Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração e Inovação |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177214 |
Resumo: | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to observe how to invest in upper-middle income countries via an innovation perspective following global innovation index (GII) by multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) approach, once MCDA was designed to support subjective decisions. Design/methodology/approach – Pearson’s correlation was the milestone for understanding innovation indicators at upper-middle income countries profiles. In a MCDA first step, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to obtain the criteria weight. In this step, the judgments or evaluations inputted in AHP were collected from a sample composed by five experts in GII. After getting the criteria weights compose to GII, Borda and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMÉTHÉE) methods were applied to obtain an MCDA-based GII. The inputs for this second step were: the weights come from AHP output; and the countries performance came from GII data. Findings – As a result, it was found out the upper-middle countries’ rank to invest and groups with countries acting like “hubs” or “bridges” for economic sectors in near countries; when they are grouped according to their maximum and minimum scores profiles, observing not only a particular region but also similar profiles at diverse world areas. Originality/value – Pearson-AHP-PROMÉTHÉE works as a supportive decision tool for several and complex investment perspectives from criteria and alternatives analysis regarding innovation indicators for upper-middle income countries. This combination also demonstrates grouping possibilities, aligning profiles and not only ranking countries for investment and eliminating others but also grouping countries with similar profiles via innovation indicators MCDA combined application. |
id |
USP-40_c88b904ac3be20e357cabf47e8649229 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/177214 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-40 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countriesMCDAAHPGlobal innovation indexPearsonWorld intellectual property organizationPROMÉTHÉEPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to observe how to invest in upper-middle income countries via an innovation perspective following global innovation index (GII) by multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) approach, once MCDA was designed to support subjective decisions. Design/methodology/approach – Pearson’s correlation was the milestone for understanding innovation indicators at upper-middle income countries profiles. In a MCDA first step, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to obtain the criteria weight. In this step, the judgments or evaluations inputted in AHP were collected from a sample composed by five experts in GII. After getting the criteria weights compose to GII, Borda and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMÉTHÉE) methods were applied to obtain an MCDA-based GII. The inputs for this second step were: the weights come from AHP output; and the countries performance came from GII data. Findings – As a result, it was found out the upper-middle countries’ rank to invest and groups with countries acting like “hubs” or “bridges” for economic sectors in near countries; when they are grouped according to their maximum and minimum scores profiles, observing not only a particular region but also similar profiles at diverse world areas. Originality/value – Pearson-AHP-PROMÉTHÉE works as a supportive decision tool for several and complex investment perspectives from criteria and alternatives analysis regarding innovation indicators for upper-middle income countries. This combination also demonstrates grouping possibilities, aligning profiles and not only ranking countries for investment and eliminating others but also grouping countries with similar profiles via innovation indicators MCDA combined application.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2020-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/17721410.1108/INMR-02-2019-0016INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 17 n. 3 (2020); 321;3471809-2039reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marcela do CarmoHelder, HelderSimões Gomes, Carlos Francisco2020-11-05T21:18:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/177214Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2020-11-05T21:18:28Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
title |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
spellingShingle |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries Silva, Marcela do Carmo MCDA AHP Global innovation index Pearson World intellectual property organization PROMÉTHÉE |
title_short |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
title_full |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
title_fullStr |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
title_sort |
Multicriteria decision choices for investment in innovative upper-middle income countries |
author |
Silva, Marcela do Carmo |
author_facet |
Silva, Marcela do Carmo Helder, Helder Simões Gomes, Carlos Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Helder, Helder Simões Gomes, Carlos Francisco |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marcela do Carmo Helder, Helder Simões Gomes, Carlos Francisco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MCDA AHP Global innovation index Pearson World intellectual property organization PROMÉTHÉE |
topic |
MCDA AHP Global innovation index Pearson World intellectual property organization PROMÉTHÉE |
description |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to observe how to invest in upper-middle income countries via an innovation perspective following global innovation index (GII) by multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) approach, once MCDA was designed to support subjective decisions. Design/methodology/approach – Pearson’s correlation was the milestone for understanding innovation indicators at upper-middle income countries profiles. In a MCDA first step, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to obtain the criteria weight. In this step, the judgments or evaluations inputted in AHP were collected from a sample composed by five experts in GII. After getting the criteria weights compose to GII, Borda and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMÉTHÉE) methods were applied to obtain an MCDA-based GII. The inputs for this second step were: the weights come from AHP output; and the countries performance came from GII data. Findings – As a result, it was found out the upper-middle countries’ rank to invest and groups with countries acting like “hubs” or “bridges” for economic sectors in near countries; when they are grouped according to their maximum and minimum scores profiles, observing not only a particular region but also similar profiles at diverse world areas. Originality/value – Pearson-AHP-PROMÉTHÉE works as a supportive decision tool for several and complex investment perspectives from criteria and alternatives analysis regarding innovation indicators for upper-middle income countries. This combination also demonstrates grouping possibilities, aligning profiles and not only ranking countries for investment and eliminating others but also grouping countries with similar profiles via innovation indicators MCDA combined application. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177214 10.1108/INMR-02-2019-0016 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177214 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1108/INMR-02-2019-0016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 17 n. 3 (2020); 321;347 1809-2039 reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
collection |
Revista de Administração e Inovação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org |
_version_ |
1748936698132168704 |