Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528
Resumo: Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (p
id USP-24_fa7ac28733cea8da76ce21f2d3d63017
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/109528
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals Evaluación de los programas de control de infecciones asociadas en el cuidado de la salud Avaliação de Programas de Controle de Infecção relacionada a Assistência à Saúde de Hospitais Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (pObjetivo Evaluar el desempeño de estos programas en los hospitales de Paraná, considerando como hipótese desempenho geral mínimo de 75%. Método Estudio transversal de la evaluación del proceso, mediante instrumento previamente validado que consta de cuatro indicadores que evalúan la estructura técnica y operativa (PECP), directrices operacionales (PCDO), el sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica (PCVE) y las actividades de control y la prevención (PCCP). El estudio se llevó a cabo desde 2013 hasta 2014 en 50 hospitales de la muestra gratuita. Resultados El cumplimiento global obtenida fue de 71,0% (23,88dp) y el indicador PECP 79,4% (18,9dp); PCVE 76,0% (30.5dp); PCDO 65,5% (26,9dp); y 63,2% PCPP/(39,5dp). Hubo un mejor rendimiento estadísticamente significativa de PCIRAS realización de auditorías internas (p=0,0099), la certificación de calidad (p=0,01949), enfermera exclusiva (pObjetivo Avaliar os Programas de Controle de Infecção em hospitais do Paraná, considerando como hipótese desempenho geral mínimo de 75%. Método Estudo transversal de avaliação processual, por meio de instrumento previamente validado, composto por quatro indicadores que avaliam a estrutura técnico-operacional (PCET), as diretrizes operacionais (PCDO), o sistema de vigilância epidemiológica (PCVE) e as atividades de controle e prevenção (PCCP). O estudo foi realizado de 2013 a 2014 em 50 hospitais por amostra de acesso. Resultados A conformidade geral obtida foi 71,0% (23,88dp), sendo indicador PCET 79,4% (18,9dp); PCVE 76,0% (30,5dp); PCDO 65,5% (26,9dp); e PCCP 63,2%/ (39,5dp). Houve significância estatística para melhor desempenho dos PCIRAS a realização de auditorias internas (p=0,0099), certificação de qualidade (p=0,01949), enfermeiro exclusivo (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/10952810.1590/S0080-623420150000700010Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 49 (2015): Número Especial; 65-73Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Special Number; 65-73Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Numero Especial; 65-731980-220X0080-6234reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108008https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108009http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Débora Cristina IgnácioLacerda, Rúbia Aparecida2016-03-22T13:28:16Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/109528Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/oai||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2016-03-22T13:28:16Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
Evaluación de los programas de control de infecciones asociadas en el cuidado de la salud
Avaliação de Programas de Controle de Infecção relacionada a Assistência à Saúde de Hospitais
title Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
spellingShingle Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio
title_short Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
title_full Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
title_fullStr Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
title_sort Evaluation of Programs of Infection Control related to Healthcare Assistance in Hospitals
author Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio
author_facet Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio
Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Débora Cristina Ignácio
Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida
description Objective To evaluate the Infection Control Programs in the state of Paraná’s hospitals, considering a hypothesis of a minimum overall performance of 75%. Method This was a cross-sectional study of procedural evaluation, using a previously established instrument comprised of four indicators that evaluate the technical-operational structure (PCET), the operational guidelines (PCDO), the system of epidemiological surveillance (PCET), and activities of control and prevention (PCCP). The study was carried out between 2013 and 2014 in 50 hospitals for the initial sample. Results The overall compliance obtained was 71.0% (23.88pd), with the indicators of PCET being 79.4% (18.9pd); PCVE 76.0% (30.5pd); PCDO 65.5% (26.9pd); and PCCP 63.2%/(39.5pd). There was statistical significance to indicate the greater performance of PCIRAS in carrying out internal audits (p=0.0099), quality certification (p=0.01949), exclusive nurses (p
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528
10.1590/S0080-623420150000700010
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0080-623420150000700010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108008
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/109528/108009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 49 (2015): Número Especial; 65-73
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Special Number; 65-73
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 49 (2015): Numero Especial; 65-73
1980-220X
0080-6234
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1800221738598924288