Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Organicom (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138926 |
Resumo: | This paper develops a conceptual and theoretical analysis of risk communication in cases where experts and the public have widely divergent views of the dimensions of a risk. Applications are chosen from among the risk management problems that are inherent to handling of spent nuclear fuel. One stresses the fact that the conflicting points of views have very different bases. The role of trust is analyzed and, as it is a crucial issue, it becomes much more encompassing than what has usually been assumed. The reasons for this difference can be found in risk perception models applied to survey data concerning risk perception and related attitudes. |
id |
USP-72_01d54147f1c046f4555bd99fa2e03efe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/138926 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-72 |
network_name_str |
Organicom (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentionsRisk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentionsRisk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentionsPercepción de riesgo. Elección de lugar. Rechazo nuclear. Combustible nuclear usado.Percepção de risco. Escolha de local.• Rejeito nuclear. Combustível nuclear usado.Risk perception. Siting. Nuclear waste. Spent nuclear fuel.This paper develops a conceptual and theoretical analysis of risk communication in cases where experts and the public have widely divergent views of the dimensions of a risk. Applications are chosen from among the risk management problems that are inherent to handling of spent nuclear fuel. One stresses the fact that the conflicting points of views have very different bases. The role of trust is analyzed and, as it is a crucial issue, it becomes much more encompassing than what has usually been assumed. The reasons for this difference can be found in risk perception models applied to survey data concerning risk perception and related attitudes.Este estudo desenvolve uma análise conceitual e teórica de comunicação de risco em casos nos quais os especialistas e o público apresentam pontos de vista amplamente divergentes sobre o tamanho de um risco. As aplicações são escolhidas dentre os problemas de gerenciamento de risco inerentes ao manuseio de combustível nuclear usado. Enfatiza-se o fato de que pontos de vista conflitantes apresentam bases muito diferentes. O papel da confiança é analisado e, sendo um tema crucial, é muito mais abrangente do que geralmente se presume. As razões para esta diferença são encontradas em modelos de percepção de risco aplicados a dados de pesquisa sobre percepção de risco e atitudes a ela relacionadas. Se desarrolla un análisis conceptual y teórico de la comunicación de riesgo en casos en que los expertos y el público presentan puntos de vista significativamente divergentes sobre la dimensión de un riesgo. Se eligen las aplicaciones entre los problemas de gestión de riesgo inherentes al manoseo del combustible nuclear usado y se enfatiza el hecho de que los puntos de vista contrarios presentan bases muy diferentes. Se analiza el papel de la confianza y, aunque se trate de un tema crucial, es mucho más amplio de lo que generalmente se presume. Las razones para esta profunda diferencia se encuentran en modelos de percepción de riesgo aplicados a datos de investigación sobre percepción de riesgo y actitudes relacionadas con esta última.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes2007-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/13892610.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2007.138926Organicom; v. 4 n. 6 (2007): Comunicação de risco e crise: prevenção e gerenciamento; 66-852238-25931807-1236reponame:Organicom (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138926/134274Copyright (c) 2017 Organicominfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSjöberg, Lennart2017-10-27T11:44:22Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/138926Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/organicomPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/oairevistaorganicom@usp.br2238-25931807-1236opendoar:2023-01-13T10:35:19.372908Organicom (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
title |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
spellingShingle |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions Sjöberg, Lennart Percepción de riesgo. Elección de lugar. Rechazo nuclear. Combustible nuclear usado. Percepção de risco. Escolha de local.• Rejeito nuclear. Combustível nuclear usado. Risk perception. Siting. Nuclear waste. Spent nuclear fuel. |
title_short |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
title_full |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
title_fullStr |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
title_sort |
Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions |
author |
Sjöberg, Lennart |
author_facet |
Sjöberg, Lennart |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sjöberg, Lennart |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Percepción de riesgo. Elección de lugar. Rechazo nuclear. Combustible nuclear usado. Percepção de risco. Escolha de local.• Rejeito nuclear. Combustível nuclear usado. Risk perception. Siting. Nuclear waste. Spent nuclear fuel. |
topic |
Percepción de riesgo. Elección de lugar. Rechazo nuclear. Combustible nuclear usado. Percepção de risco. Escolha de local.• Rejeito nuclear. Combustível nuclear usado. Risk perception. Siting. Nuclear waste. Spent nuclear fuel. |
description |
This paper develops a conceptual and theoretical analysis of risk communication in cases where experts and the public have widely divergent views of the dimensions of a risk. Applications are chosen from among the risk management problems that are inherent to handling of spent nuclear fuel. One stresses the fact that the conflicting points of views have very different bases. The role of trust is analyzed and, as it is a crucial issue, it becomes much more encompassing than what has usually been assumed. The reasons for this difference can be found in risk perception models applied to survey data concerning risk perception and related attitudes. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-06-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138926 10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2007.138926 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138926 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2007.138926 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138926/134274 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Organicom info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Organicom |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Organicom; v. 4 n. 6 (2007): Comunicação de risco e crise: prevenção e gerenciamento; 66-85 2238-2593 1807-1236 reponame:Organicom (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Organicom (Online) |
collection |
Organicom (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Organicom (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaorganicom@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797047108413423616 |