Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial

• Autor(a) principal: Araujo,Sergio Eduardo Alonso
• Data de Publicação: 2003
• Outros Autores: Sousa Jr,Afonso Henrique da Silva e, Campos,Fábio Guilherme Caserta Marysael de, Habr-Gama,Angelita, Dumarco,Rodrigo Blanco, Caravatto,Pedro Paulo de Paris, Nahas,Sergio Carlos, Silva,José Hyppólito da, Kiss,Desidério Roberto, Gama-Rodrigues,Joaquim José
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812003000300002
• topic: Rectal cancer; Rectum; Laparoscopic resection; Abdominoperineal amputation

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection compared to conventional approach for surgical treatment of patients with distal rectal cancer presenting with incomplete response after chemoradiation. METHOD: Twenty eight patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to undergo surgical treatment by laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or conventional approach and evaluated prospectively. Thirteen underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and 15 conventional approach. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p<0,05) between the two studied groups regarding: gender, age, body mass index, patients with previous abdominal surgeries, intra and post operative complications, need for blood transfusion, hospital stay after surgery, length of resected segment and pathological staging. Mean operation time was 228 minutes for the laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection versus 284 minutes for the conventional approach (p=0.04). Mean anesthesia duration was shorter (p=0.03) for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection when compared to conventional approach : 304 and 362 minutes, respectively. There was no need for conversion to open approach in this series. After a mean follow-up of 47.2 months and with the exclusion of two patients in the conventional abdominoperineal resection who presented with unsuspected synchronic metastasis during surgery, local recurrence was observed in two patients in the conventional group and in none in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection is feasible, similar to conventional approach concerning surgery duration, intra operative morbidity, blood requirements and post operative morbidity. Larger number of cases and an extended follow-up are required to adequate evaluation of oncological results for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection after chemoradiation for radical treatment of distal rectal cancer.