Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, João Antônio Salvador de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Borba, José Alonso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092
Resumo: The aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. 
id USP-7_cea8c2cba416511868442f5de79df756
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/193092
network_acronym_str USP-7
network_name_str Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileirasReadability as a measure of textual complexity: determinants and evidence in Brazilian companiesComplexidade textualReadabilityBenchmark de referênciaPersistência dos resultadosTextual complexityReadabilityReference benchmarkEarnings persistenceThe aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. O objetivo deste artigo foi avaliar o efeito do resultado das empresas e da harmonização com as IFRS na readability do Relatório da Administração no mercado acionário brasileiro. Existe uma lacuna a ser preenchida, seja na elaboração e adaptação de medidas de readability ao contexto estudado, porque os estudos tendem a replicar as fórmulas originais, seja na identificação dos determinantes da readability nos relatórios de empresas brasileiras, pois as pesquisas nessa seara ainda são incipientes e os resultados, inconclusivos. Os resultados fornecem indícios para os investidores identificarem informações textuais complexas e podem auxiliar os formuladores de políticas públicas a instituir um manual de escrita simples, nos moldes do promovido pelo Plain English Handbook da SEC de 1998. As métricas modificadas e a desenvolvida superam as críticas sobre a utilização de fórmulas de readability nas pesquisas contábeis e podem ser utilizadas em substituição das métricas originais em pesquisas futuras. Foi utilizado um modelo econométrico apresentando os determinantes da readability. A readability foi calculada para a seção Análise dos Resultados do Relatório da Administração. O constructo resultado é entendido por três atributos: a persistência, o desempenho atual e o benchmark de referência. A harmonização com as IFRS é uma variável dummy, que delimita o período pré e pós-IFRS. As hipóteses foram testadas em uma amostra de empresas brasileiras constituída por 714 empresas-ano para o período de 2006 a 2019. Os resultados descritivos mostram que há uma aparente melhoria na readability dos relatórios na comparação do período pré e pós-IFRS. As evidências econométricas mostram que, no geral, as empresas com resultados persistentes e positivos apresentam relatórios menos complexos e têm chances de ter relatórios com alta readability, porque os gestores divulgam relatórios com melhor readability, para sinalizar ao mercado o resultado positivo.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária2021-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/19309210.1590/1808-057x202114180Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 33 n. 88 (2022); 112-129Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 No. 88 (2022); 112-129Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 Núm. 88 (2022); 112-1291808-057X1519-7077reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177894https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177893https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177895Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finançashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, João Antônio Salvador deBorba, José Alonso2022-10-06T18:10:21Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/193092Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprecont@usp.br||recont@usp.br1808-057X1519-7077opendoar:2022-10-06T18:10:21Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
Readability as a measure of textual complexity: determinants and evidence in Brazilian companies
title Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
spellingShingle Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
Souza, João Antônio Salvador de
Complexidade textual
Readability
Benchmark de referência
Persistência dos resultados
Textual complexity
Readability
Reference benchmark
Earnings persistence
title_short Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
title_full Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
title_fullStr Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
title_full_unstemmed Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
title_sort Readability como medida de complexidade textual: determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras
author Souza, João Antônio Salvador de
author_facet Souza, João Antônio Salvador de
Borba, José Alonso
author_role author
author2 Borba, José Alonso
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, João Antônio Salvador de
Borba, José Alonso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Complexidade textual
Readability
Benchmark de referência
Persistência dos resultados
Textual complexity
Readability
Reference benchmark
Earnings persistence
topic Complexidade textual
Readability
Benchmark de referência
Persistência dos resultados
Textual complexity
Readability
Reference benchmark
Earnings persistence
description The aim of this article was to evaluate the effect of company earnings and of harmonization with IFRS on the readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian stock market. There is a gap to be filled both in the elaboration and adaptation of readability measures to the context studied, as the studies tend to replicate the original formulas, and in identifying the determinants of the readability of Brazilian company reports, as the research in this field remains in its infancy and the results are inconclusive. The results provide indications for investors to identify complex textual information and may help public policymakers to establish a simple writing manual, along the lines of the SEC’s 1998 Plain English Handbook. The modified metrics and the one developed overcome the criticisms regarding the use of readability formulas in accounting research and could be used in substitution of the original metrics in future studies. An econometric model was used that presents the determinants of readability. Readability was calculated for the Results Analysis section of the Management Report. The resulting construct is understood via three attributes: persistence, current performance, and the reference benchmark. Harmonization with IFRS is a dummy variable, which delimits the pre- and post-IFRS periods. The hypotheses were tested in a sample of Brazilian companies made up of 714 company-year observations covering the period from 2006 to 2019. The descriptive results show that there is an apparent improvement in the readability of the reports in the pre- and post-IFRS period comparison. The econometric evidence shows that, in general, companies with persistent and positive earnings present less complex reports and are more likely to have highly readable reports, because managers publish reports with better readability to signal positive results to the market. 
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092
10.1590/1808-057x202114180
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1808-057x202114180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177894
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177893
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/193092/177895
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 33 n. 88 (2022); 112-129
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 No. 88 (2022); 112-129
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 33 Núm. 88 (2022); 112-129
1808-057X
1519-7077
reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
collection Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv recont@usp.br||recont@usp.br
_version_ 1787713777909628928