Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Archives of Clinical Psychiatry |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/144868 |
Resumo: | Background In Portugal, as far as we know, there are no recent studies that evaluated the comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities in addiction problems by reference to a holistic and psychosocial model of effectiveness. Objectives Using a sample of Portuguese patients in outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse, this study aimed to examine if a combined treatment modality (group therapy with individual intervention) had greater overall efficacy when compared to other three types of treatment without group therapy. Methods This is a correlational and cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients (N = 254) from an outpatient treatment in the Intervention Service on Addictive Behaviors and Substance Dependence. At the time of data collection, the patients were attending four types of treatment, such as receiving intervention based on individual psychological counseling (n = 66); receiving individual psychiatric counseling (n = 68); receiving both individual psychological and psychiatric counseling (n = 102); and receiving not only individual counseling (i.e., psychology or psychiatry), but also attending group therapy (n = 18). Results Using MANOVA and Wilks’s multivariate test criterion, there was a significant effect of treatment modality on the global efficacy, Λ = 0.88, F(9, 603) = 3.75, p < 0.0001. Examination of mean estimates indicated that patients in a combined therapeutic modality revealed more treatment involvement compared to patients in other therapeutic modalities without group therapy. Discussion The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of integrating interventions in a collaborative way. A combined therapeutic modality, adding group therapy, was associated with positive effects, such as more levels of peer support and involvement in treatment, and increasing the individual’s probability to remain abstinent. |
id |
USP-5_cee3bab7ace63885b2a4c5ce46b4af7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/144868 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-5 |
network_name_str |
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatmentAddictionoutpatient treatmentsgroup therapytreatment effectiveness evaluation Background In Portugal, as far as we know, there are no recent studies that evaluated the comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities in addiction problems by reference to a holistic and psychosocial model of effectiveness. Objectives Using a sample of Portuguese patients in outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse, this study aimed to examine if a combined treatment modality (group therapy with individual intervention) had greater overall efficacy when compared to other three types of treatment without group therapy. Methods This is a correlational and cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients (N = 254) from an outpatient treatment in the Intervention Service on Addictive Behaviors and Substance Dependence. At the time of data collection, the patients were attending four types of treatment, such as receiving intervention based on individual psychological counseling (n = 66); receiving individual psychiatric counseling (n = 68); receiving both individual psychological and psychiatric counseling (n = 102); and receiving not only individual counseling (i.e., psychology or psychiatry), but also attending group therapy (n = 18). Results Using MANOVA and Wilks’s multivariate test criterion, there was a significant effect of treatment modality on the global efficacy, Λ = 0.88, F(9, 603) = 3.75, p < 0.0001. Examination of mean estimates indicated that patients in a combined therapeutic modality revealed more treatment involvement compared to patients in other therapeutic modalities without group therapy. Discussion The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of integrating interventions in a collaborative way. A combined therapeutic modality, adding group therapy, was associated with positive effects, such as more levels of peer support and involvement in treatment, and increasing the individual’s probability to remain abstinent.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Instituto de Psiquiatria2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/14486810.1590/0101-60830000000134Archives of Clinical Psychiatry; v. 44 n. 5 (2017); 117-121Archives of Clinical Psychiatry; Vol. 44 No. 5 (2017); 117-121Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica; Vol. 44 Núm. 5 (2017); 117-1211806-938X0101-6083reponame:Archives of Clinical Psychiatryinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/144868/139095Copyright (c) 2018 Archives of Clinical Psychiatryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMOURA, ANDREIA DEPINTO, RICARDOFERROS, LÍGIAJONGENELEN, INÊSNEGREIROS, JORGE2018-03-29T16:26:01Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/144868Revistahttp://www.hcnet.usp.br/ipq/revista/index.htmlPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||archives@usp.br1806-938X0101-6083opendoar:2018-03-29T16:26:01Archives of Clinical Psychiatry - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
title |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment MOURA, ANDREIA DE Addiction outpatient treatments group therapy treatment effectiveness evaluation |
title_short |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
title_full |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
title_sort |
Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment |
author |
MOURA, ANDREIA DE |
author_facet |
MOURA, ANDREIA DE PINTO, RICARDO FERROS, LÍGIA JONGENELEN, INÊS NEGREIROS, JORGE |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PINTO, RICARDO FERROS, LÍGIA JONGENELEN, INÊS NEGREIROS, JORGE |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MOURA, ANDREIA DE PINTO, RICARDO FERROS, LÍGIA JONGENELEN, INÊS NEGREIROS, JORGE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Addiction outpatient treatments group therapy treatment effectiveness evaluation |
topic |
Addiction outpatient treatments group therapy treatment effectiveness evaluation |
description |
Background In Portugal, as far as we know, there are no recent studies that evaluated the comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities in addiction problems by reference to a holistic and psychosocial model of effectiveness. Objectives Using a sample of Portuguese patients in outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse, this study aimed to examine if a combined treatment modality (group therapy with individual intervention) had greater overall efficacy when compared to other three types of treatment without group therapy. Methods This is a correlational and cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients (N = 254) from an outpatient treatment in the Intervention Service on Addictive Behaviors and Substance Dependence. At the time of data collection, the patients were attending four types of treatment, such as receiving intervention based on individual psychological counseling (n = 66); receiving individual psychiatric counseling (n = 68); receiving both individual psychological and psychiatric counseling (n = 102); and receiving not only individual counseling (i.e., psychology or psychiatry), but also attending group therapy (n = 18). Results Using MANOVA and Wilks’s multivariate test criterion, there was a significant effect of treatment modality on the global efficacy, Λ = 0.88, F(9, 603) = 3.75, p < 0.0001. Examination of mean estimates indicated that patients in a combined therapeutic modality revealed more treatment involvement compared to patients in other therapeutic modalities without group therapy. Discussion The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of integrating interventions in a collaborative way. A combined therapeutic modality, adding group therapy, was associated with positive effects, such as more levels of peer support and involvement in treatment, and increasing the individual’s probability to remain abstinent. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/144868 10.1590/0101-60830000000134 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/144868 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-60830000000134 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/acp/article/view/144868/139095 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Archives of Clinical Psychiatry info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Archives of Clinical Psychiatry |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Instituto de Psiquiatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Instituto de Psiquiatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry; v. 44 n. 5 (2017); 117-121 Archives of Clinical Psychiatry; Vol. 44 No. 5 (2017); 117-121 Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica; Vol. 44 Núm. 5 (2017); 117-121 1806-938X 0101-6083 reponame:Archives of Clinical Psychiatry instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry |
collection |
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archives@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800237623837458432 |