Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31907 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare the Culicidae fauna in forest, ecotone and anthropic environments and to analyze their composition according to the number of species and individuals, species richness, diversity, heterogeneity and similarities and to determine species dominance and the relationship between species dominance and climatic factors. METHODS: CO2 -baited CDC light traps were used for mosquito collection twice a month in the Serra da Cantareira State Park from February 2001 to January 2002. CO2 - baited CDC light traps were placed in five different environments. The analyses were carried out using Margalef and Menhinick's diversity indexes. Similarity was calculated using the Sorensen index and species dominance was indicated by the Berger-Parker index. Mosquito heterogeneity was estimated using Simpson and Shannon indexes. The correlation between species dominance and climatic factors was estimated by Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: There were collected 2,219 Culicidae mosquitoes of 11 genera and 21 species. The forest environment showed the highest species richness (Mg=3.64) and the anthropic environment presented the most dominant species (d=0.85). Temperature showed the greatest positive correlation (Rs=0.747; p |
id |
USP-23_f9f80d8668a62129f17b5c52d26e5d35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31907 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil Fauna de Culicidae da Serra da Cantareira, São Paulo, Brasil CulicidaeEcologia de vetoresInsetos vetoresEcossistemaCulicidaeEcologyvectorsInsect vectorsEcosystem OBJECTIVE: To compare the Culicidae fauna in forest, ecotone and anthropic environments and to analyze their composition according to the number of species and individuals, species richness, diversity, heterogeneity and similarities and to determine species dominance and the relationship between species dominance and climatic factors. METHODS: CO2 -baited CDC light traps were used for mosquito collection twice a month in the Serra da Cantareira State Park from February 2001 to January 2002. CO2 - baited CDC light traps were placed in five different environments. The analyses were carried out using Margalef and Menhinick's diversity indexes. Similarity was calculated using the Sorensen index and species dominance was indicated by the Berger-Parker index. Mosquito heterogeneity was estimated using Simpson and Shannon indexes. The correlation between species dominance and climatic factors was estimated by Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: There were collected 2,219 Culicidae mosquitoes of 11 genera and 21 species. The forest environment showed the highest species richness (Mg=3.64) and the anthropic environment presented the most dominant species (d=0.85). Temperature showed the greatest positive correlation (Rs=0.747; p OBJETIVO: Comparar a fauna de culicídeos nos ambientes de mata, ecótono e peridomicílio quanto ao número de espécies e de indivíduos, estimativas de diversidade, riqueza, heterogeneidade e similaridade. Determinou-se ainda as espécies dominantes e as relações entre dominância específica e fatores climáticos. MÉTODOS: Foram conduzidas no Parque Ecológico da Cantareira coletas quinzenais com armadilhas luminosas tipo CDC-CO2, dispostas em cinco ambientes ecologicamente diferentes, de fevereiro de 2001 a janeiro de 2002. As análises foram feitas utilizando o índice de Diversidade de Margalef e o de Menhinick. Para similaridade, foi utilizado o índice de Sorensen e, para dominância de espécies, o índice de Berger-Parker. A heterogeneidade foi estimada pelos índices de Simpson e de Shannon. A relação entre dominância específica e fatores climáticos foi estimada por correlação de Spearman. RESULTADOS: Foram coletados 2.219 culicídeos, distribuídos em 11 gêneros e 21 espécies. O ambiente mata apresentou maior riqueza (Mg=3,64) de espécies e o peridomicílio maior dominância (d=0,85). A temperatura mostrou a correlação mais elevada (Rs=0,747; pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2005-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3190710.1590/S0034-89102005000400010Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 4 (2005); 578-584 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 4 (2005); 578-584 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 4 (2005); 578-584 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31907/33886Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontes, Joyce2012-07-08T22:43:36Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31907Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:43:36Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil Fauna de Culicidae da Serra da Cantareira, São Paulo, Brasil |
title |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil Montes, Joyce Culicidae Ecologia de vetores Insetos vetores Ecossistema Culicidae Ecology vectors Insect vectors Ecosystem |
title_short |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
title_full |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
title_sort |
Culicidae fauna of Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil |
author |
Montes, Joyce |
author_facet |
Montes, Joyce |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montes, Joyce |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Culicidae Ecologia de vetores Insetos vetores Ecossistema Culicidae Ecology vectors Insect vectors Ecosystem |
topic |
Culicidae Ecologia de vetores Insetos vetores Ecossistema Culicidae Ecology vectors Insect vectors Ecosystem |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Culicidae fauna in forest, ecotone and anthropic environments and to analyze their composition according to the number of species and individuals, species richness, diversity, heterogeneity and similarities and to determine species dominance and the relationship between species dominance and climatic factors. METHODS: CO2 -baited CDC light traps were used for mosquito collection twice a month in the Serra da Cantareira State Park from February 2001 to January 2002. CO2 - baited CDC light traps were placed in five different environments. The analyses were carried out using Margalef and Menhinick's diversity indexes. Similarity was calculated using the Sorensen index and species dominance was indicated by the Berger-Parker index. Mosquito heterogeneity was estimated using Simpson and Shannon indexes. The correlation between species dominance and climatic factors was estimated by Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: There were collected 2,219 Culicidae mosquitoes of 11 genera and 21 species. The forest environment showed the highest species richness (Mg=3.64) and the anthropic environment presented the most dominant species (d=0.85). Temperature showed the greatest positive correlation (Rs=0.747; p |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31907 10.1590/S0034-89102005000400010 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31907 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102005000400010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31907/33886 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 4 (2005); 578-584 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 4 (2005); 578-584 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 4 (2005); 578-584 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221783691886592 |