Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000600889 |
Resumo: | Abstract OBJECTIVE To describe the stages of construction and validation of an instrument in order to analyze the adherence to best care practices during labour and birth. METHOD Methodological research, carried out in three steps: construction of dimensions and items, face and content validity and semantic analysis of the items. RESULTS The face and content validity was carried out by 10 judges working in healthcare, teaching and research. Items with Content Validity Index (CVI) ≥ 0.9 were kept in full or undergone revisions as suggested by the judges. Semantic analysis, performed twice, indicated that there was no difficulty in understanding the items. CONCLUSION The instrument with three dimensions (organization of healthcare network to pregnancy and childbirth, evidence-based practices and work processes) followed the steps recommended in the literature, concluded with 50 items and total CVI of 0.98. |
id |
USP-24_4230a9827aff2a806fc4f0f23803d3ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0080-62342015000600889 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrumentNatural ChildbirthQuestionnairesValidation StudiesWomen's HealthAbstract OBJECTIVE To describe the stages of construction and validation of an instrument in order to analyze the adherence to best care practices during labour and birth. METHOD Methodological research, carried out in three steps: construction of dimensions and items, face and content validity and semantic analysis of the items. RESULTS The face and content validity was carried out by 10 judges working in healthcare, teaching and research. Items with Content Validity Index (CVI) ≥ 0.9 were kept in full or undergone revisions as suggested by the judges. Semantic analysis, performed twice, indicated that there was no difficulty in understanding the items. CONCLUSION The instrument with three dimensions (organization of healthcare network to pregnancy and childbirth, evidence-based practices and work processes) followed the steps recommended in the literature, concluded with 50 items and total CVI of 0.98.Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000600889Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.6 2015reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0080-623420150000600003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Elisabete Mesquita Peres deGöttems,Leila Bernarda DonatoPires,Maria Raquel Gomes Maiaeng2015-12-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342015000600889Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2015-12-08T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
title |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
spellingShingle |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument Carvalho,Elisabete Mesquita Peres de Natural Childbirth Questionnaires Validation Studies Women's Health |
title_short |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
title_full |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
title_fullStr |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
title_sort |
Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument |
author |
Carvalho,Elisabete Mesquita Peres de |
author_facet |
Carvalho,Elisabete Mesquita Peres de Göttems,Leila Bernarda Donato Pires,Maria Raquel Gomes Maia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Göttems,Leila Bernarda Donato Pires,Maria Raquel Gomes Maia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho,Elisabete Mesquita Peres de Göttems,Leila Bernarda Donato Pires,Maria Raquel Gomes Maia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Natural Childbirth Questionnaires Validation Studies Women's Health |
topic |
Natural Childbirth Questionnaires Validation Studies Women's Health |
description |
Abstract OBJECTIVE To describe the stages of construction and validation of an instrument in order to analyze the adherence to best care practices during labour and birth. METHOD Methodological research, carried out in three steps: construction of dimensions and items, face and content validity and semantic analysis of the items. RESULTS The face and content validity was carried out by 10 judges working in healthcare, teaching and research. Items with Content Validity Index (CVI) ≥ 0.9 were kept in full or undergone revisions as suggested by the judges. Semantic analysis, performed twice, indicated that there was no difficulty in understanding the items. CONCLUSION The instrument with three dimensions (organization of healthcare network to pregnancy and childbirth, evidence-based practices and work processes) followed the steps recommended in the literature, concluded with 50 items and total CVI of 0.98. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000600889 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000600889 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0080-623420150000600003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.6 2015 reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||nursingscholar@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936537779732480 |