Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Guedes, Dartagnan Pinto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099
Resumo: The identification of plantar pressure during gait is used by clinicians and researchers to verify burden on the plantar structure. In this study, different protocols have been employed for this purpose. The aim of this study was to verify the reproducibility and agreement of shortened gait protocols to identify dynamic plantar pressure in asymptomatic young people. Fifteen volunteers were submitted to the shortened one-step and three-step protocols and to the standard midgait protocol in three moments: initial, after one day and after seven days. For each of the eight foot masks, the measurements of peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were considered. Reproducibility was analyzed by one-way Anova test and intraclass correlation coefficient, while the agreement between the protocols was verified through paired t-test, Pearson’s moment-product correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The results showed that the three-step protocol presented higher reproducibility in both measurements of dynamic plantar pressure. Regarding the agreement between protocols, although the shortened ones showed a tendency to underestimate the standard midgait measurements, most foot masks showed no statistical differences between mean scores. Furthermore, through the Bland-Altman technique, there was substantial agreement capacity between the one-step, three-step and midgait protocols measurements. In conclusion, the shortened protocols should be selected according to the measurement of interest of plantar pressure and foot masks to be analyzed. The evidence of reproducibility and agreement was more favorable for the use of the three-step protocol.
id USP-9_6c31d8c2389422d09d5bdbf87313bbe7
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/187099
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminarReproducibilidad y concordancia entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometría dinámica durante la marcha: un estudio preliminarReproducibility and agreement between different protocols of dynamic baropodometry during gait: a preliminary studyPéConfiabilidade dos DadosAnálise da MarchaPieExactitud de los DatosAnálisis de la MarchaFootData AccuracyGait AnalysisThe identification of plantar pressure during gait is used by clinicians and researchers to verify burden on the plantar structure. In this study, different protocols have been employed for this purpose. The aim of this study was to verify the reproducibility and agreement of shortened gait protocols to identify dynamic plantar pressure in asymptomatic young people. Fifteen volunteers were submitted to the shortened one-step and three-step protocols and to the standard midgait protocol in three moments: initial, after one day and after seven days. For each of the eight foot masks, the measurements of peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were considered. Reproducibility was analyzed by one-way Anova test and intraclass correlation coefficient, while the agreement between the protocols was verified through paired t-test, Pearson’s moment-product correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The results showed that the three-step protocol presented higher reproducibility in both measurements of dynamic plantar pressure. Regarding the agreement between protocols, although the shortened ones showed a tendency to underestimate the standard midgait measurements, most foot masks showed no statistical differences between mean scores. Furthermore, through the Bland-Altman technique, there was substantial agreement capacity between the one-step, three-step and midgait protocols measurements. In conclusion, the shortened protocols should be selected according to the measurement of interest of plantar pressure and foot masks to be analyzed. The evidence of reproducibility and agreement was more favorable for the use of the three-step protocol.A identificação da pressão plantar durante a marcha é utilizada por clínicos e investigadores para verificar sobrecarga na estrutura podal. Neste particular, diferentes protocolos têm sido empregados para essa finalidade. O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a reprodutibilidade e a concordância de protocolos abreviados de marcha para identificar a pressão plantar dinâmica em jovens assintomáticos. Quinze voluntários foram submetidos aos protocolos abreviados one-step e three-step e ao protocolo padrão midgait em três momentos: inicial, dia seguinte e após sete dias. Para cada uma das oito máscaras podais, foram consideradas as medidas de pico de pressão plantar e integral pressão/tempo. A reprodutibilidade foi analisada mediante Anova one-way e coeficiente de correlação intraclasse, enquanto a concordância entre os protocolos foi verificada através de teste t pareado, correlação momento-produto de Pearson e plotagem de Bland-Altman. Os resultados apontaram que o protocolo three-step apresentou mais elevada reprodutibilidade em ambas as medidas de pressão plantar dinâmica. Quanto à concordância entre os protocolos, apesar de os abreviados demonstrarem tendência em subestimar as medidas produzidas pelo protocolo padrão midgait, na maioria das máscaras podais não foram identificadas diferenças estatísticas entre os escores médios. Ainda, por intermédio da técnica de Bland-Altman, constatou-se substancial capacidade de concordância entre as medidas identificadas pelos protocolos one-step, three-step e midgait. Concluindo, os protocolos abreviados devem ser selecionados de acordo com a medida de interesse da pressão plantar e a máscara podal a ser analisada, surgindo evidências de reprodutibilidade e concordância mais favoráveis para o uso do protocolo three-step. Descritores |The identification of plantar pressure during gait is used by clinicians and researchers to verify burden on the plantar structure. In this study, different protocols have been employed for this purpose. The aim of this study was to verify the reproducibility and agreement of shortened gait protocols to identify dynamic plantar pressure in asymptomatic young people. Fifteen volunteers were submitted to the shortened one-step and three-step protocols and to the standard midgait protocol in three moments: initial, after one day and after seven days. For each of the eight foot masks, the measurements of peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were considered. Reproducibility was analyzed by one-way Anova test and intraclass correlation coefficient, while the agreement between the protocols was verified through paired t-test, Pearson’s moment-product correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The results showed that the three-step protocol presented higher reproducibility in both measurements of dynamic plantar pressure. Regarding the agreement between protocols, although the shortened ones showed a tendency to underestimate the standard midgait measurements, most foot masks showed no statistical differences between mean scores. Furthermore, through the Bland-Altman technique, there was substantial agreement capacity between the one-step, three-step and midgait protocols measurements. In conclusion, the shortened protocols should be selected according to the measurement of interest of plantar pressure and foot masks to be analyzed. The evidence of reproducibility and agreement was more favorable for the use of the three-step protocol.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2020-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/18709910.1590/1809-2950/17018227042020Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2020); 337-346Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 27 Núm. 4 (2020); 337-346Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 27 n. 4 (2020); 337-3462316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099/172842https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099/172845Copyright (c) 2020 Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes Rogério, Dartagnan Pinto Guedeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto GuedesGuedes, Dartagnan Pinto2023-05-26T13:20:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/187099Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T13:20:57Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
Reproducibilidad y concordancia entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometría dinámica durante la marcha: un estudio preliminar
Reproducibility and agreement between different protocols of dynamic baropodometry during gait: a preliminary study
title Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
spellingShingle Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
Rogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes
Pé
Confiabilidade dos Dados
Análise da Marcha
Pie
Exactitud de los Datos
Análisis de la Marcha
Foot
Data Accuracy
Gait Analysis
title_short Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
title_full Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
title_fullStr Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
title_full_unstemmed Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
title_sort Reprodutibilidade e concordância entre diferentes protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica durante a marcha: um estudo preliminar
author Rogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes
author_facet Rogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes
Guedes, Dartagnan Pinto
author_role author
author2 Guedes, Dartagnan Pinto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rogério, Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes
Guedes, Dartagnan Pinto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pé
Confiabilidade dos Dados
Análise da Marcha
Pie
Exactitud de los Datos
Análisis de la Marcha
Foot
Data Accuracy
Gait Analysis
topic Pé
Confiabilidade dos Dados
Análise da Marcha
Pie
Exactitud de los Datos
Análisis de la Marcha
Foot
Data Accuracy
Gait Analysis
description The identification of plantar pressure during gait is used by clinicians and researchers to verify burden on the plantar structure. In this study, different protocols have been employed for this purpose. The aim of this study was to verify the reproducibility and agreement of shortened gait protocols to identify dynamic plantar pressure in asymptomatic young people. Fifteen volunteers were submitted to the shortened one-step and three-step protocols and to the standard midgait protocol in three moments: initial, after one day and after seven days. For each of the eight foot masks, the measurements of peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were considered. Reproducibility was analyzed by one-way Anova test and intraclass correlation coefficient, while the agreement between the protocols was verified through paired t-test, Pearson’s moment-product correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The results showed that the three-step protocol presented higher reproducibility in both measurements of dynamic plantar pressure. Regarding the agreement between protocols, although the shortened ones showed a tendency to underestimate the standard midgait measurements, most foot masks showed no statistical differences between mean scores. Furthermore, through the Bland-Altman technique, there was substantial agreement capacity between the one-step, three-step and midgait protocols measurements. In conclusion, the shortened protocols should be selected according to the measurement of interest of plantar pressure and foot masks to be analyzed. The evidence of reproducibility and agreement was more favorable for the use of the three-step protocol.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099
10.1590/1809-2950/17018227042020
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1809-2950/17018227042020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099/172842
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/187099/172845
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes Rogério, Dartagnan Pinto Guedes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Fernando Raphael Pinto Guedes Rogério, Dartagnan Pinto Guedes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2020); 337-346
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 27 Núm. 4 (2020); 337-346
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 27 n. 4 (2020); 337-346
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713740235341825

Registros relacionados