Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Braga, Juliany Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/207215
Resumo: Purpose – Literature on eco-innovation brings insights that help to understand which factors triggerinnovation focused on sustainability in companies. However, when analyzing the studies that comprise suchdrivers, it appears that most of them were focused only on describing them in isolation. Therefore, this studyaims to understand which are the combinations of drivers that favor the adoption of eco-innovation inslaughterhouses located in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul.Design/methodology/approach – This study has used the crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis(csQCA) as the data analysis technique, in addition to the previous application of Most Similar DifferentOutcome/Most Different Same Outcome (MSDO/MDSO).Findings – This study identified eight internal and external drivers that explain the differences inperformance of eco-innovative and non-innovative slaughterhouses. These drivers generate 13 combinationsof factors capable of favoring the adoption of five types of eco-innovation.Research limitations/implications – A limitation identified was the difficulty to obtain informationheld by companies on environmental issues. In addition, in each company the authors only approached onerespondent.Practical implications – The use of combinations is identified by companies and governmental and nongovernmental organizations to promote eco-innovation in slaughterhouses.Originality/value – This study may be considered original for its contribution to the improvement of ecoinnovation literature by describing how the drivers identified combine to favor the adoption of certain types ofeco-innovation. In addition, the authors also made an original use of csQCA, linked with MSDO/MDSO, in thefield of eco-innovation.
id USP-40_7cd011c04e4c85deba086a2c6ee62d42
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/207215
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhousesEco-innovationDriversEco-innovation typesQualitative comparative analysisPurpose – Literature on eco-innovation brings insights that help to understand which factors triggerinnovation focused on sustainability in companies. However, when analyzing the studies that comprise suchdrivers, it appears that most of them were focused only on describing them in isolation. Therefore, this studyaims to understand which are the combinations of drivers that favor the adoption of eco-innovation inslaughterhouses located in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul.Design/methodology/approach – This study has used the crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis(csQCA) as the data analysis technique, in addition to the previous application of Most Similar DifferentOutcome/Most Different Same Outcome (MSDO/MDSO).Findings – This study identified eight internal and external drivers that explain the differences inperformance of eco-innovative and non-innovative slaughterhouses. These drivers generate 13 combinationsof factors capable of favoring the adoption of five types of eco-innovation.Research limitations/implications – A limitation identified was the difficulty to obtain informationheld by companies on environmental issues. In addition, in each company the authors only approached onerespondent.Practical implications – The use of combinations is identified by companies and governmental and nongovernmental organizations to promote eco-innovation in slaughterhouses.Originality/value – This study may be considered original for its contribution to the improvement of ecoinnovation literature by describing how the drivers identified combine to favor the adoption of certain types ofeco-innovation. In addition, the authors also made an original use of csQCA, linked with MSDO/MDSO, in thefield of eco-innovation.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2023-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/20721510.1108/INMR-07-2020-0094INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 19 n. 4 (2022); 306-3212515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/207215/190568https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Marcelo Fernandes PachecoBraga, Juliany Souza2023-01-27T02:19:23Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/207215Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2023-01-27T02:19:23Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
title Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
spellingShingle Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
Dias, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco
Eco-innovation
Drivers
Eco-innovation types
Qualitative comparative analysis
title_short Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
title_full Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
title_fullStr Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
title_full_unstemmed Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
title_sort Combinatorial analysis of eco-innovation drivers in slaughterhouses
author Dias, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco
author_facet Dias, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco
Braga, Juliany Souza
author_role author
author2 Braga, Juliany Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco
Braga, Juliany Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eco-innovation
Drivers
Eco-innovation types
Qualitative comparative analysis
topic Eco-innovation
Drivers
Eco-innovation types
Qualitative comparative analysis
description Purpose – Literature on eco-innovation brings insights that help to understand which factors triggerinnovation focused on sustainability in companies. However, when analyzing the studies that comprise suchdrivers, it appears that most of them were focused only on describing them in isolation. Therefore, this studyaims to understand which are the combinations of drivers that favor the adoption of eco-innovation inslaughterhouses located in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul.Design/methodology/approach – This study has used the crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis(csQCA) as the data analysis technique, in addition to the previous application of Most Similar DifferentOutcome/Most Different Same Outcome (MSDO/MDSO).Findings – This study identified eight internal and external drivers that explain the differences inperformance of eco-innovative and non-innovative slaughterhouses. These drivers generate 13 combinationsof factors capable of favoring the adoption of five types of eco-innovation.Research limitations/implications – A limitation identified was the difficulty to obtain informationheld by companies on environmental issues. In addition, in each company the authors only approached onerespondent.Practical implications – The use of combinations is identified by companies and governmental and nongovernmental organizations to promote eco-innovation in slaughterhouses.Originality/value – This study may be considered original for its contribution to the improvement of ecoinnovation literature by describing how the drivers identified combine to favor the adoption of certain types ofeco-innovation. In addition, the authors also made an original use of csQCA, linked with MSDO/MDSO, in thefield of eco-innovation.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/207215
10.1108/INMR-07-2020-0094
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/207215
identifier_str_mv 10.1108/INMR-07-2020-0094
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/207215/190568
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 19 n. 4 (2022); 306-321
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937818927104