Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmitt, Priscila de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fischer, Ana Flávia, Lucinda da Silva, Ruth Meri, Bella Cruz, Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/204187
Resumo: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of nonionic surfactants on the effectiveness of preservatives used in emulsions containing high surfactant content. Mixtures of different concentrations were prepared between polyethoxylated (40) hydrogenated castor oil (PHCO) and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (PSO), with methylparaben, phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, and isobutylparaben (PMEPBI) blend, phenoxyethanol and benzoic acid (BP) blend, and phenoxyethanol and caprylyl glycol (PC) blend. Subsequently, the compatibility of the formulation ingredients and the effectiveness of the preservatives were evaluated by the challenge test. It was found that PHCO and PSO inactivated the antimicrobial action of methylparaben and PMEPBI. Paraben-free preservatives BP and PC had less influence on surfactants than systems containing parabens. When incorporated into microemulsions and nanoemulsions containing 40% and 20% surfactants, methylparaben and BP 0.2% and 0.5% were only effective against Aspergillus niger. The PMEPBI 0.2% was effective as a preservative in nanoemulsified formulations against A. niger, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. The results demonstrate that the efficacy of the preservative system in formulations containing nonionic surfactant excipients depends on the type of excipient, the components of the formulation, the preservative systems composition, the excipient to preservative ratio, and the availability in the formulation.
id USP-31_cb13b81613be50eebad1ebbaa2a4a9c8
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/204187
network_acronym_str USP-31
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant contentMicroemulsionNanocompositionFormulationExcipientStabilityThe objective of this study was to determine the influence of nonionic surfactants on the effectiveness of preservatives used in emulsions containing high surfactant content. Mixtures of different concentrations were prepared between polyethoxylated (40) hydrogenated castor oil (PHCO) and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (PSO), with methylparaben, phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, and isobutylparaben (PMEPBI) blend, phenoxyethanol and benzoic acid (BP) blend, and phenoxyethanol and caprylyl glycol (PC) blend. Subsequently, the compatibility of the formulation ingredients and the effectiveness of the preservatives were evaluated by the challenge test. It was found that PHCO and PSO inactivated the antimicrobial action of methylparaben and PMEPBI. Paraben-free preservatives BP and PC had less influence on surfactants than systems containing parabens. When incorporated into microemulsions and nanoemulsions containing 40% and 20% surfactants, methylparaben and BP 0.2% and 0.5% were only effective against Aspergillus niger. The PMEPBI 0.2% was effective as a preservative in nanoemulsified formulations against A. niger, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. The results demonstrate that the efficacy of the preservative system in formulations containing nonionic surfactant excipients depends on the type of excipient, the components of the formulation, the preservative systems composition, the excipient to preservative ratio, and the availability in the formulation.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas2022-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/20418710.1590/s2175-97902022e191088 Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Vol. 58 (2022)Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; v. 58 (2022)Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Vol. 58 (2022)2175-97901984-8250reponame:Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciencesinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/204187/194832Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchmitt, Priscila de OliveiraFischer, Ana FláviaLucinda da Silva, Ruth MeriBella Cruz, Alexandre2023-06-06T13:06:42Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/204187Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjps@usp.br||elizabeth.igne@gmail.com2175-97901984-8250opendoar:2023-06-06T13:06:42Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
title Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
spellingShingle Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
Schmitt, Priscila de Oliveira
Microemulsion
Nanocomposition
Formulation
Excipient
Stability
title_short Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
title_full Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
title_fullStr Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
title_sort Compatibility and efficiency of preservatives in emulsive cosmetics containing high surfactant content
author Schmitt, Priscila de Oliveira
author_facet Schmitt, Priscila de Oliveira
Fischer, Ana Flávia
Lucinda da Silva, Ruth Meri
Bella Cruz, Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Fischer, Ana Flávia
Lucinda da Silva, Ruth Meri
Bella Cruz, Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmitt, Priscila de Oliveira
Fischer, Ana Flávia
Lucinda da Silva, Ruth Meri
Bella Cruz, Alexandre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microemulsion
Nanocomposition
Formulation
Excipient
Stability
topic Microemulsion
Nanocomposition
Formulation
Excipient
Stability
description The objective of this study was to determine the influence of nonionic surfactants on the effectiveness of preservatives used in emulsions containing high surfactant content. Mixtures of different concentrations were prepared between polyethoxylated (40) hydrogenated castor oil (PHCO) and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (PSO), with methylparaben, phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, and isobutylparaben (PMEPBI) blend, phenoxyethanol and benzoic acid (BP) blend, and phenoxyethanol and caprylyl glycol (PC) blend. Subsequently, the compatibility of the formulation ingredients and the effectiveness of the preservatives were evaluated by the challenge test. It was found that PHCO and PSO inactivated the antimicrobial action of methylparaben and PMEPBI. Paraben-free preservatives BP and PC had less influence on surfactants than systems containing parabens. When incorporated into microemulsions and nanoemulsions containing 40% and 20% surfactants, methylparaben and BP 0.2% and 0.5% were only effective against Aspergillus niger. The PMEPBI 0.2% was effective as a preservative in nanoemulsified formulations against A. niger, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. The results demonstrate that the efficacy of the preservative system in formulations containing nonionic surfactant excipients depends on the type of excipient, the components of the formulation, the preservative systems composition, the excipient to preservative ratio, and the availability in the formulation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/204187
10.1590/s2175-97902022e191088
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/204187
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s2175-97902022e191088
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjps/article/view/204187/194832
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Vol. 58 (2022)
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; v. 58 (2022)
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Vol. 58 (2022)
2175-9790
1984-8250
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjps@usp.br||elizabeth.igne@gmail.com
_version_ 1800222915708321792