias of proportion estimates for 11 indicators were assessed in the two final sets of the 1000 selected samples with the two types of design. They were compared by means of relative measurements: coefficient of variation, bias/mean ratio, bias/standard error ratio, and relative mean square error. Comparison of costs contrasted basic cost per person, household cost, number of people, and households. RESULTS : Bias was found to be negligible for both designs. A lower precision was found in the design including individuals sampling within households, and the costs were higher. CONCLUSIONS : The design excluding individual sampling achieved higher levels of efficiency and accuracy and, accordingly, should be first choice for investigators. Sampling of household dwellers should be adopted when there are reasons related to the study subject that may lead to bias in individual responses if multiple dwellers answer the proposed questionnaire.
id USP-23_e4a46e6c7f788955540a9867617a1bc2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80600
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud Sorteio intradomiciliar em inquéritos de saúde Selection within households in health surveys OBJECTIVE : To compare the efficiency and accuracy of sampling designs including and excluding the sampling of individuals within sampled households in health surveys. METHODS : From a population survey conducted in Baixada Santista Metropolitan Area, SP, Southeastern Brazil, lowlands between 2006 and 2007, 1,000 samples were drawn for each design and estimates for people aged 18 to 59 and 18 and over were calculated for each sample. In the first design, 40 census tracts, 12 households per sector, and one person per household were sampled. In the second, no sampling within the household was performed and 40 census sectors and 6 households for the 18 to 59-year old group and 5 or 6 for the 18 and over age group or more were sampled. Precision and bias of proportion estimates for 11 indicators were assessed in the two final sets of the 1000 selected samples with the two types of design. They were compared by means of relative measurements: coefficient of variation, bias/mean ratio, bias/standard error ratio, and relative mean square error. Comparison of costs contrasted basic cost per person, household cost, number of people, and households. RESULTS : Bias was found to be negligible for both designs. A lower precision was found in the design including individuals sampling within households, and the costs were higher. CONCLUSIONS : The design excluding individual sampling achieved higher levels of efficiency and accuracy and, accordingly, should be first choice for investigators. Sampling of household dwellers should be adopted when there are reasons related to the study subject that may lead to bias in individual responses if multiple dwellers answer the proposed questionnaire. OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficiencia y la precisión de delineamientos de muestreo con y sin sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisas de salud. MÉTODOS: Con base en los datos de una pesquisa realizada en la Baixada Santista, SP – Brasil, entre 2006 y 2007, se retiraron 1.000 muestras considerando cada uno de los delineamientos y, en cada muestra, se obtuvo estimativas para personas de 18 a 59 años de edad y de 18 años y más. En el primero, fueron sorteados 40 sectores censados, 12 domicilios por sector y una persona por domicilio. En el análisis, los datos fueron ponderados por el número de adultos residentes en los domicilios. En el segundo, se sortearon 40 sectores, seis domicilios por sector para el grupo de 18 a 59 años de edad y cinco o seis domicilios para el grupo de 18 años y más. No hubo sorteo dentro del domicilio. Medidas de precisión y de vicio de las estimativas de proporción para 11 indicadores fueron calculadas en los dos conjuntos finales de muestras seleccionadas para los dos tipos de delineamientos. Ambos fueron comparados por medio de medidas relativas: coeficiente de variación, cociente vicio/promedio, cociente vicio/desviación estándar y desviación media cuadrática relativa. El costo fue comparado considerando costo básico por persona, costo por domicilio y número de personas y domicilios. RESULTADOS: Los vicios se mostraron insignificantes en los dos delineamientos. La precisión fue mayor para el delineamiento sin sorteo y el costo fue menor. CONCLUSIONES: El delineamiento sin sorteo intra-domiciliar se mostró superior en términos de eficiencia y precisión, siendo la opción preferencial del investigador. El sorteo de la población debe ser adoptado cuando existan motivos relacionados con el objeto de estudio que puedan llevar a la introducción de vicios en las respuestas de los entrevistados en el caso de que varios de ellos respondan al cuestionario propuesto. OBJETIVO : Comparar a eficiência e a acurácia de delineamentos de amostragem com e sem sorteio intradomiciliar em inquéritos de saúde. MÉTODOS : Com base nos dados de um inquérito realizado na Baixada Santista, SP, entre 2006 e 2007, foram retiradas 1.000 amostras sob cada um dos delineamentos e, em cada amostra, foram obtidas estimativas para pessoas de 18 a 59 anos de idade e de 18 anos e mais. Sob o primeiro, foram sorteados 40 setores censitários, 12 domicílios por setor e uma pessoa por domicílio. Na análise, os dados foram ponderados pelo número de adultos residentes nos domicílios. Sob o segundo, foram sorteados 40 setores, seis domicílios por setor para o grupo de 18 a 59 anos de idade e cinco ou seis domicílios para o grupo de 18 anos e mais. Não houve sorteio dentro do domicílio. Medidas de precisão e de vício das estimativas de proporção para 11 indicadores foram calculadas nos dois conjuntos finais das amostras selecionadas para os dois tipos de delineamentos. Estes foram comparados por meio das medidas relativas: coeficiente de variação, razão vício/média, razão vício/erro padrão e erro quadrático médio relativo. O custo foi comparado considerando custo básico por pessoa, custo por domicílio e números de pessoas e domicílios. RESULTADOS : Os vícios mostraram-se desprezíveis nos dois delineamentos. A precisão foi maior para o delineamento sem sorteio e o custo foi menor. CONCLUSÕES : O delineamento sem sorteio intradomicilar mostrou-se superior em termos de eficiência e acurácia, devendo ser a opção preferencial do pesquisador. O sorteio de moradores deve ser adotado quando houver razões referentes ao objeto de estudo que possam levar à introdução de vícios nas respostas dos entrevistados no caso de vários moradores responderem ao questionário proposto. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/8060010.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004540Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2014); 86-93Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2014); 86-93Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 1 (2014); 86-931518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600/84250https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600/84251Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto Escuder, Maria Mercedes Loureiro Claro, Rafael Moreira Silva, Nilza Nunes da 2014-05-08T14:01:04Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80600Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-05-08T14:01:04Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
Sorteio intradomiciliar em inquéritos de saúde
Selection within households in health surveys
title Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
spellingShingle Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
title_short Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
title_full Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
title_fullStr Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
title_full_unstemmed Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
title_sort Sorteo intra-domiciliar en pesquisa de salud
author Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
author_facet Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Escuder, Maria Mercedes Loureiro
Claro, Rafael Moreira
Silva, Nilza Nunes da
author_role author
author2 Escuder, Maria Mercedes Loureiro
Claro, Rafael Moreira
Silva, Nilza Nunes da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Escuder, Maria Mercedes Loureiro
Claro, Rafael Moreira
Silva, Nilza Nunes da
description OBJECTIVE : To compare the efficiency and accuracy of sampling designs including and excluding the sampling of individuals within sampled households in health surveys. METHODS : From a population survey conducted in Baixada Santista Metropolitan Area, SP, Southeastern Brazil, lowlands between 2006 and 2007, 1,000 samples were drawn for each design and estimates for people aged 18 to 59 and 18 and over were calculated for each sample. In the first design, 40 census tracts, 12 households per sector, and one person per household were sampled. In the second, no sampling within the household was performed and 40 census sectors and 6 households for the 18 to 59-year old group and 5 or 6 for the 18 and over age group or more were sampled. Precision and bias of proportion estimates for 11 indicators were assessed in the two final sets of the 1000 selected samples with the two types of design. They were compared by means of relative measurements: coefficient of variation, bias/mean ratio, bias/standard error ratio, and relative mean square error. Comparison of costs contrasted basic cost per person, household cost, number of people, and households. RESULTS : Bias was found to be negligible for both designs. A lower precision was found in the design including individuals sampling within households, and the costs were higher. CONCLUSIONS : The design excluding individual sampling achieved higher levels of efficiency and accuracy and, accordingly, should be first choice for investigators. Sampling of household dwellers should be adopted when there are reasons related to the study subject that may lead to bias in individual responses if multiple dwellers answer the proposed questionnaire.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004540
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004540
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600/84250
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/80600/84251
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2014); 86-93
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2014); 86-93
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 1 (2014); 86-93
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221795285991424