Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Orlandin, Elton
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Piovesan, Mônica, D’Agostini, Fernanda Maurer, Carneiro, Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/155446
Resumo: Landscapes composed of small rural properties may support highly heterogeneous habitat, because they often support distinct types of land uses adjacent to surrounding forest fragments. Many butterfly species may benefit from this kind of landscape, as very distinct microhabitats can be found in a very restricted spatial scale. To better understand how different microhabitats are related to fragmentation in rural landscapes the present study collected the butterfly fauna in 18 sampling point sites, representing distinct types of forest edges and forest interiors. Although closely located, these sites showed no spatial autocorrelation. Instead, a major distinction in species richness and composition was found among forest interior and edge habitats while no significant difference was found in species composition among distinct edge habitats. Therefore, the high segregation of butterfly assemblages found in a very restricted geographic scale suggests the presence of two different groups of butterflies that respond independently to forest fragmentation, the forest interior assemblages and forest edge assemblages. This distinction of butterfly assemblages related to forest interior and forest edges were already reported, but our results highlights that these differences are found mostly due to species turnover between those habitats. In other words, both microhabitat types present a high number of specialized species compared to a smaller fraction of generalist species that may occurs in both microhabitats. Althoug, in the case of Atlantic Forest the species of special conservation concern are those true specialized in forest interior habitats and not those specialized in forest edges, the present study corroborates the importance of sampling different microhabitats when studying fragmentation processes, both inside and outside of fragments. Although forest edges may present different kinds of habitat types, species present along border tend to be as heterogeneous as species present in different locations inside the forest. This information should be considered in sampling designs of biodiversity essays that focus on a more consistent representation of local diversity.
id USP-69_42800106a96cb65f69bdb60e7a8408fb
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/155446
network_acronym_str USP-69
network_name_str Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscapeAtlantic RainforestLandscape fragmentationHost plantsSpecies listLandscapes composed of small rural properties may support highly heterogeneous habitat, because they often support distinct types of land uses adjacent to surrounding forest fragments. Many butterfly species may benefit from this kind of landscape, as very distinct microhabitats can be found in a very restricted spatial scale. To better understand how different microhabitats are related to fragmentation in rural landscapes the present study collected the butterfly fauna in 18 sampling point sites, representing distinct types of forest edges and forest interiors. Although closely located, these sites showed no spatial autocorrelation. Instead, a major distinction in species richness and composition was found among forest interior and edge habitats while no significant difference was found in species composition among distinct edge habitats. Therefore, the high segregation of butterfly assemblages found in a very restricted geographic scale suggests the presence of two different groups of butterflies that respond independently to forest fragmentation, the forest interior assemblages and forest edge assemblages. This distinction of butterfly assemblages related to forest interior and forest edges were already reported, but our results highlights that these differences are found mostly due to species turnover between those habitats. In other words, both microhabitat types present a high number of specialized species compared to a smaller fraction of generalist species that may occurs in both microhabitats. Althoug, in the case of Atlantic Forest the species of special conservation concern are those true specialized in forest interior habitats and not those specialized in forest edges, the present study corroborates the importance of sampling different microhabitats when studying fragmentation processes, both inside and outside of fragments. Although forest edges may present different kinds of habitat types, species present along border tend to be as heterogeneous as species present in different locations inside the forest. This information should be considered in sampling designs of biodiversity essays that focus on a more consistent representation of local diversity.Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).2019-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/15544610.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.49Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 59 (2019); e20195949Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 59 (2019); e20195949Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 59 (2019); e201959491807-02050031-1049reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/155446/156981Copyright (c) 2019 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrlandin, EltonPiovesan, MônicaD’Agostini, Fernanda MaurerCarneiro, Eduardo2019-10-19T23:48:03Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/155446Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pazPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/oaipublicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br1807-02050031-1049opendoar:2023-01-12T16:41:56.182757Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
title Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
spellingShingle Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
Orlandin, Elton
Atlantic Rainforest
Landscape fragmentation
Host plants
Species list
title_short Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
title_full Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
title_fullStr Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
title_full_unstemmed Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
title_sort Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape
author Orlandin, Elton
author_facet Orlandin, Elton
Piovesan, Mônica
D’Agostini, Fernanda Maurer
Carneiro, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Piovesan, Mônica
D’Agostini, Fernanda Maurer
Carneiro, Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Orlandin, Elton
Piovesan, Mônica
D’Agostini, Fernanda Maurer
Carneiro, Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atlantic Rainforest
Landscape fragmentation
Host plants
Species list
topic Atlantic Rainforest
Landscape fragmentation
Host plants
Species list
description Landscapes composed of small rural properties may support highly heterogeneous habitat, because they often support distinct types of land uses adjacent to surrounding forest fragments. Many butterfly species may benefit from this kind of landscape, as very distinct microhabitats can be found in a very restricted spatial scale. To better understand how different microhabitats are related to fragmentation in rural landscapes the present study collected the butterfly fauna in 18 sampling point sites, representing distinct types of forest edges and forest interiors. Although closely located, these sites showed no spatial autocorrelation. Instead, a major distinction in species richness and composition was found among forest interior and edge habitats while no significant difference was found in species composition among distinct edge habitats. Therefore, the high segregation of butterfly assemblages found in a very restricted geographic scale suggests the presence of two different groups of butterflies that respond independently to forest fragmentation, the forest interior assemblages and forest edge assemblages. This distinction of butterfly assemblages related to forest interior and forest edges were already reported, but our results highlights that these differences are found mostly due to species turnover between those habitats. In other words, both microhabitat types present a high number of specialized species compared to a smaller fraction of generalist species that may occurs in both microhabitats. Althoug, in the case of Atlantic Forest the species of special conservation concern are those true specialized in forest interior habitats and not those specialized in forest edges, the present study corroborates the importance of sampling different microhabitats when studying fragmentation processes, both inside and outside of fragments. Although forest edges may present different kinds of habitat types, species present along border tend to be as heterogeneous as species present in different locations inside the forest. This information should be considered in sampling designs of biodiversity essays that focus on a more consistent representation of local diversity.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/155446
10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.49
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/155446
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.49
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/155446/156981
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 59 (2019); e20195949
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 59 (2019); e20195949
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 59 (2019); e20195949
1807-0205
0031-1049
reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
collection Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br
_version_ 1797051528620539904