Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701 |
Resumo: | In the present work we try to reconstruct the critique of Friedrich Schlegel to the aesthetic conception of the young Herder. From the analysis of these critique we try to show that the schlegelian distinction between an "objective poetry" and another one of "interesting" character was not oriented to guarantee the radical condemnation of the modern art but rather to question Herder's commitment with a Naturalistic conception of artistic beauty. Schlegel discovered here a continuity between the two opposing positions in the Querelle and derived from this common element the inability of both positions to recreate an objective art. As we shall see at the end of these pages, Schlegel considered that the reestablishment of poetic objectivity in the modern world could only be achieved by means of a radicalization of the very subjectivist tendencies; That is, by means of an aesthetic theory that would consistently assume the need for a reflexive mediation of the totality of the poetic elements. |
id |
USP-28_4513786b4a345ad1b7a7674a7066becb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/134701 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-28 |
network_name_str |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representationLa crítica de Friedrich Schlegel a las concepciones naturalistas de la representación artísticaFriedrich Schlegelobjective poetryinteresting poetry.Friedrich Schlegelpoesía objetivapoesía interesante.In the present work we try to reconstruct the critique of Friedrich Schlegel to the aesthetic conception of the young Herder. From the analysis of these critique we try to show that the schlegelian distinction between an "objective poetry" and another one of "interesting" character was not oriented to guarantee the radical condemnation of the modern art but rather to question Herder's commitment with a Naturalistic conception of artistic beauty. Schlegel discovered here a continuity between the two opposing positions in the Querelle and derived from this common element the inability of both positions to recreate an objective art. As we shall see at the end of these pages, Schlegel considered that the reestablishment of poetic objectivity in the modern world could only be achieved by means of a radicalization of the very subjectivist tendencies; That is, by means of an aesthetic theory that would consistently assume the need for a reflexive mediation of the totality of the poetic elements.En el presente trabajo procuramos reconstruir las críticas que realiza Friedrich Schlegel a la concepción estética del joven Herder. A partir del análisis de dichas críticas se intentará demostrar que la distinción schlegeliana entre una “poesía objetiva” y otra de carácter “interesante” no se hallaba orientada a garantizar la condena radical del arte moderno sino más bien a cuestionar el compromiso de Herder con una concepción naturalista de la belleza artística. Schlegel descubría en este punto un momento de continuidad entre las dos posiciones enfrentadas en la Querelle entre los antiguos y los modernosy hacía derivar de este elemento común la incapacidad de ambas posturas para recrear un arte de carácter objetivo. Como veremos hacia el final de estas páginas, Schlegel consideraba que el restablecimiento de la objetividad poética en el marco de las nuevas condiciones que imponía la modernidad solo podía lograrse por medio de la propia radicalización delas tendencias subjetivistas; es decir, por medio de una teoría estética que asumiera de manera consecuente la necesidad de una mediación reflexiva de la totalidad de los elementos poéticos.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2017-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/13470110.11606/1982-88372032114Pandaemonium Germanicum; v. 20 n. 32 (2017); 114-1351982-88371414-1906reponame:Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701/130476https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701/146369Copyright (c) 2018 Pandaemonium Germanicuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalfione, María Verónica2018-08-23T18:12:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/134701Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/pgPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||pandaemonium@usp.br1982-88371414-1906opendoar:2023-09-13T11:52:51.757116Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation La crítica de Friedrich Schlegel a las concepciones naturalistas de la representación artística |
title |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
spellingShingle |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation Galfione, María Verónica Friedrich Schlegel objective poetry interesting poetry. Friedrich Schlegel poesía objetiva poesía interesante. |
title_short |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
title_full |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
title_fullStr |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
title_sort |
Friedrich Schlegel's critique of the naturalistic conceptions of artistic representation |
author |
Galfione, María Verónica |
author_facet |
Galfione, María Verónica |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galfione, María Verónica |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Friedrich Schlegel objective poetry interesting poetry. Friedrich Schlegel poesía objetiva poesía interesante. |
topic |
Friedrich Schlegel objective poetry interesting poetry. Friedrich Schlegel poesía objetiva poesía interesante. |
description |
In the present work we try to reconstruct the critique of Friedrich Schlegel to the aesthetic conception of the young Herder. From the analysis of these critique we try to show that the schlegelian distinction between an "objective poetry" and another one of "interesting" character was not oriented to guarantee the radical condemnation of the modern art but rather to question Herder's commitment with a Naturalistic conception of artistic beauty. Schlegel discovered here a continuity between the two opposing positions in the Querelle and derived from this common element the inability of both positions to recreate an objective art. As we shall see at the end of these pages, Schlegel considered that the reestablishment of poetic objectivity in the modern world could only be achieved by means of a radicalization of the very subjectivist tendencies; That is, by means of an aesthetic theory that would consistently assume the need for a reflexive mediation of the totality of the poetic elements. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701 10.11606/1982-88372032114 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/1982-88372032114 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701/130476 https://www.revistas.usp.br/pg/article/view/134701/146369 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pandaemonium Germanicum info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pandaemonium Germanicum |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pandaemonium Germanicum; v. 20 n. 32 (2017); 114-135 1982-8837 1414-1906 reponame:Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
collection |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pandaemonium Germanicum (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||pandaemonium@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221978492141568 |