Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528 |
Resumo: | Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (p |
id |
USP-24_fa7ac28733cea8da76ce21f2d3d63017 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/109528 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals Evaluación de los programas de control de infecciones asociadas en el cuidado de la salud Avaliação de Programas de Controle de Infecção relacionada a Assistência à Saúde de Hospitais Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (pObjetivo Evaluar el desempeño de estos programas en los hospitales de Paraná, considerando como hipótese desempenho geral mínimo de 75%. Método Estudio transversal de la evaluación del proceso, mediante instrumento previamente validado que consta de cuatro indicadores que evalúan la estructura técnica y operativa (PECP), directrices operacionales (PCDO), el sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica (PCVE) y las actividades de control y la prevención (PCCP). El estudio se llevó a cabo desde 2013 hasta 2014 en 50 hospitales de la muestra gratuita. Resultados El cumplimiento global obtenida fue de 71,0% (23,88dp) y el indicador PECP 79,4% (18,9dp); PCVE 76,0% (30.5dp); PCDO 65,5% (26,9dp); y 63,2% PCPP/(39,5dp). Hubo un mejor rendimiento estadísticamente significativa de PCIRAS realización de auditorías internas (p=0,0099), la certificación de calidad (p=0,01949), enfermera exclusiva (pObjetivo Avaliar os Programas de Controle de Infecção em hospitais do Paraná, considerando como hipótese desempenho geral mínimo de 75%. Método Estudo transversal de avaliação processual, por meio de instrumento previamente validado, composto por quatro indicadores que avaliam a estrutura técnico-operacional (PCET), as diretrizes operacionais (PCDO), o sistema de vigilância epidemiológica (PCVE) e as atividades de controle e prevenção (PCCP). O estudo foi realizado de 2013 a 2014 em 50 hospitais por amostra de acesso. Resultados A conformidade geral obtida foi 71,0% (23,88dp), sendo indicador PCET 79,4% (18,9dp); PCVE 76,0% (30,5dp); PCDO 65,5% (26,9dp); e PCCP 63,2%/ (39,5dp). Houve significância estatística para melhor desempenho dos PCIRAS a realização de auditorias internas (p=0,0099), certificação de qualidade (p=0,01949), enfermeiro exclusivo (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/10952810.1590/S0080-623420150000700010Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 49 (2015): Número Especial; 65-73Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Special Number; 65-73Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Numero Especial; 65-731980-220X0080-6234reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108008https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108009http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Débora Cristina IgnácioLacerda, Rúbia Aparecida2016-03-22T13:28:16Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/109528Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/oai||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2016-03-22T13:28:16Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals Evaluación de los programas de control de infecciones asociadas en el cuidado de la salud Avaliação de Programas de Controle de Infecção relacionada a Assistência à Saúde de Hospitais |
title |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio |
title_short |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
title_full |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals |
author |
Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio |
author_facet |
Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida |
description |
Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (p |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528 10.1590/S0080-623420150000700010 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0080-623420150000700010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108008 https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 49 (2015): Número Especial; 65-73 Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Special Number; 65-73 Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Numero Especial; 65-73 1980-220X 0080-6234 reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||nursingscholar@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221738598924288 |