Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fregadolli, Patrícia
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Sasseron, Ana Beatriz, Lanzoni, Kelly Cristiane, Figueiredo, Luciana Castilho de, Cardoso, Andrea Luciana, Lima, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12167
Resumo: Respiratory function tests are used to determinate severity, functional consequences and progress of pulmonary and neuromotor dysfunctions. Methodological variations - by means of a mouthpiece or a facemask - and patient's cooperation may interfere in manoeuvre performance and affect measures. The aim of this study was to compare lung volume values (tidal volume [VT] and minute volume [Vm]), respiratory rate (RR), and vital capacity (VC) in healthy individuals when assessed by using a mouthpiece and a facemask. A total of 60 healthy subjects (14 men and 46 women), mean aged 22.86±7.14 years, were evaluated. Items used were a disposable, semi-rigid mouthpiece, with a nose clip, and a plastic facemask with pneumatic inflatable sealing. Measures obtained were statistically compared, with significance level set at 5%. Mean values obtained with the mouthpiece and the facemask were, respectively: RR, 15 rpm x 13 rpm (p
id USP-9_a973407bfc2fb6bba541efc1c1420393
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/12167
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects Comparação entre o uso de bocal e máscara facial na avaliação de volumes pulmonares e capacidade vital em indivíduos saudáveis Capacidade vitalMedidas de volume pulmonarTestes respiratórios/instrumentaçãoBreath tests/instrumentationLung volume measurementsVital capacity Respiratory function tests are used to determinate severity, functional consequences and progress of pulmonary and neuromotor dysfunctions. Methodological variations - by means of a mouthpiece or a facemask - and patient's cooperation may interfere in manoeuvre performance and affect measures. The aim of this study was to compare lung volume values (tidal volume [VT] and minute volume [Vm]), respiratory rate (RR), and vital capacity (VC) in healthy individuals when assessed by using a mouthpiece and a facemask. A total of 60 healthy subjects (14 men and 46 women), mean aged 22.86±7.14 years, were evaluated. Items used were a disposable, semi-rigid mouthpiece, with a nose clip, and a plastic facemask with pneumatic inflatable sealing. Measures obtained were statistically compared, with significance level set at 5%. Mean values obtained with the mouthpiece and the facemask were, respectively: RR, 15 rpm x 13 rpm (p Testes de função pulmonar são usados para determinar a gravidade, as conseqüências funcionais e o progresso de disfunções pulmonares e neuromusculares. As variações metodológicas com o bocal e a máscara facial e a cooperação do paciente podem interferir no desempenho das manobras e afetar as medidas. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os valores de volumes pulmonares (volume corrente [Vc], volume-minuto [Vm]), freqüência respiratória (FR) e capacidade vital (CV) em indivíduos saudáveis quando avaliados por meio do bocal e da máscara facial. Participaram do estudo 60 voluntários saudáveis, 14 homens e 46 mulheres, com média de idade de 22,9±7,1 anos. Para a avaliação com bocal, utilizou-se uma peça semirrígida descartável e clipe nasal; a máscara usada foi facial plástica com borda pneumática inflável. As medidas obtidas foram comparadas estatisticamente (nível de significância 5%). Os valores obtidos com o bocal e com a máscara facial foram, respectivamente: FR, 15 rpm x 13 rpm (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2010-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/1216710.1590/S1809-29502010000100006Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010); 30-33 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2010); 30-33 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 17 n. 1 (2010); 30-33 2316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12167/13944Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFregadolli, PatríciaSasseron, Ana BeatrizLanzoni, Kelly CristianeFigueiredo, Luciana Castilho deCardoso, Andrea LucianaLima, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira2012-05-13T16:01:25Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/12167Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2012-05-13T16:01:25Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
Comparação entre o uso de bocal e máscara facial na avaliação de volumes pulmonares e capacidade vital em indivíduos saudáveis
title Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
spellingShingle Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
Fregadolli, Patrícia
Capacidade vital
Medidas de volume pulmonar
Testes respiratórios/instrumentação
Breath tests/instrumentation
Lung volume measurements
Vital capacity
title_short Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
title_full Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
title_fullStr Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
title_sort Comparison between the use of mouthpiece and facemask in assessing lung volumes and vital capacity in healthy subjects
author Fregadolli, Patrícia
author_facet Fregadolli, Patrícia
Sasseron, Ana Beatriz
Lanzoni, Kelly Cristiane
Figueiredo, Luciana Castilho de
Cardoso, Andrea Luciana
Lima, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira
author_role author
author2 Sasseron, Ana Beatriz
Lanzoni, Kelly Cristiane
Figueiredo, Luciana Castilho de
Cardoso, Andrea Luciana
Lima, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fregadolli, Patrícia
Sasseron, Ana Beatriz
Lanzoni, Kelly Cristiane
Figueiredo, Luciana Castilho de
Cardoso, Andrea Luciana
Lima, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Capacidade vital
Medidas de volume pulmonar
Testes respiratórios/instrumentação
Breath tests/instrumentation
Lung volume measurements
Vital capacity
topic Capacidade vital
Medidas de volume pulmonar
Testes respiratórios/instrumentação
Breath tests/instrumentation
Lung volume measurements
Vital capacity
description Respiratory function tests are used to determinate severity, functional consequences and progress of pulmonary and neuromotor dysfunctions. Methodological variations - by means of a mouthpiece or a facemask - and patient's cooperation may interfere in manoeuvre performance and affect measures. The aim of this study was to compare lung volume values (tidal volume [VT] and minute volume [Vm]), respiratory rate (RR), and vital capacity (VC) in healthy individuals when assessed by using a mouthpiece and a facemask. A total of 60 healthy subjects (14 men and 46 women), mean aged 22.86±7.14 years, were evaluated. Items used were a disposable, semi-rigid mouthpiece, with a nose clip, and a plastic facemask with pneumatic inflatable sealing. Measures obtained were statistically compared, with significance level set at 5%. Mean values obtained with the mouthpiece and the facemask were, respectively: RR, 15 rpm x 13 rpm (p
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12167
10.1590/S1809-29502010000100006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12167
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1809-29502010000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12167/13944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010); 30-33
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2010); 30-33
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 17 n. 1 (2010); 30-33
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713733938642944

Registros relacionados