Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Charles Morphy D.
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Amorim, Dalton S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/33707
Resumo: A growing number of biogeographical methods have attempted to describe formal means of reconstructing the biogeographical history of the organisms. Whatever the biogeographical method, however, the source of systematic information has to be well worked out. Taxonomic noise is sometimes a true impediment to properly deal with the complexity of life in its three-dimensional aspects, the threefold parallelism represented by form, space and time. This paper argues that historical systematics is a necessary basis for a historical biogeography. Organismal phylogenies or at least hypotheses of monophyly should be taken as the basis for the study of distribution patterns. Whenever a non-monophyletic taxon is misleadingly taken as monophyletic, erroneous interpretations in evolutionary analyses necessarily follow. When the proportion of paraphyletic taxa considered in an analysis is small, a general pattern may be obtained, but the interpretation of the biogeographical evolution of each paraphyletic taxon will be equivocated. The delimitation of areas of endemism also depends on the precision of the recovered phylogenetic information. Indices based on phylogenetic diversity allow the delimitation of areas for conservation of biological diversity. Despite the plethora of current available biogeographical methods, biogeography is not a mess, as was pointed elsewhere. The order in the discipline is subtle: as biogeography intends to comprehend the living world based on the study of the form, space and time, a phylogenetic framework is a basic requirement. The lack of reliable biogeographical primary information - historical taxa - certainly creates severe obstacles for historical biogeography.
id USP-69_1f0b39aed90898f04d5e0e93b340aa5c
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/33707
network_acronym_str USP-69
network_name_str Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation BiogeographycladisticsconservationendemismmonophylyphylogenyspeciesBiogeografiacladísticaconservaçãoendemismoespéciesfilogeniamonofiletismo A growing number of biogeographical methods have attempted to describe formal means of reconstructing the biogeographical history of the organisms. Whatever the biogeographical method, however, the source of systematic information has to be well worked out. Taxonomic noise is sometimes a true impediment to properly deal with the complexity of life in its three-dimensional aspects, the threefold parallelism represented by form, space and time. This paper argues that historical systematics is a necessary basis for a historical biogeography. Organismal phylogenies or at least hypotheses of monophyly should be taken as the basis for the study of distribution patterns. Whenever a non-monophyletic taxon is misleadingly taken as monophyletic, erroneous interpretations in evolutionary analyses necessarily follow. When the proportion of paraphyletic taxa considered in an analysis is small, a general pattern may be obtained, but the interpretation of the biogeographical evolution of each paraphyletic taxon will be equivocated. The delimitation of areas of endemism also depends on the precision of the recovered phylogenetic information. Indices based on phylogenetic diversity allow the delimitation of areas for conservation of biological diversity. Despite the plethora of current available biogeographical methods, biogeography is not a mess, as was pointed elsewhere. The order in the discipline is subtle: as biogeography intends to comprehend the living world based on the study of the form, space and time, a phylogenetic framework is a basic requirement. The lack of reliable biogeographical primary information - historical taxa - certainly creates severe obstacles for historical biogeography. Um crescente número de métodos biogeográficos tem buscado descrever maneiras formais de reconstruir a história biogeográfica dos organismos. Entretanto, para qualquer método biogeográfico empregado, a fonte de informação sistemática deve ser precisa. Ruído taxonômico é por vezes um verdadeiro obstáculo para se tratar apropriadamente da complexidade da vida no seu aspecto tridimensional, representado pelo triplo paralelismo forma, espaço e tempo. Esse artigo defende que a sistemática é o fundamento necessário para a biogeografia histórica. Filogenias de organismos ou ao menos hipóteses de monofiletismo devem ser a base para o estudo de padrões de distribuição. Táxons não-monofiléticos tomados erroneamente como monofiléticos resultarão em interpretações incorretas nas análises evolutivas. Quando a proporção de táxons parafiléticos considerada em uma análise é pequena, um padrão geral pode ser obtido, mas a interpretação da evolução biogeográfica de cada táxon parafilético será equivocada. A delimitação de áreas de endemismo, da mesma forma, também depende da precisão da informação filogenética. Além disso, índices baseados na diversidade filogenética permitem a delimitação de áreas para a conservação da diversidade biológica. Apesar da pletora de métodos biogeográficos correntes, a biogeografia não é uma confusão, como foi apontado anteriormente. A ordem nessa disciplina é sutil: como a biogeografia pretende compreender o mundo natural baseandose no estudo de forma, tempo e espaço, um arcabouço filogenético é condição essencial. A ausência de informação biogeográfica primária confiável - táxons históricos - cria sérios obstáculos para a biogeografia histórica. Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/3370710.1590/S0031-10492007000400001Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 47 n. 4 (2007); 63-73 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 47 Núm. 4 (2007); 63-73 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 47 No. 4 (2007); 63-73 1807-02050031-1049reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/33707/36445Santos, Charles Morphy D.Amorim, Dalton S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-07-15T19:36:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/33707Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pazPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/oaipublicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br1807-02050031-1049opendoar:2023-01-12T16:41:31.754194Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
title Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
spellingShingle Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
Santos, Charles Morphy D.
Biogeography
cladistics
conservation
endemism
monophyly
phylogeny
species
Biogeografia
cladística
conservação
endemismo
espécies
filogenia
monofiletismo
title_short Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
title_full Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
title_fullStr Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
title_sort Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation
author Santos, Charles Morphy D.
author_facet Santos, Charles Morphy D.
Amorim, Dalton S.
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Dalton S.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Charles Morphy D.
Amorim, Dalton S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biogeography
cladistics
conservation
endemism
monophyly
phylogeny
species
Biogeografia
cladística
conservação
endemismo
espécies
filogenia
monofiletismo
topic Biogeography
cladistics
conservation
endemism
monophyly
phylogeny
species
Biogeografia
cladística
conservação
endemismo
espécies
filogenia
monofiletismo
description A growing number of biogeographical methods have attempted to describe formal means of reconstructing the biogeographical history of the organisms. Whatever the biogeographical method, however, the source of systematic information has to be well worked out. Taxonomic noise is sometimes a true impediment to properly deal with the complexity of life in its three-dimensional aspects, the threefold parallelism represented by form, space and time. This paper argues that historical systematics is a necessary basis for a historical biogeography. Organismal phylogenies or at least hypotheses of monophyly should be taken as the basis for the study of distribution patterns. Whenever a non-monophyletic taxon is misleadingly taken as monophyletic, erroneous interpretations in evolutionary analyses necessarily follow. When the proportion of paraphyletic taxa considered in an analysis is small, a general pattern may be obtained, but the interpretation of the biogeographical evolution of each paraphyletic taxon will be equivocated. The delimitation of areas of endemism also depends on the precision of the recovered phylogenetic information. Indices based on phylogenetic diversity allow the delimitation of areas for conservation of biological diversity. Despite the plethora of current available biogeographical methods, biogeography is not a mess, as was pointed elsewhere. The order in the discipline is subtle: as biogeography intends to comprehend the living world based on the study of the form, space and time, a phylogenetic framework is a basic requirement. The lack of reliable biogeographical primary information - historical taxa - certainly creates severe obstacles for historical biogeography.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/33707
10.1590/S0031-10492007000400001
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/33707
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0031-10492007000400001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/33707/36445
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 47 n. 4 (2007); 63-73
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 47 Núm. 4 (2007); 63-73
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 47 No. 4 (2007); 63-73
1807-0205
0031-1049
reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
collection Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br
_version_ 1797051526364004352