Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12192 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse indexes and scales that assess poststroke patients upper extremity function, as well as their psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation for Brazil. The search through Medline, Lilacs and Scielo databases led to selecting 57 articles on instruments for assessing arms global motor and specific functions, as well as articles on their validation and psychometric properties. Eleven such instruments were found, among which the Fugl-Meyer assessment, the Arm Motor Ability Test, and the Functional Independence Measure have been translated and validated into Brazilian Portuguese, and had their validity and reliability properties established as appropriate. These instruments showed to be complementary for assessing upper extremity function in poststroke patients in as much as they respectively include structural and functional aspects, task performance, self-care and interpersonal relations, being therefore recommended for clinical use. |
id |
USP-9_29f5703138f70109c3a27a79385d4ba0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/12192 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-9 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review Instrumentos de avaliação da função de membros superiores após acidente vascular encefálico: uma revisão sistemática Acidente cerebral vascular^i1^scomplicaçAvaliaçãoExtremidade superiorQuestionários^i1^sutilizaRevisãoEvaluationQuestionnaires^i2^sutilizatReviewStroke^i2^scomplicatiUpper extremity The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse indexes and scales that assess poststroke patients upper extremity function, as well as their psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation for Brazil. The search through Medline, Lilacs and Scielo databases led to selecting 57 articles on instruments for assessing arms global motor and specific functions, as well as articles on their validation and psychometric properties. Eleven such instruments were found, among which the Fugl-Meyer assessment, the Arm Motor Ability Test, and the Functional Independence Measure have been translated and validated into Brazilian Portuguese, and had their validity and reliability properties established as appropriate. These instruments showed to be complementary for assessing upper extremity function in poststroke patients in as much as they respectively include structural and functional aspects, task performance, self-care and interpersonal relations, being therefore recommended for clinical use. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática da literatura foi analisar os instrumentos de avaliação da função de membros superiores em indivíduos que sofreram acidente vascular encefálico (AVE), bem como suas propriedades psicométricas e adaptação cultural para o Brasil. A busca nas bases de dados eletrônicas Medline, Lilacs e Scielo levaram à seleção de 57 artigos sobre instrumentos de avaliação da função motora global, da função específica da extremidade superior, bem como os relativos à validação e avaliação das propriedades psicométricas das escalas. Foram encontrados 11 instrumentos de avaliação da função de membros superiores. Destes, a escala de Fugl-Meyer, o teste de habilidade motora do membro superior e a medida de independência funcional são traduzidos e validados para a língua portuguesa e têm sua validade, confiabilidade e reprodutibilidade determinadas e adequadas. Esses instrumentos mostram-se complementares na avaliação da função de membros superiores de pacientes que sofreram AVE, pois incluem aspectos relativos à estrutura e função corporal, à capacidade de execução de tarefas, e ao cuidado pessoal e relações interpessoais, respectivamente, sendo portanto recomendáveis para o uso clínico. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/1219210.1590/S1809-29502010000200015Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010); 178-183 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-183 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 17 n. 2 (2010); 178-183 2316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12192/13969Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavaco, Natália SperandioAlouche, Sandra Regina2012-05-13T16:02:55Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/12192Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2012-05-13T16:02:55Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review Instrumentos de avaliação da função de membros superiores após acidente vascular encefálico: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review Cavaco, Natália Sperandio Acidente cerebral vascular^i1^scomplicaç Avaliação Extremidade superior Questionários^i1^sutiliza Revisão Evaluation Questionnaires^i2^sutilizat Review Stroke^i2^scomplicati Upper extremity |
title_short |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
title_full |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Upper limb functional outcome instruments for poststroke patients: a systematic review |
author |
Cavaco, Natália Sperandio |
author_facet |
Cavaco, Natália Sperandio Alouche, Sandra Regina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alouche, Sandra Regina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavaco, Natália Sperandio Alouche, Sandra Regina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acidente cerebral vascular^i1^scomplicaç Avaliação Extremidade superior Questionários^i1^sutiliza Revisão Evaluation Questionnaires^i2^sutilizat Review Stroke^i2^scomplicati Upper extremity |
topic |
Acidente cerebral vascular^i1^scomplicaç Avaliação Extremidade superior Questionários^i1^sutiliza Revisão Evaluation Questionnaires^i2^sutilizat Review Stroke^i2^scomplicati Upper extremity |
description |
The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse indexes and scales that assess poststroke patients upper extremity function, as well as their psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation for Brazil. The search through Medline, Lilacs and Scielo databases led to selecting 57 articles on instruments for assessing arms global motor and specific functions, as well as articles on their validation and psychometric properties. Eleven such instruments were found, among which the Fugl-Meyer assessment, the Arm Motor Ability Test, and the Functional Independence Measure have been translated and validated into Brazilian Portuguese, and had their validity and reliability properties established as appropriate. These instruments showed to be complementary for assessing upper extremity function in poststroke patients in as much as they respectively include structural and functional aspects, task performance, self-care and interpersonal relations, being therefore recommended for clinical use. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12192 10.1590/S1809-29502010000200015 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12192 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1809-29502010000200015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12192/13969 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010); 178-183 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-183 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 17 n. 2 (2010); 178-183 2316-9117 1809-2950 reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
collection |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revfisio@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713733993168896 |