ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Gutemberg
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences between what the theory shows about the importance of the environment in the innovation and what can be found in its results of empirical research. The environment, although very important, is treated as a whole, not allowing the possible environmental configurations, which have different characteristics, to be identified. The general approach to the environment on innovation, particularly in the selection of innovation indicators, causes a gap between theory and practice. Through research reports and secondary data and bibliometric analysis it is observed that the selection of innovation indicators is not aligned to the environmental context, which may cause deviations in measurement. The literature review on innovation and environment and an analysis of empirical approach studies, especially secondary and bibliometric data were explored in this study. By examining the differences between theory and practice of research, it is concluded that there are no studies relating the selection of innovation indicators for the environment and that the generic approach results have no reliability. As a contribution, it is presented a model that allows one to analyze the environment in choosing the most appropriate indicators to measure innovation in order to reduce the identified differences.
id USP-40_ac908c2f11a8f881d61c9459846831a9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/114449
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICEEnvironmentEnvironmental contextInnovationIndicatorsInnovation indicatorsThe purpose of this paper is to explore the differences between what the theory shows about the importance of the environment in the innovation and what can be found in its results of empirical research. The environment, although very important, is treated as a whole, not allowing the possible environmental configurations, which have different characteristics, to be identified. The general approach to the environment on innovation, particularly in the selection of innovation indicators, causes a gap between theory and practice. Through research reports and secondary data and bibliometric analysis it is observed that the selection of innovation indicators is not aligned to the environmental context, which may cause deviations in measurement. The literature review on innovation and environment and an analysis of empirical approach studies, especially secondary and bibliometric data were explored in this study. By examining the differences between theory and practice of research, it is concluded that there are no studies relating the selection of innovation indicators for the environment and that the generic approach results have no reliability. As a contribution, it is presented a model that allows one to analyze the environment in choosing the most appropriate indicators to measure innovation in order to reduce the identified differences.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2017-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 14 n. 1 (2017); 30-402515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449/129485Ribeiro, GutembergCherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szaboinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-08-08T13:15:49Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/114449Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2018-08-08T13:15:49Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
title ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
spellingShingle ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
Ribeiro, Gutemberg
Environment
Environmental context
Innovation
Indicators
Innovation indicators
title_short ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
title_full ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
title_fullStr ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
title_full_unstemmed ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
title_sort ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
author Ribeiro, Gutemberg
author_facet Ribeiro, Gutemberg
Cherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo
author_role author
author2 Cherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Gutemberg
Cherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environment
Environmental context
Innovation
Indicators
Innovation indicators
topic Environment
Environmental context
Innovation
Indicators
Innovation indicators
description The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences between what the theory shows about the importance of the environment in the innovation and what can be found in its results of empirical research. The environment, although very important, is treated as a whole, not allowing the possible environmental configurations, which have different characteristics, to be identified. The general approach to the environment on innovation, particularly in the selection of innovation indicators, causes a gap between theory and practice. Through research reports and secondary data and bibliometric analysis it is observed that the selection of innovation indicators is not aligned to the environmental context, which may cause deviations in measurement. The literature review on innovation and environment and an analysis of empirical approach studies, especially secondary and bibliometric data were explored in this study. By examining the differences between theory and practice of research, it is concluded that there are no studies relating the selection of innovation indicators for the environment and that the generic approach results have no reliability. As a contribution, it is presented a model that allows one to analyze the environment in choosing the most appropriate indicators to measure innovation in order to reduce the identified differences.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/114449/129485
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 14 n. 1 (2017); 30-40
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937243258880