A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1963 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/43252 |
Resumo: | The authors carried out 3 experiments on the sampling of sugar cane for technological determinations, one with each of the varieties Co 419, CB 40-69 and CB 41-58, in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brasil. The main intent of the project was to compare 2 methods of sampling, namely: 1) Method A, where the sample is a hill (CATANI et al, 1959) or, more generally, 20 stalks all together in a randomly selected point of the furrow; 2) Method B, where 20 stalks are taken, from 20 points evenly spread but on the whole plot. Coefficients of variation for 20 stalk samples Variety Characteristic 20 stalks per hill 1 stalk per hill Brix 4.8% 1.9% Pol 6.4% 2.5% CB 40-69 Coefficient of purity 2.1% 0.83% Available sucrose 7.3% 2.7% Weight 6.6% 6.9% Brix 5.3% 1.8% Pol 7.6% 2.6% Co 419 Coefficient of purity 2.9% 1.0% Available sucrose 8.6% 3.0% Weight 21.2% 6.5% Brix 2.8% 1.4% Pol 4.1% 1.9% CB 41-58 Coefficient of purity 1.8% 0.8% Available sucrose 5.0% 2.2% Weight 10.9% 6.2% For the 3 varieties studied and for the data on Brix, pol, coefficient of purity, available sucrose and weight, analyses of variance were carried out. Further computations led to the following coefficients of variation. For available sucrose, which is probably the most important characteristic studied, the average coefficient of variation for the 3 varieties was 2.7%, for the case of method B, that is, 20 stalk samples, one stalk per hill. Assuming this coefficient of variation, in a trial with 5 treatments and 6 replications, in randomised blocks, the least significant difference among treatment means, at the 5% level, would be 4.7% of available sucrose by Tukey's test, and 3.3% by the t test. For the case of method A the average coefficient of variation is 7.0% and, in similar conditions, the least significant difference would be 15.1% by Tukey's test, and 12.1% by the t test. Since differences of available sucrose among treatments in experiments with fertilizers seldom are higher than 3 or 4% of the mean (PIMENTEL GOMES & CARDOSO, 1958), method B with a 20 stalk sample per plot gives more or less the minimum amount of cane to be sampled for technological determinations. In experiments with varieties, however, where differences may be assumed to be higher, a sample of 10 to 20 stalks one per hill, can be enough. |
id |
USP-46_2eefa86c3b5db0dd21b22e60551e6acf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/43252 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-46 |
network_name_str |
Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicasThe authors carried out 3 experiments on the sampling of sugar cane for technological determinations, one with each of the varieties Co 419, CB 40-69 and CB 41-58, in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brasil. The main intent of the project was to compare 2 methods of sampling, namely: 1) Method A, where the sample is a hill (CATANI et al, 1959) or, more generally, 20 stalks all together in a randomly selected point of the furrow; 2) Method B, where 20 stalks are taken, from 20 points evenly spread but on the whole plot. Coefficients of variation for 20 stalk samples Variety Characteristic 20 stalks per hill 1 stalk per hill Brix 4.8% 1.9% Pol 6.4% 2.5% CB 40-69 Coefficient of purity 2.1% 0.83% Available sucrose 7.3% 2.7% Weight 6.6% 6.9% Brix 5.3% 1.8% Pol 7.6% 2.6% Co 419 Coefficient of purity 2.9% 1.0% Available sucrose 8.6% 3.0% Weight 21.2% 6.5% Brix 2.8% 1.4% Pol 4.1% 1.9% CB 41-58 Coefficient of purity 1.8% 0.8% Available sucrose 5.0% 2.2% Weight 10.9% 6.2% For the 3 varieties studied and for the data on Brix, pol, coefficient of purity, available sucrose and weight, analyses of variance were carried out. Further computations led to the following coefficients of variation. For available sucrose, which is probably the most important characteristic studied, the average coefficient of variation for the 3 varieties was 2.7%, for the case of method B, that is, 20 stalk samples, one stalk per hill. Assuming this coefficient of variation, in a trial with 5 treatments and 6 replications, in randomised blocks, the least significant difference among treatment means, at the 5% level, would be 4.7% of available sucrose by Tukey's test, and 3.3% by the t test. For the case of method A the average coefficient of variation is 7.0% and, in similar conditions, the least significant difference would be 15.1% by Tukey's test, and 12.1% by the t test. Since differences of available sucrose among treatments in experiments with fertilizers seldom are higher than 3 or 4% of the mean (PIMENTEL GOMES & CARDOSO, 1958), method B with a 20 stalk sample per plot gives more or less the minimum amount of cane to be sampled for technological determinations. In experiments with varieties, however, where differences may be assumed to be higher, a sample of 10 to 20 stalks one per hill, can be enough.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz1963-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/4325210.1590/S0071-12761963000100007Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz; v. 20 (1963); 89-1142316-89350071-1276reponame:Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queirozinstname:Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ-USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/43252/46877Gomes, F. PimentelValsechi, O.Abreu, Clovis P. deOliveira, Enio Roque deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-09-18T13:36:39Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/43252Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/about/contactPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/oaiscientia@esalq.usp.br0071-12760071-1276opendoar:2012-09-18T13:36:39Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ-USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
title |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
spellingShingle |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas Gomes, F. Pimentel |
title_short |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
title_full |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
title_fullStr |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
title_full_unstemmed |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
title_sort |
A amostragem da cana-de-açúcar para determinações tecnológicas |
author |
Gomes, F. Pimentel |
author_facet |
Gomes, F. Pimentel Valsechi, O. Abreu, Clovis P. de Oliveira, Enio Roque de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valsechi, O. Abreu, Clovis P. de Oliveira, Enio Roque de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, F. Pimentel Valsechi, O. Abreu, Clovis P. de Oliveira, Enio Roque de |
description |
The authors carried out 3 experiments on the sampling of sugar cane for technological determinations, one with each of the varieties Co 419, CB 40-69 and CB 41-58, in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brasil. The main intent of the project was to compare 2 methods of sampling, namely: 1) Method A, where the sample is a hill (CATANI et al, 1959) or, more generally, 20 stalks all together in a randomly selected point of the furrow; 2) Method B, where 20 stalks are taken, from 20 points evenly spread but on the whole plot. Coefficients of variation for 20 stalk samples Variety Characteristic 20 stalks per hill 1 stalk per hill Brix 4.8% 1.9% Pol 6.4% 2.5% CB 40-69 Coefficient of purity 2.1% 0.83% Available sucrose 7.3% 2.7% Weight 6.6% 6.9% Brix 5.3% 1.8% Pol 7.6% 2.6% Co 419 Coefficient of purity 2.9% 1.0% Available sucrose 8.6% 3.0% Weight 21.2% 6.5% Brix 2.8% 1.4% Pol 4.1% 1.9% CB 41-58 Coefficient of purity 1.8% 0.8% Available sucrose 5.0% 2.2% Weight 10.9% 6.2% For the 3 varieties studied and for the data on Brix, pol, coefficient of purity, available sucrose and weight, analyses of variance were carried out. Further computations led to the following coefficients of variation. For available sucrose, which is probably the most important characteristic studied, the average coefficient of variation for the 3 varieties was 2.7%, for the case of method B, that is, 20 stalk samples, one stalk per hill. Assuming this coefficient of variation, in a trial with 5 treatments and 6 replications, in randomised blocks, the least significant difference among treatment means, at the 5% level, would be 4.7% of available sucrose by Tukey's test, and 3.3% by the t test. For the case of method A the average coefficient of variation is 7.0% and, in similar conditions, the least significant difference would be 15.1% by Tukey's test, and 12.1% by the t test. Since differences of available sucrose among treatments in experiments with fertilizers seldom are higher than 3 or 4% of the mean (PIMENTEL GOMES & CARDOSO, 1958), method B with a 20 stalk sample per plot gives more or less the minimum amount of cane to be sampled for technological determinations. In experiments with varieties, however, where differences may be assumed to be higher, a sample of 10 to 20 stalks one per hill, can be enough. |
publishDate |
1963 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1963-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/43252 10.1590/S0071-12761963000100007 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/43252 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0071-12761963000100007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/aesalq/article/view/43252/46877 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz; v. 20 (1963); 89-114 2316-8935 0071-1276 reponame:Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz instname:Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ-USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ-USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
collection |
Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ-USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@esalq.usp.br |
_version_ |
1797050008182194176 |