Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Taminato,Mônica
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Fram,Dayana, Grothe,Cibele, Pereira,Rogério Rodrigues Floriano, Belasco,Angélica, Barbosa,Dulce
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000300502
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To verify if the type of donor is a risk factor for infection in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Systematic Review of Literature with Meta-analysis with searches conducted in the databases MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, SciELO and CINAHL. RESULTS We selected 198 studies and included four observational studies describing infections among patients distinguishing the type of donor. Through meta-analysis, it was shown that in patients undergoing deceased donor transplant, the outcome infection was 2.65 higher, than those who received an organ from a living donor. CONCLUSION The study showed that deceased kidney donor recipients are at an increased risk for developing infections and so the need for establishing and enforcing protocols from proper management of ischemic time to the prevention and control of infection in this population emerges.
id USP-24_b6fc21477f658c4f2ac6266523655f30
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-62342015000300502
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysisKidney TransplantationTissue DonorsLiving DonorsInfectionReview OBJECTIVE To verify if the type of donor is a risk factor for infection in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Systematic Review of Literature with Meta-analysis with searches conducted in the databases MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, SciELO and CINAHL. RESULTS We selected 198 studies and included four observational studies describing infections among patients distinguishing the type of donor. Through meta-analysis, it was shown that in patients undergoing deceased donor transplant, the outcome infection was 2.65 higher, than those who received an organ from a living donor. CONCLUSION The study showed that deceased kidney donor recipients are at an increased risk for developing infections and so the need for establishing and enforcing protocols from proper management of ischemic time to the prevention and control of infection in this population emerges. Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000300502Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.3 2015reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0080-623420150000300020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTaminato,MônicaFram,DayanaGrothe,CibelePereira,Rogério Rodrigues FlorianoBelasco,AngélicaBarbosa,Dulceeng2015-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342015000300502Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2015-06-15T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
Taminato,Mônica
Kidney Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Living Donors
Infection
Review
title_short Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Prevalence of infection in kidney transplantation from living versus deceased donor: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Taminato,Mônica
author_facet Taminato,Mônica
Fram,Dayana
Grothe,Cibele
Pereira,Rogério Rodrigues Floriano
Belasco,Angélica
Barbosa,Dulce
author_role author
author2 Fram,Dayana
Grothe,Cibele
Pereira,Rogério Rodrigues Floriano
Belasco,Angélica
Barbosa,Dulce
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taminato,Mônica
Fram,Dayana
Grothe,Cibele
Pereira,Rogério Rodrigues Floriano
Belasco,Angélica
Barbosa,Dulce
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kidney Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Living Donors
Infection
Review
topic Kidney Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Living Donors
Infection
Review
description OBJECTIVE To verify if the type of donor is a risk factor for infection in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Systematic Review of Literature with Meta-analysis with searches conducted in the databases MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, SciELO and CINAHL. RESULTS We selected 198 studies and included four observational studies describing infections among patients distinguishing the type of donor. Through meta-analysis, it was shown that in patients undergoing deceased donor transplant, the outcome infection was 2.65 higher, than those who received an organ from a living donor. CONCLUSION The study showed that deceased kidney donor recipients are at an increased risk for developing infections and so the need for establishing and enforcing protocols from proper management of ischemic time to the prevention and control of infection in this population emerges.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000300502
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000300502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0080-623420150000300020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.49 n.3 2015
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1748936537710526464

Registros relacionados