Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/191592
Resumo: AbstractPurpose – This paper aims to identify and analyze the agtech classification and categorization systems inthe Brazilian context.Design/methodology/approach – The systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out according to theprotocol of Kitchenham and Charters (2007). The classification systems found in literature were evaluated using thethinking aloud protocol, as proposed by Ericsson and Simon (1993). The responses obtained were evaluatedthrough lexicographic analysis, described by Bécue-Bertaut (2019) and content analysis, described by Bardin (2011).Findings – SLR identified four agtech classification systems. The model proposed by Dias, Jardim, and Sakuda(2019) was the one with the highest adherence to classify Brazilian agtechs. From the analysis of the systems foundin literature, the authors proposed a new categorization model of agricultural startups (agtechs).Research limitations/implications – The study has limitations in relation to the theoretical and empiricalvalidation of the model proposed by the authors. This limitation can be the subject of subsequent research.Practical implications – The SLR study considers the evolution of the classification systems of a newagribusiness reality, the agtechs. In addition, there is a practical contribution in proposing a new classificationsystem that attempts to address some of the limitations found in previous studies.Originality/value – Agtechs are startups focused on developing solutions for agriculture and have showna significant increase in recent years. However, there are few studies focused on this type of company. Evenrarer are the studies that seek to classify and categorize them. The present work opens the horizon for futurestudies focused on this new reality.
id USP-40_a5499c3effa527ec25b3fe0f50defa8e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/191592
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)EntrepreneurshipAgribusinessInnovationStartupsAgtechsAbstractPurpose – This paper aims to identify and analyze the agtech classification and categorization systems inthe Brazilian context.Design/methodology/approach – The systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out according to theprotocol of Kitchenham and Charters (2007). The classification systems found in literature were evaluated using thethinking aloud protocol, as proposed by Ericsson and Simon (1993). The responses obtained were evaluatedthrough lexicographic analysis, described by Bécue-Bertaut (2019) and content analysis, described by Bardin (2011).Findings – SLR identified four agtech classification systems. The model proposed by Dias, Jardim, and Sakuda(2019) was the one with the highest adherence to classify Brazilian agtechs. From the analysis of the systems foundin literature, the authors proposed a new categorization model of agricultural startups (agtechs).Research limitations/implications – The study has limitations in relation to the theoretical and empiricalvalidation of the model proposed by the authors. This limitation can be the subject of subsequent research.Practical implications – The SLR study considers the evolution of the classification systems of a newagribusiness reality, the agtechs. In addition, there is a practical contribution in proposing a new classificationsystem that attempts to address some of the limitations found in previous studies.Originality/value – Agtechs are startups focused on developing solutions for agriculture and have showna significant increase in recent years. However, there are few studies focused on this type of company. Evenrarer are the studies that seek to classify and categorize them. The present work opens the horizon for futurestudies focused on this new reality.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2021-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/19159210.1108/INMR-12-2019-0160INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 18 n. 03 (2021); 237-2542515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/191592/176527https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira 2021-10-20T20:21:46Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/191592Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2021-10-20T20:21:46Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
title Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
spellingShingle Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
Ramos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci
Entrepreneurship
Agribusiness
Innovation
Startups
Agtechs
title_short Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
title_full Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
title_fullStr Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
title_full_unstemmed Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
title_sort Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs)
author Ramos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci
author_facet Ramos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci
Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira
author_role author
author2 Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Paulo Henrique Bertucci
Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Entrepreneurship
Agribusiness
Innovation
Startups
Agtechs
topic Entrepreneurship
Agribusiness
Innovation
Startups
Agtechs
description AbstractPurpose – This paper aims to identify and analyze the agtech classification and categorization systems inthe Brazilian context.Design/methodology/approach – The systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out according to theprotocol of Kitchenham and Charters (2007). The classification systems found in literature were evaluated using thethinking aloud protocol, as proposed by Ericsson and Simon (1993). The responses obtained were evaluatedthrough lexicographic analysis, described by Bécue-Bertaut (2019) and content analysis, described by Bardin (2011).Findings – SLR identified four agtech classification systems. The model proposed by Dias, Jardim, and Sakuda(2019) was the one with the highest adherence to classify Brazilian agtechs. From the analysis of the systems foundin literature, the authors proposed a new categorization model of agricultural startups (agtechs).Research limitations/implications – The study has limitations in relation to the theoretical and empiricalvalidation of the model proposed by the authors. This limitation can be the subject of subsequent research.Practical implications – The SLR study considers the evolution of the classification systems of a newagribusiness reality, the agtechs. In addition, there is a practical contribution in proposing a new classificationsystem that attempts to address some of the limitations found in previous studies.Originality/value – Agtechs are startups focused on developing solutions for agriculture and have showna significant increase in recent years. However, there are few studies focused on this type of company. Evenrarer are the studies that seek to classify and categorize them. The present work opens the horizon for futurestudies focused on this new reality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/191592
10.1108/INMR-12-2019-0160
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/191592
identifier_str_mv 10.1108/INMR-12-2019-0160
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/191592/176527
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 18 n. 03 (2021); 237-254
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937764401152