Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/155114 |
Resumo: | This article explores the notion of untimeliness as a defining feature of the temporal model adopted by the Weimar classicists, by Goethe in particular. It approaches the “untimely” as a premise and a practice that presupposes a movement of dissociation from the present time and from the author’s person. Based upon the article “Literary Sanscullotism” and the translation of Benvenuto Cellini’s “Life”, originally published in the journal The Hours (Die Horen), I seek to reconstruct the link between reactions to the French Revolution and reflections about authorship, and discuss the limits of Goethe’s “untimeliness” as a means for implementing artistic autonomy. |
id |
USP-28_0e6fed039ec0c25029e95ef260883ae3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/155114 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-28 |
network_name_str |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803)Contra o tempo: autoria e Revolução na obra de Goethe (1795-1803)GoetheFrench RevolutionWeimar classicismuntimelinessauthorshipGoetheRevolução Francesaclassicismo de WeimarextemporaneidadeautoriaThis article explores the notion of untimeliness as a defining feature of the temporal model adopted by the Weimar classicists, by Goethe in particular. It approaches the “untimely” as a premise and a practice that presupposes a movement of dissociation from the present time and from the author’s person. Based upon the article “Literary Sanscullotism” and the translation of Benvenuto Cellini’s “Life”, originally published in the journal The Hours (Die Horen), I seek to reconstruct the link between reactions to the French Revolution and reflections about authorship, and discuss the limits of Goethe’s “untimeliness” as a means for implementing artistic autonomy.Este artigo explora a noção de extemporaneidade tomada como um traço distintivo do modelo temporal adotado pelos classicistas de Weimar, por Goethe em particular. Concebe o “extemporâneo” como um preceito e uma prática que supõe um movimento de dissociação do tempo presente e da pessoa do autor. Com base no ensaio “Sansculottismo literário” e na tradução da “Vida” de Benvenuto Cellini, publicadas originalmente no periódico As Horas (Die Horen), procuro esboçar o elo entre a resposta à Revolução Francesa e a reflexão sobre autoria, e discutir os limites da ‘extemporaneidade” de Goethe como meio de implementar a autonomia artística.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2019-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/15511410.11606/1982-8837223726Pandaemonium Germanicum; v. 22 n. 37 (2019); 26-501982-88371414-1906reponame:Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/155114/150970Copyright (c) 2019 Pandaemonium Germanicuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVillas Bôas, Luciana2019-02-28T10:45:12Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/155114Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/pgPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||pandaemonium@usp.br1982-88371414-1906opendoar:2023-09-13T11:52:53.584764Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) Contra o tempo: autoria e Revolução na obra de Goethe (1795-1803) |
title |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
spellingShingle |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) Villas Bôas, Luciana Goethe French Revolution Weimar classicism untimeliness authorship Goethe Revolução Francesa classicismo de Weimar extemporaneidade autoria |
title_short |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
title_full |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
title_fullStr |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
title_sort |
Against the time: Authorship and Revolution in Goethe’s work (1795-1803) |
author |
Villas Bôas, Luciana |
author_facet |
Villas Bôas, Luciana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Villas Bôas, Luciana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Goethe French Revolution Weimar classicism untimeliness authorship Goethe Revolução Francesa classicismo de Weimar extemporaneidade autoria |
topic |
Goethe French Revolution Weimar classicism untimeliness authorship Goethe Revolução Francesa classicismo de Weimar extemporaneidade autoria |
description |
This article explores the notion of untimeliness as a defining feature of the temporal model adopted by the Weimar classicists, by Goethe in particular. It approaches the “untimely” as a premise and a practice that presupposes a movement of dissociation from the present time and from the author’s person. Based upon the article “Literary Sanscullotism” and the translation of Benvenuto Cellini’s “Life”, originally published in the journal The Hours (Die Horen), I seek to reconstruct the link between reactions to the French Revolution and reflections about authorship, and discuss the limits of Goethe’s “untimeliness” as a means for implementing artistic autonomy. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/155114 10.11606/1982-8837223726 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/155114 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/1982-8837223726 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/155114/150970 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pandaemonium Germanicum info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pandaemonium Germanicum |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pandaemonium Germanicum; v. 22 n. 37 (2019); 26-50 1982-8837 1414-1906 reponame:Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
collection |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||pandaemonium@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221979005943808 |