ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração e Inovação |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342 |
Resumo: | The resources invested in research do not guarantee an immediate practical application. Companies and government increasingly seek mechanisms for prioritizing R&D projects appropriately when resources are insufficient. This study’s objective was to develop and present a methodology used to evaluate the portfolio of research and help choosing the best investments in research. This methodology was applied at the Butanta Institute, in Brazil, an organization responsible for researching and developing, among other medicines, vaccines and other chemicals, Onco BCG, a medication for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the article, we present and analyze the methodology used at Butanta Institute. Conclusions show that literature on R&D portfolio management advises the use of risk and return criteria, when choosing among projects. In the case study of Butanta, the methodology of choice was based more on the customer’s perspective. |
id |
USP-40_a20ef6e462f28190ef37d6a0497daa82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/101342 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-40 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTSR&DPortfolio managementTechnology strategyThe resources invested in research do not guarantee an immediate practical application. Companies and government increasingly seek mechanisms for prioritizing R&D projects appropriately when resources are insufficient. This study’s objective was to develop and present a methodology used to evaluate the portfolio of research and help choosing the best investments in research. This methodology was applied at the Butanta Institute, in Brazil, an organization responsible for researching and developing, among other medicines, vaccines and other chemicals, Onco BCG, a medication for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the article, we present and analyze the methodology used at Butanta Institute. Conclusions show that literature on R&D portfolio management advises the use of risk and return criteria, when choosing among projects. In the case study of Butanta, the methodology of choice was based more on the customer’s perspective.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2016-09-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 13 n. 3 (2016); 199-2102515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342/118015Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro GondimMuritiba, SérgioPrado, Sally Muller AffonsoVancetto, Mary Dalva CaparrozMorilha Muritiba, Patriciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-04-25T15:29:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/101342Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2018-04-25T15:29:58Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
title |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
spellingShingle |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim R&D Portfolio management Technology strategy |
title_short |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
title_full |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
title_fullStr |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
title_sort |
ANALYZING R&D PROJECTS ON HEALTH PRODUCTS |
author |
Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim |
author_facet |
Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim Muritiba, Sérgio Prado, Sally Muller Affonso Vancetto, Mary Dalva Caparroz Morilha Muritiba, Patricia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Muritiba, Sérgio Prado, Sally Muller Affonso Vancetto, Mary Dalva Caparroz Morilha Muritiba, Patricia |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim Muritiba, Sérgio Prado, Sally Muller Affonso Vancetto, Mary Dalva Caparroz Morilha Muritiba, Patricia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
R&D Portfolio management Technology strategy |
topic |
R&D Portfolio management Technology strategy |
description |
The resources invested in research do not guarantee an immediate practical application. Companies and government increasingly seek mechanisms for prioritizing R&D projects appropriately when resources are insufficient. This study’s objective was to develop and present a methodology used to evaluate the portfolio of research and help choosing the best investments in research. This methodology was applied at the Butanta Institute, in Brazil, an organization responsible for researching and developing, among other medicines, vaccines and other chemicals, Onco BCG, a medication for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the article, we present and analyze the methodology used at Butanta Institute. Conclusions show that literature on R&D portfolio management advises the use of risk and return criteria, when choosing among projects. In the case study of Butanta, the methodology of choice was based more on the customer’s perspective. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101342/118015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 13 n. 3 (2016); 199-210 2515-8961 reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
collection |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org |
_version_ |
1800221936623550464 |