Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Frota,Oleci Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Adriano Menis, Barcelos,Larissa da Silva, Watanabe,Evandro, Carvalho,Nádia Cristina Pereira, Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342014000400618
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the safety of the performance of the traditional and protected collection techniques of tracheal aspirate and to identify qualitative and quantitative agreement of the results of microbiological cultures between the techniques. Method: Clinical, prospective, comparative, single-blind research. The sample was composed of 54 patients of >18 years of age, undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for a period of ≥48 hours and with suspected Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. The two techniques were implemented in the same patient, one immediately after the other, with an order of random execution, according to randomization by specialized software. Results: No significant events occurred oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic instability or tracheobronchial hemorrhage (p<0.05) and, although there were differences in some strains, there was qualitative and quantitative agreement between the techniques (p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilization of the protected technique provided no advantage over the traditional and execution of both techniques was safe for the patient.

id USP-24_6573b8b112f79491a2077997bec89d75
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-62342014000400618
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniquesPneumonia, ventilator-associatedCulture techniquesInfectionIntensive careNursing carePatient´s safetyObjective: To evaluate the safety of the performance of the traditional and protected collection techniques of tracheal aspirate and to identify qualitative and quantitative agreement of the results of microbiological cultures between the techniques. Method: Clinical, prospective, comparative, single-blind research. The sample was composed of 54 patients of >18 years of age, undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for a period of ≥48 hours and with suspected Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. The two techniques were implemented in the same patient, one immediately after the other, with an order of random execution, according to randomization by specialized software. Results: No significant events occurred oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic instability or tracheobronchial hemorrhage (p<0.05) and, although there were differences in some strains, there was qualitative and quantitative agreement between the techniques (p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilization of the protected technique provided no advantage over the traditional and execution of both techniques was safe for the patient.
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342014000400618Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.48 n.4 2014reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0080-623420140000400007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrota,Oleci PereiraFerreira,Adriano MenisBarcelos,Larissa da SilvaWatanabe,EvandroCarvalho,Nádia Cristina PereiraRigotti,Marcelo Alessandroeng2015-05-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342014000400618Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2015-05-19T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
title Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
spellingShingle Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
Frota,Oleci Pereira
Pneumonia, ventilator-associated
Culture techniques
Infection
Intensive care
Nursing care
Patient´s safety
title_short Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
title_full Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
title_fullStr Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
title_full_unstemmed Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
title_sort Collection of tracheal aspirate: safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques
author Frota,Oleci Pereira
author_facet Frota,Oleci Pereira
Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Barcelos,Larissa da Silva
Watanabe,Evandro
Carvalho,Nádia Cristina Pereira
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Barcelos,Larissa da Silva
Watanabe,Evandro
Carvalho,Nádia Cristina Pereira
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Frota,Oleci Pereira
Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Barcelos,Larissa da Silva
Watanabe,Evandro
Carvalho,Nádia Cristina Pereira
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pneumonia, ventilator-associated
Culture techniques
Infection
Intensive care
Nursing care
Patient´s safety
topic Pneumonia, ventilator-associated
Culture techniques
Infection
Intensive care
Nursing care
Patient´s safety
description Objective: To evaluate the safety of the performance of the traditional and protected collection techniques of tracheal aspirate and to identify qualitative and quantitative agreement of the results of microbiological cultures between the techniques. Method: Clinical, prospective, comparative, single-blind research. The sample was composed of 54 patients of >18 years of age, undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for a period of ≥48 hours and with suspected Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. The two techniques were implemented in the same patient, one immediately after the other, with an order of random execution, according to randomization by specialized software. Results: No significant events occurred oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic instability or tracheobronchial hemorrhage (p<0.05) and, although there were differences in some strains, there was qualitative and quantitative agreement between the techniques (p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilization of the protected technique provided no advantage over the traditional and execution of both techniques was safe for the patient.

publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342014000400618
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342014000400618
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0080-623420140000400007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.48 n.4 2014
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1748936536918851584