Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1979 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/166556 |
Resumo: | Planning at the organizational level to adapt to environmental changes can be divided into two types: the incremental or satisfying approach and the systems or rationalcomprehensive approach. The characteristics of each planning type are presented and discussed. Six factors are selected to demonstrate the fundamental differences between the two approaches to planning: assumptions about man; assumptions about organizational change; the problem of goal conflict; the problem of goal suboptimizations; the reduction of incertainty; and the power issue. Systems planning treats the planning process as being one which deals primarily with the flow of information. This approach generates information for action but tends to not link information with action. Incremental planning treats the planning process as being primarily one of negotiating for acceptable solutions. This approach tends to generate too little information for. effective action. It is concluded that the real challenge in strategic planning is to integrate the theory and method of organizational development with the planning technologies of the systems approach and the negotiated handling of power and conflict issues which is the strength of the incremental approach. |
id |
USP-27_d30152b30dcef3fc552509dced3f2f32 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/166556 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-27 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazoDuas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazoPlanning at the organizational level to adapt to environmental changes can be divided into two types: the incremental or satisfying approach and the systems or rationalcomprehensive approach. The characteristics of each planning type are presented and discussed. Six factors are selected to demonstrate the fundamental differences between the two approaches to planning: assumptions about man; assumptions about organizational change; the problem of goal conflict; the problem of goal suboptimizations; the reduction of incertainty; and the power issue. Systems planning treats the planning process as being one which deals primarily with the flow of information. This approach generates information for action but tends to not link information with action. Incremental planning treats the planning process as being primarily one of negotiating for acceptable solutions. This approach tends to generate too little information for. effective action. It is concluded that the real challenge in strategic planning is to integrate the theory and method of organizational development with the planning technologies of the systems approach and the negotiated handling of power and conflict issues which is the strength of the incremental approach.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade1979-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/16655610.1016/rausp.v14i1.166556Revista de Administração; v. 14 n. 1 (1979); 77-96Revista de Administração; Vol. 14 No. 1 (1979); 77-96Revista de Administração; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (1979); 77-961984-61420080-2107reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/166556/159243Copyright (c) 1979 Revista de Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessO'Keefe, William M.2020-02-11T18:55:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/166556Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rauspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/oairausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br1984-61420080-2107opendoar:2020-02-11T18:55:48Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
title |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
spellingShingle |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo O'Keefe, William M. |
title_short |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
title_full |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
title_fullStr |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
title_sort |
Duas abordagens do planejamento a longo prazo |
author |
O'Keefe, William M. |
author_facet |
O'Keefe, William M. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
O'Keefe, William M. |
description |
Planning at the organizational level to adapt to environmental changes can be divided into two types: the incremental or satisfying approach and the systems or rationalcomprehensive approach. The characteristics of each planning type are presented and discussed. Six factors are selected to demonstrate the fundamental differences between the two approaches to planning: assumptions about man; assumptions about organizational change; the problem of goal conflict; the problem of goal suboptimizations; the reduction of incertainty; and the power issue. Systems planning treats the planning process as being one which deals primarily with the flow of information. This approach generates information for action but tends to not link information with action. Incremental planning treats the planning process as being primarily one of negotiating for acceptable solutions. This approach tends to generate too little information for. effective action. It is concluded that the real challenge in strategic planning is to integrate the theory and method of organizational development with the planning technologies of the systems approach and the negotiated handling of power and conflict issues which is the strength of the incremental approach. |
publishDate |
1979 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1979-03-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/166556 10.1016/rausp.v14i1.166556 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/166556 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/rausp.v14i1.166556 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rausp/article/view/166556/159243 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1979 Revista de Administração info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1979 Revista de Administração |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração; v. 14 n. 1 (1979); 77-96 Revista de Administração; Vol. 14 No. 1 (1979); 77-96 Revista de Administração; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (1979); 77-96 1984-6142 0080-2107 reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração (São Paulo) |
collection |
Revista de Administração (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222890868604928 |