THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Paulo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Loiola, Elisabeth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412
Resumo: Assuming a fixed total R&D budget, the product pipeline management (PPM) problem has two parts: (1) Which and how many projects should be initiated? (2) Which projects should continue to be invested in or terminated?We use a dynamic model calibrated to a pharmaceutical company to study PPM, focusing on three types of heuristics—gradual increase or decrease, random-normal choice, and target-based search—to evaluate the impact of the introduction of innovation projects in the pipeline on the performance in R&D.We find that a gradual decrease of project introduction rates results in convergence, but the size of the adjustments and delays in the pipeline can limit the precision of the results. A random choice is detrimental to performance even when the average value is the optimal. A target-based search results in oscillation. The results of our analysis show that the specific problem of choosing the project introduction rate can be significantly improved by using an adequate rule of thumb or heuristic.
id USP-40_09699b3eadb70e49cdbf02385d2644d3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/114412
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCESystem dynamicsProduct portfolio managementProduct pipeline managementHeuristicsBehavioural operations managementPharmaceutical industryAssuming a fixed total R&D budget, the product pipeline management (PPM) problem has two parts: (1) Which and how many projects should be initiated? (2) Which projects should continue to be invested in or terminated?We use a dynamic model calibrated to a pharmaceutical company to study PPM, focusing on three types of heuristics—gradual increase or decrease, random-normal choice, and target-based search—to evaluate the impact of the introduction of innovation projects in the pipeline on the performance in R&D.We find that a gradual decrease of project introduction rates results in convergence, but the size of the adjustments and delays in the pipeline can limit the precision of the results. A random choice is detrimental to performance even when the average value is the optimal. A target-based search results in oscillation. The results of our analysis show that the specific problem of choosing the project introduction rate can be significantly improved by using an adequate rule of thumb or heuristic.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2017-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 14 n. 2 (2017); 151-1612515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412/130493Figueiredo, PauloLoiola, Elisabethinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-08-08T13:15:35Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/114412Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2018-08-08T13:15:35Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
title THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
spellingShingle THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
Figueiredo, Paulo
System dynamics
Product portfolio management
Product pipeline management
Heuristics
Behavioural operations management
Pharmaceutical industry
title_short THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
title_full THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
title_fullStr THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
title_full_unstemmed THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
title_sort THE IMPACT OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION HEURISTICS ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
author Figueiredo, Paulo
author_facet Figueiredo, Paulo
Loiola, Elisabeth
author_role author
author2 Loiola, Elisabeth
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, Paulo
Loiola, Elisabeth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv System dynamics
Product portfolio management
Product pipeline management
Heuristics
Behavioural operations management
Pharmaceutical industry
topic System dynamics
Product portfolio management
Product pipeline management
Heuristics
Behavioural operations management
Pharmaceutical industry
description Assuming a fixed total R&D budget, the product pipeline management (PPM) problem has two parts: (1) Which and how many projects should be initiated? (2) Which projects should continue to be invested in or terminated?We use a dynamic model calibrated to a pharmaceutical company to study PPM, focusing on three types of heuristics—gradual increase or decrease, random-normal choice, and target-based search—to evaluate the impact of the introduction of innovation projects in the pipeline on the performance in R&D.We find that a gradual decrease of project introduction rates results in convergence, but the size of the adjustments and delays in the pipeline can limit the precision of the results. A random choice is detrimental to performance even when the average value is the optimal. A target-based search results in oscillation. The results of our analysis show that the specific problem of choosing the project introduction rate can be significantly improved by using an adequate rule of thumb or heuristic.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114412/130493
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 14 n. 2 (2017); 151-161
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937241161728