Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. |
id |
USP-7_cea8c2cba416511868442f5de79df756 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/193092 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileirasReadability as a measure of textual complexity: determinants and evidence in Brazilian companiesComplexidade textualReadabilityBenchmark de referênciaPersistência dos resultadosTextual complexityReadabilityReference benchmarkEarnings persistenceThe aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. O objetivo deste artigo foi avaliar o efeito do resultado das empresas e da harmonização com as IFRS na readability do Relatório da Administração no mercado acionário brasileiro. Existe uma lacuna a ser preenchida, seja na elaboração e adaptação de medidas de readability ao contexto estudado, porque os estudos tendem a replicar as fórmulas originais, seja na identificação dos determinantes da readability nos relatórios de empresas brasileiras, pois as pesquisas nessa seara ainda são incipientes e os resultados, inconclusivos. Os resultados fornecem indícios para os investidores identificarem informações textuais complexas e podem auxiliar os formuladores de políticas públicas a instituir um manual de escrita simples, nos moldes do promovido pelo Plain English Handbook da SEC de 1998. As métricas modificadas e a desenvolvida superam as críticas sobre a utilização de fórmulas de readability nas pesquisas contábeis e podem ser utilizadas em substituição das métricas originais em pesquisas futuras. Foi utilizado um modelo econométrico apresentando os determinantes da readability. A readability foi calculada para a seção Análise dos Resultados do Relatório da Administração. O constructo resultado é entendido por três atributos: a persistência, o desempenho atual e o benchmark de referência. A harmonização com as IFRS é uma variável dummy, que delimita o período pré e pós-IFRS. As hipóteses foram testadas em uma amostra de empresas brasileiras constituída por 714 empresas-ano para o período de 2006 a 2019. Os resultados descritivos mostram que há uma aparente melhoria na readability dos relatórios na comparação do período pré e pós-IFRS. As evidências econométricas mostram que, no geral, as empresas com resultados persistentes e positivos apresentam relatórios menos complexos e têm chances de ter relatórios com alta readability, porque os gestores divulgam relatórios com melhor readability, para sinalizar ao mercado o resultado positivo.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária2021-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/19309210.1590/1808-057x202114180Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 33 n. 88 (2022); 112-129Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 No. 88 (2022); 112-129Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 Núm. 88 (2022); 112-1291808-057X1519-7077reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177894https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177893https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177895Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finançashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, João Antônio Salvador deBorba, José Alonso2022-10-06T18:10:21Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/193092Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprecont@usp.br||recont@usp.br1808-057X1519-7077opendoar:2022-10-06T18:10:21Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras Readability as a measure of textual complexity: determinants and evidence in Brazilian companies |
title |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
spellingShingle |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras Souza, João Antônio Salvador de Complexidade textual Readability Benchmark de referência Persistência dos resultados Textual complexity Readability Reference benchmark Earnings persistence |
title_short |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
title_full |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
title_fullStr |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
title_full_unstemmed |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
title_sort |
Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras |
author |
Souza, João Antônio Salvador de |
author_facet |
Souza, João Antônio Salvador de Borba, José Alonso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borba, José Alonso |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, João Antônio Salvador de Borba, José Alonso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Complexidade textual Readability Benchmark de referência Persistência dos resultados Textual complexity Readability Reference benchmark Earnings persistence |
topic |
Complexidade textual Readability Benchmark de referência Persistência dos resultados Textual complexity Readability Reference benchmark Earnings persistence |
description |
The aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092 10.1590/1808-057x202114180 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1808-057x202114180 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177894 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177893 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177895 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 33 n. 88 (2022); 112-129 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 No. 88 (2022); 112-129 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 Núm. 88 (2022); 112-129 1808-057X 1519-7077 reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) |
collection |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
recont@usp.br||recont@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713777909628928 |