Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Binelli, Mario
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza, Celeguini, Eneiva Carla Carvalho, Almeida, Alexandre Barreto de, Rossa, Luis Augusto Ferreira, Baruselli, Pietro Sampaio, Madureira, Ed Hoffmann
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26417
Resumo: Objectives of the present experiment were to evaluate the reproductive performance and estrus characteristics in cross-bred beef heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) treated with a MGA/prostaglandin (PG) protocol in association with other hormones. On day 0 (Day 0 = beginning of MGA intake), heifers were randomly allocated to receive 2mL saline solution (Saline group), 2500IU hCG (hCG group), 20µg buserelin acetate (GnRH group) or 5mg 17²-estradiol + 100mg progesterone (E2-17²+P4 group). Blood samples were obtained at days - 7, 0, 7 and 10 to evaluate progesterone plasma concentrations. Heifers from all groups received 0,5mg MGA/animal/day from days 0 to 7 and PG (Day 7). Heifers were observed for heat for 120h using the "Heat-Watch" system, starting immediately after the PG injection. Heifers were inseminated 12 hours after observed heat or timed inseminated 72 hours after PG injection. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 35 days after insemination by transrectal ultrasonography. Estrus response in each group was 50,0%, 22,2%, 59,5% and 71,8% for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups respectively (P<0,01). Average interval from PG to estrus was 72,8 ± 22,2, 102,0 ± 22,7, 84,6 ± 19,0 and 72,5 ± 24,4 hours (P<0,01) and the degree of synchronization was similar among groups. Conception rates were 57,9%, 37,5%, 40,9% and 39,3%, and pregnancy rates were 29,0%, 11,1%, 27,0% and 28,2% respectively, for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups. There was no treatment effect on estrus duration (10,4 ± 5,7 hours), number of mounts (23,0 ± 16,9), and duration of mounts (2,7 ± 0,3 seconds). Values in parenthesis represent pooled mean ± standard error for each variable. In conclusion, reproductive performance was not altered by adding hCG, GnRH or E2-17²+P4 to the MGA/PG synchronization protocol.
id USP-49_c6d96ce6dcccce0b700f2cfef9239557
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/26417
network_acronym_str USP-49
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository_id_str https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index
spelling Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)Uso do hCG, GnRH ou 17²-Estradiol e progesterona associados ao acetato de melengestrol e prostaglandina f2± em novilhas cruzadas (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)EstrusSynchronizationTelemetryMelengestrol acetateProstaglandinsEstro animalSincronizaçãoTelemetriaAcetato de melengestrolProstaglandinasObjectives of the present experiment were to evaluate the reproductive performance and estrus characteristics in cross-bred beef heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) treated with a MGA/prostaglandin (PG) protocol in association with other hormones. On day 0 (Day 0 = beginning of MGA intake), heifers were randomly allocated to receive 2mL saline solution (Saline group), 2500IU hCG (hCG group), 20µg buserelin acetate (GnRH group) or 5mg 17²-estradiol + 100mg progesterone (E2-17²+P4 group). Blood samples were obtained at days - 7, 0, 7 and 10 to evaluate progesterone plasma concentrations. Heifers from all groups received 0,5mg MGA/animal/day from days 0 to 7 and PG (Day 7). Heifers were observed for heat for 120h using the "Heat-Watch" system, starting immediately after the PG injection. Heifers were inseminated 12 hours after observed heat or timed inseminated 72 hours after PG injection. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 35 days after insemination by transrectal ultrasonography. Estrus response in each group was 50,0%, 22,2%, 59,5% and 71,8% for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups respectively (P<0,01). Average interval from PG to estrus was 72,8 ± 22,2, 102,0 ± 22,7, 84,6 ± 19,0 and 72,5 ± 24,4 hours (P<0,01) and the degree of synchronization was similar among groups. Conception rates were 57,9%, 37,5%, 40,9% and 39,3%, and pregnancy rates were 29,0%, 11,1%, 27,0% and 28,2% respectively, for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups. There was no treatment effect on estrus duration (10,4 ± 5,7 hours), number of mounts (23,0 ± 16,9), and duration of mounts (2,7 ± 0,3 seconds). Values in parenthesis represent pooled mean ± standard error for each variable. In conclusion, reproductive performance was not altered by adding hCG, GnRH or E2-17²+P4 to the MGA/PG synchronization protocol.O objetivo do presente experimento foi avaliar a performance reprodutiva e as características de estros em novilhas cruzadas de corte (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) tratadas com o protocolo MGA/Prostaglandina (PG) em associação a outros hormônios. No dia 0 (Dia 0 = início da ingestão do MGA) as novilhas foram distribuídas ao acaso para receber 2mL de solução salina (grupo Salina), 2500UI de hCG (grupo hCG), 20µg de acetato de buserelina (grupo GnRH) ou 5mg de 17²-estradiol + 100mg de progesterona (grupo 17²-E2+P4). Amostras de sangue foram colhidas nos dias - 7, 0, 7 e 10 para a mensuração das concentrações plasmáticas de progesterona. Independentemente do tratamento, todas as novilhas receberam 0,5mg MGA/animal/dia durante 8 dias (Dia 0 ao 7) e PG (Dia 7). Os estros foram observados durante 120h, a partir da injeção de PG, pelo sistema "Heat-Watch". As novilhas foram inseminadas 12 horas após o início dos estros ou 72h depois da injeção de PG. O diagnóstico de gestação foi realizado 35 dias após a última inseminação, por ultra-sonografia. As respostas em estros foram de 50,0%, 22,2%, 59,5% e 71,8% para os grupos Salina, hCG, GnRH e 17²-E2+P4, respectivamente (P<0,01). O intervalo médio da injeção de PG ao estro foi de 72,8 ± 22,2, 102,0 ± 22,7, 84,6 ± 19,0 e 72,5 ± 24,4 horas (P<0,01), sendo o grau de sincronização similar entre os grupos. As taxas de concepção foram de 57,9%, 37,5%, 40,9% e 39,3% e as taxas de prenhez de 29,0%, 11,1%, 27,0% e 28,2%, para os grupos Salina, hCG, GnRH e 17²-E2+P4, respectivamente. Não houve efeito do tratamento na duração dos estros (10,4 ± 5,7 horas), número de montas (23,0 ± 16,9) e duração das montas (2,7 ± 0,3 segundos), sendo os valores entre parênteses correspondentes às médias gerais e desvios padrão. Em conclusão, a performance reprodutiva não foi alterada pela adição do hCG, GnRH ou 17²-E2+P4 ao protocolo de sincronização MGA/PG.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia2005-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/2641710.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2005.26417Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2005); 237-249Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2005); 237-249Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 42 n. 4 (2005); 237-249Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 42 N. 4 (2005); 237-2491678-44561413-9596reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinstname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26417/28200Binelli, MarioRodrigues, Paulo Henrique MazzaCeleguini, Eneiva Carla CarvalhoAlmeida, Alexandre Barreto deRossa, Luis Augusto FerreiraBaruselli, Pietro SampaioMadureira, Ed Hoffmanninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-23T04:19:53Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/26417Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvrasPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/oaibjvras@usp.br1413-95961413-9596opendoar:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index2023-01-12T16:42:42.628883Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
Uso do hCG, GnRH ou 17²-Estradiol e progesterona associados ao acetato de melengestrol e prostaglandina f2± em novilhas cruzadas (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
title Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
spellingShingle Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
Binelli, Mario
Estrus
Synchronization
Telemetry
Melengestrol acetate
Prostaglandins
Estro animal
Sincronização
Telemetria
Acetato de melengestrol
Prostaglandinas
title_short Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
title_full Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
title_fullStr Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
title_full_unstemmed Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
title_sort Use of hCG, GnRH or 17²-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2± in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)
author Binelli, Mario
author_facet Binelli, Mario
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Celeguini, Eneiva Carla Carvalho
Almeida, Alexandre Barreto de
Rossa, Luis Augusto Ferreira
Baruselli, Pietro Sampaio
Madureira, Ed Hoffmann
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Celeguini, Eneiva Carla Carvalho
Almeida, Alexandre Barreto de
Rossa, Luis Augusto Ferreira
Baruselli, Pietro Sampaio
Madureira, Ed Hoffmann
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Binelli, Mario
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Celeguini, Eneiva Carla Carvalho
Almeida, Alexandre Barreto de
Rossa, Luis Augusto Ferreira
Baruselli, Pietro Sampaio
Madureira, Ed Hoffmann
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estrus
Synchronization
Telemetry
Melengestrol acetate
Prostaglandins
Estro animal
Sincronização
Telemetria
Acetato de melengestrol
Prostaglandinas
topic Estrus
Synchronization
Telemetry
Melengestrol acetate
Prostaglandins
Estro animal
Sincronização
Telemetria
Acetato de melengestrol
Prostaglandinas
description Objectives of the present experiment were to evaluate the reproductive performance and estrus characteristics in cross-bred beef heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) treated with a MGA/prostaglandin (PG) protocol in association with other hormones. On day 0 (Day 0 = beginning of MGA intake), heifers were randomly allocated to receive 2mL saline solution (Saline group), 2500IU hCG (hCG group), 20µg buserelin acetate (GnRH group) or 5mg 17²-estradiol + 100mg progesterone (E2-17²+P4 group). Blood samples were obtained at days - 7, 0, 7 and 10 to evaluate progesterone plasma concentrations. Heifers from all groups received 0,5mg MGA/animal/day from days 0 to 7 and PG (Day 7). Heifers were observed for heat for 120h using the "Heat-Watch" system, starting immediately after the PG injection. Heifers were inseminated 12 hours after observed heat or timed inseminated 72 hours after PG injection. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 35 days after insemination by transrectal ultrasonography. Estrus response in each group was 50,0%, 22,2%, 59,5% and 71,8% for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups respectively (P<0,01). Average interval from PG to estrus was 72,8 ± 22,2, 102,0 ± 22,7, 84,6 ± 19,0 and 72,5 ± 24,4 hours (P<0,01) and the degree of synchronization was similar among groups. Conception rates were 57,9%, 37,5%, 40,9% and 39,3%, and pregnancy rates were 29,0%, 11,1%, 27,0% and 28,2% respectively, for Saline, hCG, GnRH and E2-17²+P4 groups. There was no treatment effect on estrus duration (10,4 ± 5,7 hours), number of mounts (23,0 ± 16,9), and duration of mounts (2,7 ± 0,3 seconds). Values in parenthesis represent pooled mean ± standard error for each variable. In conclusion, reproductive performance was not altered by adding hCG, GnRH or E2-17²+P4 to the MGA/PG synchronization protocol.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26417
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2005.26417
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26417
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2005.26417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26417/28200
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2005); 237-249
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2005); 237-249
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 42 n. 4 (2005); 237-249
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 42 N. 4 (2005); 237-249
1678-4456
1413-9596
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
instname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjvras@usp.br
_version_ 1797051557241421824