Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Eneida Bezerra Soares
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Korelo, José Carlos, Silva, Danielle Mantovani Lucena da, Prado, Paulo Henrique Muller
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/44553
Resumo: This study proposes a model to explain the innovativeness of beef cattle producers from an organizational perspective. According to the innovation dissemination theory, organizational innovativeness is the degree to which an organization innovates relatively sooner than others. To assess innovativeness, four antecedents were considered: the perceived characteristics of innovation, comprised of relative advantage, compatibility, image, result demonstrability, visibility, experimentability, voluntariness and ease of use; the participation of livestock farmers in social networks, characterized as peer relationship networks; sources of commercial information, characterized as information obtained by means of the relationships, in order to reduce risks; and organizational psychographics, consisting of direction, the centrality of decisions, open communication and motivation for achievement. The four constructs have a positive relation with organizational innovativeness. Using a non-random sample for reasons of convenience, 205 valid questionnaires were obtained. The analysis of multiple components showed that the respondents had a distinct profile concerning innovativeness. This distinguishing feature led to the creation of a taxonomy based on the technology adoption profile to identify differences in innovative behavior, which resulted in three groups. Thus, three models were analyzed and compared through structural equation modeling, using the PLS (partial least square) method. The results showed that the group of the less innovative respondents adopted innovations based the social networks, on the compatibility of the technology with their organizational activities and on the new technology's image among the other beef cattle producers. The so-called 'intermediaries' had organizational psychographics geared toward innovativeness; however, the adoption of new technologies seemed to be more related to market dictates than to a perception of the innovative features of these technologies. The most innovative group, i.e., the opinion leaders, demonstrated an organizational innovativeness profile constructed from commercial sources of information and the farmers looked upon the costs of the new technology as a positive investment in the future of the business.
id USP-27_badc778bbba98622c483a113d0e60c5d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/44553
network_acronym_str USP-27
network_name_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologiesInovatividade organizacional e seus antecedentes: um estudo aplicado às tecnologias para pecuáriaInnovación organizativa y sus antecedentes: un estudio aplicado a las tecnologías para la ganaderíaorganizational innovativenessinnovation perceptionsocial networksorganizational psychographicsinnovación organizativapercepción de la innovaciónredes socialespsicografía de la organizacióninovatividade organizacionalpercepção da inovaçãoredes sociaispsicografia organizacionalThis study proposes a model to explain the innovativeness of beef cattle producers from an organizational perspective. According to the innovation dissemination theory, organizational innovativeness is the degree to which an organization innovates relatively sooner than others. To assess innovativeness, four antecedents were considered: the perceived characteristics of innovation, comprised of relative advantage, compatibility, image, result demonstrability, visibility, experimentability, voluntariness and ease of use; the participation of livestock farmers in social networks, characterized as peer relationship networks; sources of commercial information, characterized as information obtained by means of the relationships, in order to reduce risks; and organizational psychographics, consisting of direction, the centrality of decisions, open communication and motivation for achievement. The four constructs have a positive relation with organizational innovativeness. Using a non-random sample for reasons of convenience, 205 valid questionnaires were obtained. The analysis of multiple components showed that the respondents had a distinct profile concerning innovativeness. This distinguishing feature led to the creation of a taxonomy based on the technology adoption profile to identify differences in innovative behavior, which resulted in three groups. Thus, three models were analyzed and compared through structural equation modeling, using the PLS (partial least square) method. The results showed that the group of the less innovative respondents adopted innovations based the social networks, on the compatibility of the technology with their organizational activities and on the new technology's image among the other beef cattle producers. The so-called 'intermediaries' had organizational psychographics geared toward innovativeness; however, the adoption of new technologies seemed to be more related to market dictates than to a perception of the innovative features of these technologies. The most innovative group, i.e., the opinion leaders, demonstrated an organizational innovativeness profile constructed from commercial sources of information and the farmers looked upon the costs of the new technology as a positive investment in the future of the business.Neste estudo, propõe-se um modelo para explicar a inovatividade dos pecuaristas de gado de corte sob a perspectiva organizacional. Segundo a teoria de difusão de inovações, a inovatividade organizacional é caracterizada como o grau em que uma organização inova relativamente mais cedo do que as demais. Para avaliar a inovatividade, quatro antecedentes foram considerados, sendo: as características percebidas da inovação compostas por vantagem relativa, compatibilidade, imagem, demonstração de resultado, visibilidade, experimentabilidade, voluntariedade e facilidade de uso; a participação dos pecuaristas em redes sociais, caracterizadas como redes de relacionamentos entre pares; as fontes de informação comercial, caracterizadas como informações obtidas por meio dos relacionamentos para reduzir os riscos; a psicografia organizacional, composta por direção, centralidade da decisão, abertura de comunicação e motivação para a conquista. Os quatro construtos possuem uma relação positiva com a inovatividade organizacional. Com amostragem não probabilística por conveniência, foram obtidos 205 questionários válidos. Na análise de componentes múltiplos, observou-se que o perfil dos respondentes se mostrou distinto quanto à inovatividade. Essa distinção motivou a geração de uma taxonomia com base no perfil de adoção de tecnologias com o objetivo de identificar as diferenças no comportamento inovativo, o que resultou em três grupos. Assim, três modelos foram analisados e comparados por meio da modelagem de equações estruturais, utilizando-se o método Partial Least Square (PLS). Os resultados mostraram que o grupo dos menos inovadores pauta suas decisões de adoção de novas tecnologias pelas redes sociais, pela compatibilidade da tecnologia com suas atividades organizacionais e pela imagem que ela tem perante os demais pecuaristas. Os intermediários têm uma psicografia organizacional voltada para a inovatividade, porém a adoção de novas tecnologias parece estar mais relacionada às imposições de mercado do que propriamente à percepção de suas características inovadoras. Os mais inovadores, como formadores de opinião, possuem uma inovatividade organizacional construída a partir de fontes de informação comerciais e avaliam o custo da tecnologia como um investimento positivo para o futuro de seu negócio.En este estudio se propone un modelo para explicar la innovación de los ganaderos productores de carne en la perspectiva de la organización. De acuerdo con la teoría de la difusión de innovaciones, la innovación organizativa se caracteriza por el grado en que una organización es capaz de innovar antes que las demás. Para evaluar la capacidad de innovación, cuatro antecedentes fueron considerados: las características percibidas de la innovación, definidas por ventaja relativa, compatibilidad, imagen, demostración de resultado, visibilidad, experiencia, disposición y facilidad de uso; la participación de los ganaderos en redes sociales, caracterizadas como redes de relaciones entre iguales; las fuentes de información empresarial, caracterizadas por la información obtenida por medio de relaciones para reducir el riesgo; y la psicografía de la organización compuesta por dirección, centralidad de la decisión, apertura de comunicación y motivación de logro. Las cuatro construcciones tienen una relación positiva con la innovación organizativa. Con un muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia, se obtuvieron 205 cuestionarios válidos. El análisis de componentes múltiples reveló que el perfil de los encuestados es distinto en cuanto a la capacidad de innovación. Esta distinción condujo a la generación de una taxonomía basada en el perfil de adopción de tecnologías con el fin de identificar las diferencias en el comportamiento innovador, lo que dio lugar a tres grupos. Así, se analizaron y compararon tres modelos por medio del modelado de ecuaciones estructurales, con el uso del método PLS (Partial Least Square). Los resultados mostraron que el grupo de los menos innovadores toma sus decisiones de adopción de nuevas tecnologías con base en las redes sociales, en la compatibilidad de la tecnología con sus actividades organizativas y en la imagen que ella tiene ante los otros ganaderos. Los intermediarios tienen una psicografía dirigida hacia la innovación organizativa, sin embargo la adopción de las nuevas tecnologías parece estar más relacionada con las imposiciones del mercado que con la percepción de las características innovadoras de la misma. Los más innovadores, como líderes de opinión, tienen una capacidad de innovación organizativa construida a partir de fuentes comerciales de información y evalúan el costo de la tecnología con una inversión positiva para el futuro de su negocio.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/4455310.1590/S0080-21072011000400003Revista de Administração; v. 46 n. 4 (2011); 342-357Revista de Administração; Vol. 46 No. 4 (2011); 342-357Revista de Administração; Vol. 46 Núm. 4 (2011); 342-3571984-61420080-2107reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/44553/48173Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Eneida Bezerra SoaresKorelo, José CarlosSilva, Danielle Mantovani Lucena daPrado, Paulo Henrique Muller2015-09-15T16:52:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/44553Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rauspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/oairausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br1984-61420080-2107opendoar:2015-09-15T16:52:57Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
Inovatividade organizacional e seus antecedentes: um estudo aplicado às tecnologias para pecuária
Innovación organizativa y sus antecedentes: un estudio aplicado a las tecnologías para la ganadería
title Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
spellingShingle Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
Ribeiro, Eneida Bezerra Soares
organizational innovativeness
innovation perception
social networks
organizational psychographics
innovación organizativa
percepción de la innovación
redes sociales
psicografía de la organización
inovatividade organizacional
percepção da inovação
redes sociais
psicografia organizacional
title_short Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
title_full Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
title_fullStr Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
title_full_unstemmed Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
title_sort Organizational innovativeness and its antecedents: a study of livestock farming technologies
author Ribeiro, Eneida Bezerra Soares
author_facet Ribeiro, Eneida Bezerra Soares
Korelo, José Carlos
Silva, Danielle Mantovani Lucena da
Prado, Paulo Henrique Muller
author_role author
author2 Korelo, José Carlos
Silva, Danielle Mantovani Lucena da
Prado, Paulo Henrique Muller
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Eneida Bezerra Soares
Korelo, José Carlos
Silva, Danielle Mantovani Lucena da
Prado, Paulo Henrique Muller
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv organizational innovativeness
innovation perception
social networks
organizational psychographics
innovación organizativa
percepción de la innovación
redes sociales
psicografía de la organización
inovatividade organizacional
percepção da inovação
redes sociais
psicografia organizacional
topic organizational innovativeness
innovation perception
social networks
organizational psychographics
innovación organizativa
percepción de la innovación
redes sociales
psicografía de la organización
inovatividade organizacional
percepção da inovação
redes sociais
psicografia organizacional
description This study proposes a model to explain the innovativeness of beef cattle producers from an organizational perspective. According to the innovation dissemination theory, organizational innovativeness is the degree to which an organization innovates relatively sooner than others. To assess innovativeness, four antecedents were considered: the perceived characteristics of innovation, comprised of relative advantage, compatibility, image, result demonstrability, visibility, experimentability, voluntariness and ease of use; the participation of livestock farmers in social networks, characterized as peer relationship networks; sources of commercial information, characterized as information obtained by means of the relationships, in order to reduce risks; and organizational psychographics, consisting of direction, the centrality of decisions, open communication and motivation for achievement. The four constructs have a positive relation with organizational innovativeness. Using a non-random sample for reasons of convenience, 205 valid questionnaires were obtained. The analysis of multiple components showed that the respondents had a distinct profile concerning innovativeness. This distinguishing feature led to the creation of a taxonomy based on the technology adoption profile to identify differences in innovative behavior, which resulted in three groups. Thus, three models were analyzed and compared through structural equation modeling, using the PLS (partial least square) method. The results showed that the group of the less innovative respondents adopted innovations based the social networks, on the compatibility of the technology with their organizational activities and on the new technology's image among the other beef cattle producers. The so-called 'intermediaries' had organizational psychographics geared toward innovativeness; however, the adoption of new technologies seemed to be more related to market dictates than to a perception of the innovative features of these technologies. The most innovative group, i.e., the opinion leaders, demonstrated an organizational innovativeness profile constructed from commercial sources of information and the farmers looked upon the costs of the new technology as a positive investment in the future of the business.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/44553
10.1590/S0080-21072011000400003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/44553
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0080-21072011000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/44553/48173
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração; v. 46 n. 4 (2011); 342-357
Revista de Administração; Vol. 46 No. 4 (2011); 342-357
Revista de Administração; Vol. 46 Núm. 4 (2011); 342-357
1984-6142
0080-2107
reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
collection Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br
_version_ 1800222889000042496