Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1995 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia USP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology. |
id |
USP-26_3c292de27b0bd99dc9560374ab5d03e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/34520 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-26 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia USP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought Winnicott e o pensamento pós-metafísico Winnicott^i1^sDonaldWinnicott^i1^s1896-1PsicanáliseMetafísicaMetapsicologiaWinnicott^i2^sDonaldWinnicott^i2^s1896-1PsychoanalysisMetaphysicsMetapsychology The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology. O propósito do trabalho é o de esboçar uma leitura heideggeriana de Winnicott. Partindo do fato de que o convite para tratar filosoficamente certos problemas fundamentais da psicanálise vem do próprio Freud, o autor tenta mostrar que seu pensamento pode ser proveitosamente aproximado do pensamento de Winnicott. Enquanto o filósofo postula a diferença entre os múltiplos sentidos de ser das coisas do mundo e o sentido de ser do homem, o psicanalista propõe que o processo de constituição do sentido de ser, ignorado pela psicanálise tradicional, é uma tarefa que faz parte dos problemas intrínsecos ao existir humano desde o início e que essa questão não pode mais ser acomodada no interior da metafísica da representação. O texto não se propõe a estabelecer uma unidade sistemática entre os dois pensadores, senão, antes uma afinidade conceitual que se situa não apenas na área da epistemologia, mas sobretudo na da ontologia. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia1995-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/3452010.1590/S1678-51771995000200003Psicologia USP; v. 6 n. 2 (1995); 39-61Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 No. 2 (1995); 39-61Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (1995); 39-611678-51770103-6564reponame:Psicologia USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520/37258Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoparic, Zeljko2016-08-29T13:11:14Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/34520Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicouspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/oairevpsico@usp.br1678-51770103-6564opendoar:2016-08-29T13:11:14Psicologia USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought Winnicott e o pensamento pós-metafísico |
title |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
spellingShingle |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought Loparic, Zeljko Winnicott^i1^sDonald Winnicott^i1^s1896-1 Psicanálise Metafísica Metapsicologia Winnicott^i2^sDonald Winnicott^i2^s1896-1 Psychoanalysis Metaphysics Metapsychology |
title_short |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
title_full |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
title_fullStr |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
title_full_unstemmed |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
title_sort |
Winnicott and post-metaphysics thought |
author |
Loparic, Zeljko |
author_facet |
Loparic, Zeljko |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Loparic, Zeljko |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Winnicott^i1^sDonald Winnicott^i1^s1896-1 Psicanálise Metafísica Metapsicologia Winnicott^i2^sDonald Winnicott^i2^s1896-1 Psychoanalysis Metaphysics Metapsychology |
topic |
Winnicott^i1^sDonald Winnicott^i1^s1896-1 Psicanálise Metafísica Metapsicologia Winnicott^i2^sDonald Winnicott^i2^s1896-1 Psychoanalysis Metaphysics Metapsychology |
description |
The aim of this article is to sketch a Heiddegerian reading of Winnicott. Starting from the fact that the invitation to deal philosophically with fundamental problems of Psychoanalysis comes from Freud himself, the author tries to show that Heideggers ideas might be close to Winnicott's. While the philosopher presents the difference between multiple senses of being of objects and of being a man, the psychoanalyst states that 1) the process of constitution of sense of being, although it is ignored by traditional Psychoanalysis, is a task that makes part of intrinsical problems of the human being, since the very beginning; 2) this question cannot be accommodated inside the metaphysic of representation. The author does not intend to state a systematical unit between the two thinkers but only to show a conceptual affinity not only in the area of Epistemology and but also in the area of Ontology. |
publishDate |
1995 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1995-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520 10.1590/S1678-51771995000200003 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-51771995000200003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/psicousp/article/view/34520/37258 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USP info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Psicologia USP |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia USP; v. 6 n. 2 (1995); 39-61 Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 No. 2 (1995); 39-61 Psicologia USP; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (1995); 39-61 1678-5177 0103-6564 reponame:Psicologia USP (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Psicologia USP (Online) |
collection |
Psicologia USP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revpsico@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221955709730816 |