Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812000000200004 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: Debates about the quality of medical education have become more evident in the recent past, and as a result several different assessment methods have been refined for that purpose. The use of questionnaires filled out by medical students to assess the quality of lectures is one of the most common methods employed in our milieu. However, the reliability of this investigation method has not yet been systematically tested. The authors present the reliability of a specific form applied to the fourth grade medical students during the clinical psychiatry course. METHOD: Eighty-one fourth grade medical students were instructed to complete a form immediately after each clinical psychiatry lecture. Thirty-four students (42%) failed to turn in the forms after the final lecture. These students were given an identical form to assess the lectures in a retrospective fashion. The grades given by both groups of students for each performed lecture and the number of students who have graded an unperformed lecture were compared. Statistical significance for both groups was determined by means of the chi-square test (p< 0.05). RESULTS: Eighteen out of the 34 students who filled out the forms retrospectively (53%) rated the unperformed lecture, whereas only 5 out of the 47 students who filled out the forms during the course (11%) did so. This is statistically significant (p< 0.05). There was no statistical difference for the grades given to the lectures that were actually performed. DISCUSSION: The authors concluded the low reliability rate of the retrospective evaluation warrant a continuous assessment method during the course. |
id |
USP-57_836c9e294a347ecbaf5d3194f0af93d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0041-87812000000200004 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-57 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable?Medical educationStudentsAssessmentQualityReliabilityINTRODUCTION: Debates about the quality of medical education have become more evident in the recent past, and as a result several different assessment methods have been refined for that purpose. The use of questionnaires filled out by medical students to assess the quality of lectures is one of the most common methods employed in our milieu. However, the reliability of this investigation method has not yet been systematically tested. The authors present the reliability of a specific form applied to the fourth grade medical students during the clinical psychiatry course. METHOD: Eighty-one fourth grade medical students were instructed to complete a form immediately after each clinical psychiatry lecture. Thirty-four students (42%) failed to turn in the forms after the final lecture. These students were given an identical form to assess the lectures in a retrospective fashion. The grades given by both groups of students for each performed lecture and the number of students who have graded an unperformed lecture were compared. Statistical significance for both groups was determined by means of the chi-square test (p< 0.05). RESULTS: Eighteen out of the 34 students who filled out the forms retrospectively (53%) rated the unperformed lecture, whereas only 5 out of the 47 students who filled out the forms during the course (11%) did so. This is statistically significant (p< 0.05). There was no statistical difference for the grades given to the lectures that were actually performed. DISCUSSION: The authors concluded the low reliability rate of the retrospective evaluation warrant a continuous assessment method during the course.Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP2000-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812000000200004Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.55 n.2 2000reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicasinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0041-87812000000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeluso,Marco Aurélio MonteiroTavares,HermanoD'Elia,Gilbertoeng2000-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0041-87812000000200004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rhcPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br1678-99030041-8781opendoar:2000-08-24T00:00Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
title |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? Peluso,Marco Aurélio Monteiro Medical education Students Assessment Quality Reliability |
title_short |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
title_full |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
title_sort |
Assessment of medical courses in Brazil using student-completed questionnaires. Is it reliable? |
author |
Peluso,Marco Aurélio Monteiro |
author_facet |
Peluso,Marco Aurélio Monteiro Tavares,Hermano D'Elia,Gilberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tavares,Hermano D'Elia,Gilberto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peluso,Marco Aurélio Monteiro Tavares,Hermano D'Elia,Gilberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medical education Students Assessment Quality Reliability |
topic |
Medical education Students Assessment Quality Reliability |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Debates about the quality of medical education have become more evident in the recent past, and as a result several different assessment methods have been refined for that purpose. The use of questionnaires filled out by medical students to assess the quality of lectures is one of the most common methods employed in our milieu. However, the reliability of this investigation method has not yet been systematically tested. The authors present the reliability of a specific form applied to the fourth grade medical students during the clinical psychiatry course. METHOD: Eighty-one fourth grade medical students were instructed to complete a form immediately after each clinical psychiatry lecture. Thirty-four students (42%) failed to turn in the forms after the final lecture. These students were given an identical form to assess the lectures in a retrospective fashion. The grades given by both groups of students for each performed lecture and the number of students who have graded an unperformed lecture were compared. Statistical significance for both groups was determined by means of the chi-square test (p< 0.05). RESULTS: Eighteen out of the 34 students who filled out the forms retrospectively (53%) rated the unperformed lecture, whereas only 5 out of the 47 students who filled out the forms during the course (11%) did so. This is statistically significant (p< 0.05). There was no statistical difference for the grades given to the lectures that were actually performed. DISCUSSION: The authors concluded the low reliability rate of the retrospective evaluation warrant a continuous assessment method during the course. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812000000200004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812000000200004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0041-87812000000200004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.55 n.2 2000 reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicas instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
collection |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754820894028464128 |