Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Adriana Cristina de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Gama,Camila Sarmento
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000500767
Resumo: AbstractOBJECTIVEEvaluate pre- and intraoperative practices adopted by medical and nursing teams for the prevention of surgical infections.METHODA prospective study carried out in the period of April to May 2013, in a surgical center of a university hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.RESULTS18 surgeries were followed and 214 surgical gloves were analyzed, of which 23 (10.7%) had postoperative glove perforation detected, with 52.2% being perceived by users. Hair removal was performed on 27.7% of patients in the operating room, with the use of blades in 80% of the cases. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 81.8% of patients up to 60 minutes prior to surgical incision. An average of nine professionals were present during surgery and the surgery room door remained open in 94.4% of the procedures.CONCLUSIONPartial adhesion to the recommended measures was identified, reaffirming a need for greater attention to these critical steps/actions in order to prevent surgical site infection.
id USP-24_3ae480b636354af6698bfa917ac00ea4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-62342015000500767
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical teamSurgical Wound InfectionOperating RoomsGeneral SurgeryGloves, SurgicalInfection ControlPerioperative NursingAbstractOBJECTIVEEvaluate pre- and intraoperative practices adopted by medical and nursing teams for the prevention of surgical infections.METHODA prospective study carried out in the period of April to May 2013, in a surgical center of a university hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.RESULTS18 surgeries were followed and 214 surgical gloves were analyzed, of which 23 (10.7%) had postoperative glove perforation detected, with 52.2% being perceived by users. Hair removal was performed on 27.7% of patients in the operating room, with the use of blades in 80% of the cases. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 81.8% of patients up to 60 minutes prior to surgical incision. An average of nine professionals were present during surgery and the surgery room door remained open in 94.4% of the procedures.CONCLUSIONPartial adhesion to the recommended measures was identified, reaffirming a need for greater attention to these critical steps/actions in order to prevent surgical site infection.Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000500767Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.5 2015reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0080-623420150000500009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Adriana Cristina deGama,Camila Sarmentoeng2015-10-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342015000500767Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2015-10-21T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
title Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
spellingShingle Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
Oliveira,Adriana Cristina de
Surgical Wound Infection
Operating Rooms
General Surgery
Gloves, Surgical
Infection Control
Perioperative Nursing
title_short Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
title_full Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
title_fullStr Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
title_sort Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
author Oliveira,Adriana Cristina de
author_facet Oliveira,Adriana Cristina de
Gama,Camila Sarmento
author_role author
author2 Gama,Camila Sarmento
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Adriana Cristina de
Gama,Camila Sarmento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Surgical Wound Infection
Operating Rooms
General Surgery
Gloves, Surgical
Infection Control
Perioperative Nursing
topic Surgical Wound Infection
Operating Rooms
General Surgery
Gloves, Surgical
Infection Control
Perioperative Nursing
description AbstractOBJECTIVEEvaluate pre- and intraoperative practices adopted by medical and nursing teams for the prevention of surgical infections.METHODA prospective study carried out in the period of April to May 2013, in a surgical center of a university hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.RESULTS18 surgeries were followed and 214 surgical gloves were analyzed, of which 23 (10.7%) had postoperative glove perforation detected, with 52.2% being perceived by users. Hair removal was performed on 27.7% of patients in the operating room, with the use of blades in 80% of the cases. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 81.8% of patients up to 60 minutes prior to surgical incision. An average of nine professionals were present during surgery and the surgery room door remained open in 94.4% of the procedures.CONCLUSIONPartial adhesion to the recommended measures was identified, reaffirming a need for greater attention to these critical steps/actions in order to prevent surgical site infection.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000500767
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000500767
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0080-623420150000500009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.5 2015
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1748936537757712384