Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100802 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events. Method: Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: health institutions) carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature. Results: The search totaled 825 scientific productions, 31 of which met the objective of the study, which consisted of 27 scientific articles and 4 expert consensus. It was possible to carry out a synthesis of the necessary steps for the investigation of adverse events and use of the tools according to the extent of damage. Conclusion: The practice of investigating adverse events should be guided by a thorough understanding of contributing factors, a fair culture, and the involvement of senior leadership. |
id |
USP-24_5145c7f8241a605f43284f81cb3a2aa1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0080-62342022000100802 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping reviewPatient SafetyRisk ManagementPatient HarmHealth Quality ManagementSafety ManagementABSTRACT Objective: To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events. Method: Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: health institutions) carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature. Results: The search totaled 825 scientific productions, 31 of which met the objective of the study, which consisted of 27 scientific articles and 4 expert consensus. It was possible to carry out a synthesis of the necessary steps for the investigation of adverse events and use of the tools according to the extent of damage. Conclusion: The practice of investigating adverse events should be guided by a thorough understanding of contributing factors, a fair culture, and the involvement of senior leadership.Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100802Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.56 2022reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0519eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello,Lucas Rodrigo Garcia deChristovam,Barbara PompeuMoreira,Ana Paula AmorimMoraes,Erica Brandão dePaes,Graciele OroskiPrates,Cassiana Gileng2022-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342022000100802Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2022-06-15T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
title |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review Mello,Lucas Rodrigo Garcia de Patient Safety Risk Management Patient Harm Health Quality Management Safety Management |
title_short |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
title_full |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
title_sort |
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review |
author |
Mello,Lucas Rodrigo Garcia de |
author_facet |
Mello,Lucas Rodrigo Garcia de Christovam,Barbara Pompeu Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim Moraes,Erica Brandão de Paes,Graciele Oroski Prates,Cassiana Gil |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Christovam,Barbara Pompeu Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim Moraes,Erica Brandão de Paes,Graciele Oroski Prates,Cassiana Gil |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello,Lucas Rodrigo Garcia de Christovam,Barbara Pompeu Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim Moraes,Erica Brandão de Paes,Graciele Oroski Prates,Cassiana Gil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patient Safety Risk Management Patient Harm Health Quality Management Safety Management |
topic |
Patient Safety Risk Management Patient Harm Health Quality Management Safety Management |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events. Method: Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: health institutions) carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature. Results: The search totaled 825 scientific productions, 31 of which met the objective of the study, which consisted of 27 scientific articles and 4 expert consensus. It was possible to carry out a synthesis of the necessary steps for the investigation of adverse events and use of the tools according to the extent of damage. Conclusion: The practice of investigating adverse events should be guided by a thorough understanding of contributing factors, a fair culture, and the involvement of senior leadership. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100802 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100802 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0519en |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.56 2022 reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||nursingscholar@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936542279172096 |