An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ondiek, Mary Auma
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Moturi, Christopher
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/166089
Resumo: Purpose – There has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya. Findings – The research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries. Research limitations/implications – The study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated. Practical implications – The study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion. Originality/value – The findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya
id USP-40_1c778c12448c41812098e8fc69f82263
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/166089
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in KenyaSustainable innovationLiving labsInnovation ecosystemInnovation labInnovation spaceUser-driven innovationPurpose – There has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya. Findings – The research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries. Research limitations/implications – The study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated. Practical implications – The study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion. Originality/value – The findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the KenyaUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2019-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/16608910.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 16 n. 4 (2019); 391-4032515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/166089/158934Ondiek, Mary AumaMoturi, Christopherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-11-05T05:05:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/166089Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2020-11-05T05:05:47Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
title An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
spellingShingle An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
Ondiek, Mary Auma
Sustainable innovation
Living labs
Innovation ecosystem
Innovation lab
Innovation space
User-driven innovation
title_short An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
title_full An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
title_fullStr An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
title_sort An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
author Ondiek, Mary Auma
author_facet Ondiek, Mary Auma
Moturi, Christopher
author_role author
author2 Moturi, Christopher
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ondiek, Mary Auma
Moturi, Christopher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainable innovation
Living labs
Innovation ecosystem
Innovation lab
Innovation space
User-driven innovation
topic Sustainable innovation
Living labs
Innovation ecosystem
Innovation lab
Innovation space
User-driven innovation
description Purpose – There has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya. Findings – The research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries. Research limitations/implications – The study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated. Practical implications – The study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion. Originality/value – The findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/166089
10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/166089
identifier_str_mv 10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/166089/158934
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 16 n. 4 (2019); 391-403
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937360699392