Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loparic, Zeljko
Data de Publicação: 1995
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia USP (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520
Resumo: The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology.
id USP-26_3c292de27b0bd99dc9560374ab5d03e8
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/34520
network_acronym_str USP-26
network_name_str Psicologia USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought Winnicott e o pensamento pós-metafísico Winnicott^i1^sDonaldWinnicott^i1^s1896-1PsicanáliseMetafísicaMetapsicologiaWinnicott^i2^sDonaldWinnicott^i2^s1896-1PsychoanalysisMetaphysicsMetapsychology The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology. O propósito do trabalho é o de esboçar uma leitura heideggeriana de Winnicott. Partindo do fato de que o convite para tratar filosoficamente certos problemas fundamentais da psicanálise vem do próprio Freud, o autor tenta mostrar que seu pensamento pode ser proveitosamente aproximado do pensamento de Winnicott. Enquanto o filósofo postula a diferença entre os múltiplos sentidos de ser das coisas do mundo e o sentido de ser do homem, o psicanalista propõe que o processo de constituição do sentido de ser, ignorado pela psicanálise tradicional, é uma tarefa que faz parte dos problemas intrínsecos ao existir humano desde o início e que essa questão não pode mais ser acomodada no interior da metafísica da representação. O texto não se propõe a estabelecer uma unidade sistemática entre os dois pensadores, senão, antes uma afinidade conceitual que se situa não apenas na área da epistemologia, mas sobretudo na da ontologia. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia1995-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/3452010.1590/S1678-51771995000200003Psicologia USP; v. 6 n. 2 (1995); 39-61Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 No. 2 (1995); 39-61Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (1995); 39-611678-51770103-6564reponame:Psicologia USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520/37258Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoparic, Zeljko2016-08-29T13:11:14Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/34520Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicouspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/oairevpsico@usp.br1678-51770103-6564opendoar:2016-08-29T13:11:14Psicologia USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
Winnicott e o pensamento pós-metafísico
title Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
spellingShingle Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
Loparic, Zeljko
Winnicott^i1^sDonald
Winnicott^i1^s1896-1
Psicanálise
Metafísica
Metapsicologia
Winnicott^i2^sDonald
Winnicott^i2^s1896-1
Psychoanalysis
Metaphysics
Metapsychology
title_short Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
title_full Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
title_fullStr Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
title_full_unstemmed Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
title_sort Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
author Loparic, Zeljko
author_facet Loparic, Zeljko
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loparic, Zeljko
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Winnicott^i1^sDonald
Winnicott^i1^s1896-1
Psicanálise
Metafísica
Metapsicologia
Winnicott^i2^sDonald
Winnicott^i2^s1896-1
Psychoanalysis
Metaphysics
Metapsychology
topic Winnicott^i1^sDonald
Winnicott^i1^s1896-1
Psicanálise
Metafísica
Metapsicologia
Winnicott^i2^sDonald
Winnicott^i2^s1896-1
Psychoanalysis
Metaphysics
Metapsychology
description The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology.
publishDate 1995
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1995-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520
10.1590/S1678-51771995000200003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-51771995000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520/37258
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USP
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USP
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia USP; v. 6 n. 2 (1995); 39-61
Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 No. 2 (1995); 39-61
Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (1995); 39-61
1678-5177
0103-6564
reponame:Psicologia USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Psicologia USP (Online)
collection Psicologia USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revpsico@usp.br
_version_ 1787713335424188416