Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Frazão, Joaquim José
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/64/64134/tde-08082018-134654/
Resumo: Most soils in the world have low phosphate (P) availability, especially in tropical regions where most soils are highly weathered and rich in strong P adsorbents such as iron and aluminium sesquioxides, which limit the plant growth. Thus, large amounts of P fertilizers have been applied annually on crops to meet P requirements, which have declined the world\'s mineral P reserves.On the other hand, large amounts of P can be recycled from organic wastes like poultry litter (PL). However, inadequate disposal of PL on soil surface promotes environmental contamination (e.g., eutrophication). In this context, the use of PL to produce organomineral P fertilizers (OMF) represents a suitable alternative to recycle P from PL and reduce the dependence on mineral P reserves. In this study, we carried out a pot and a field experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of a granular PL-derived OMF in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.).The pot experiment was conducted in a greenhouse arranged in a completely randomized design with 2x4+1 factorial treatments with four replications. We tested OMF against triple superphosphate (TSP) at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg P kg-1 in two contrasting soils in term of P adsorption capacity (PAC): a clayey Oxisol and a sandy Entisol. In the soil with high PAC (Oxisol), granular OMF was as effective as TSP, but in the Entisol, TSP promoted higher P uptake and higher fertilizer P recovery than OMF. Thus, the agronomic effectiveness of OMF is dependent on the P adsorption capacity of soil. With respect to the field trial, we used a randomized complete block with 2x4+1 factorial treatments and four replications. The soil is classified as Ultisol. The factors corresponded to two P sources (OMF and single superphosphate, SSP) and five P rates: 0, 17.5, 35, 52.5 and 70 kg P ha-1 for maize and, 0, 13, 26, 39 and 52 kg P ha-1 for soybean. There was no difference between OMF and SSP on the shoot dry weight (SDW) and grain yields. Similar trend was observed for plant P uptake.Additionally, OMF had a significant higher relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) based on the SDW compared to SSP. Furthermore, OMF also had a higher RAE based on the P uptake than SSP in maize and a higher RAE based on the grain yield in soybean. Thus, we conclude that OMF is an effective substitute to conventional P fertilizers and, at the same time contributes to reducingenvironmental contamination associated to inadequate disposal of PL
id USP_6d5f98c2c39739ce63eef7f91b5a75ff
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-08082018-134654
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybeanEficiência agronômica de um fertilizante organomineral produzido a partir de cama de frango em milho e sojaEficiência de uso de fósforoEntisolGlycine max LGlycine max LLatossoloNeossoloOxisolPhosphorus use efficiencyZea mays LZea mays LMost soils in the world have low phosphate (P) availability, especially in tropical regions where most soils are highly weathered and rich in strong P adsorbents such as iron and aluminium sesquioxides, which limit the plant growth. Thus, large amounts of P fertilizers have been applied annually on crops to meet P requirements, which have declined the world\'s mineral P reserves.On the other hand, large amounts of P can be recycled from organic wastes like poultry litter (PL). However, inadequate disposal of PL on soil surface promotes environmental contamination (e.g., eutrophication). In this context, the use of PL to produce organomineral P fertilizers (OMF) represents a suitable alternative to recycle P from PL and reduce the dependence on mineral P reserves. In this study, we carried out a pot and a field experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of a granular PL-derived OMF in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.).The pot experiment was conducted in a greenhouse arranged in a completely randomized design with 2x4+1 factorial treatments with four replications. We tested OMF against triple superphosphate (TSP) at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg P kg-1 in two contrasting soils in term of P adsorption capacity (PAC): a clayey Oxisol and a sandy Entisol. In the soil with high PAC (Oxisol), granular OMF was as effective as TSP, but in the Entisol, TSP promoted higher P uptake and higher fertilizer P recovery than OMF. Thus, the agronomic effectiveness of OMF is dependent on the P adsorption capacity of soil. With respect to the field trial, we used a randomized complete block with 2x4+1 factorial treatments and four replications. The soil is classified as Ultisol. The factors corresponded to two P sources (OMF and single superphosphate, SSP) and five P rates: 0, 17.5, 35, 52.5 and 70 kg P ha-1 for maize and, 0, 13, 26, 39 and 52 kg P ha-1 for soybean. There was no difference between OMF and SSP on the shoot dry weight (SDW) and grain yields. Similar trend was observed for plant P uptake.Additionally, OMF had a significant higher relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) based on the SDW compared to SSP. Furthermore, OMF also had a higher RAE based on the P uptake than SSP in maize and a higher RAE based on the grain yield in soybean. Thus, we conclude that OMF is an effective substitute to conventional P fertilizers and, at the same time contributes to reducingenvironmental contamination associated to inadequate disposal of PLA maioria dos solos no mundo possui baixa disponibilidade de fósforo (P), especialmente nas regiões tropicais, onde a maioria dos solos são bastante intemperizados e ricos em fortes adsorventes de P como sesquióxidos de ferro e de alumínio, os quais limitam o crescimento das plantas. Assim, grandes quantidades de fertilizantes fosfatados têm sido aplicadas anualmente em cultivos para atender a demanda de P pelas culturas, o que tem reduzido as reservas minerais de fósforo. Por outro lado, grandes quantidades de P podem ser recicladas a partir de resíduos orgânicos como a cama de frango (CF). No entanto, aplicação inadequada de CF no solo resulta em contaminação ambiental (ex. eutrofização). Nesse contexto, o uso de CF na produção de fertilizantes organominerais (FOM) representa uma alternativa adequada para reciclar P de CF e ao mesmo tempo, reduzindo a dependência das reservas minerais de P. Nesse estudo, foram conduzidos dois experimentos, um em vasos e outro em condições de campo com intuito de avaliar a eficiência de um fertilizante organomineral granulado produzido a partir de CF nas culturas do milho (Zeamays L.) e da soja (Glycinemax L.). O primeiro foi conduzido em casa de vegetação utilizando o delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 2x4+1 com quatro repetições. FOM foi comparado com superfosfato triplo (SFT) nas doses de 0, 25, 50, 75 e 100 mg P kg-1em dois solos contrastantes em termos de capacidade de adsorção de P (CAP): um Latossolo argiloso e um Neossolo arenoso. No solo com elevada CAP (Latossolo), o FOM foi mais eficiente que o SFT, porém no Neossolo, SFT promoveu maior absorção de P bem como maior recuperação do P aplicado comparado ao FOM. Dessa forma, a eficiência agronômica do FOM granulado depende da CAP do solo. Em relação experimento de campo, foi utilizado o delineamento de blocos completos casualizados em esquema fatorial 2x4+1 com quatro repetições. O solo da área é classificado como Nitossolo. Os fatores correspondem a duas fontes de P (FOM e superfosfato simples, SFS) e cinco doses de P: 0, 17.5, 35, 52.5 e 70 kg P ha-1para milho e, 0, 13, 26, 39 e 52 kg P ha-1para soja. Não houve diferença entre FOM e SFS na produtividade de grãos, produção de massa seca de parte aérea de plantas (MSPA) e na absorção de P. Adicionalmente, FOM teve uma maior eficiência agronômica relativa (EAR) como base na produção de MSPA comparado ao SFS. Além disso, FOM também obteve maior EAR baseado na absorção de P na cultura do milho e maior EAR com base na produtividade de grãos na cultura da soja. Conclui-se que FOM pode substituir fertilizantes fosfatados convencionais bem como, reduzir a contaminação ambiental decorrente da disposição inadequada de CFBiblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPBenites, Vinicius de MeloLavres Junior, JoséFrazão, Joaquim José2017-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/64/64134/tde-08082018-134654/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2018-11-01T16:25:01Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-08082018-134654Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212018-11-01T16:25:01Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
Eficiência agronômica de um fertilizante organomineral produzido a partir de cama de frango em milho e soja
title Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
spellingShingle Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
Frazão, Joaquim José
Eficiência de uso de fósforo
Entisol
Glycine max L
Glycine max L
Latossolo
Neossolo
Oxisol
Phosphorus use efficiency
Zea mays L
Zea mays L
title_short Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
title_full Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
title_fullStr Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
title_sort Agronomic effectiveness of a poultry litter-derived organomineral phosphate fertilizer in maize and soybean
author Frazão, Joaquim José
author_facet Frazão, Joaquim José
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Benites, Vinicius de Melo
Lavres Junior, José
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Frazão, Joaquim José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eficiência de uso de fósforo
Entisol
Glycine max L
Glycine max L
Latossolo
Neossolo
Oxisol
Phosphorus use efficiency
Zea mays L
Zea mays L
topic Eficiência de uso de fósforo
Entisol
Glycine max L
Glycine max L
Latossolo
Neossolo
Oxisol
Phosphorus use efficiency
Zea mays L
Zea mays L
description Most soils in the world have low phosphate (P) availability, especially in tropical regions where most soils are highly weathered and rich in strong P adsorbents such as iron and aluminium sesquioxides, which limit the plant growth. Thus, large amounts of P fertilizers have been applied annually on crops to meet P requirements, which have declined the world\'s mineral P reserves.On the other hand, large amounts of P can be recycled from organic wastes like poultry litter (PL). However, inadequate disposal of PL on soil surface promotes environmental contamination (e.g., eutrophication). In this context, the use of PL to produce organomineral P fertilizers (OMF) represents a suitable alternative to recycle P from PL and reduce the dependence on mineral P reserves. In this study, we carried out a pot and a field experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of a granular PL-derived OMF in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.).The pot experiment was conducted in a greenhouse arranged in a completely randomized design with 2x4+1 factorial treatments with four replications. We tested OMF against triple superphosphate (TSP) at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg P kg-1 in two contrasting soils in term of P adsorption capacity (PAC): a clayey Oxisol and a sandy Entisol. In the soil with high PAC (Oxisol), granular OMF was as effective as TSP, but in the Entisol, TSP promoted higher P uptake and higher fertilizer P recovery than OMF. Thus, the agronomic effectiveness of OMF is dependent on the P adsorption capacity of soil. With respect to the field trial, we used a randomized complete block with 2x4+1 factorial treatments and four replications. The soil is classified as Ultisol. The factors corresponded to two P sources (OMF and single superphosphate, SSP) and five P rates: 0, 17.5, 35, 52.5 and 70 kg P ha-1 for maize and, 0, 13, 26, 39 and 52 kg P ha-1 for soybean. There was no difference between OMF and SSP on the shoot dry weight (SDW) and grain yields. Similar trend was observed for plant P uptake.Additionally, OMF had a significant higher relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) based on the SDW compared to SSP. Furthermore, OMF also had a higher RAE based on the P uptake than SSP in maize and a higher RAE based on the grain yield in soybean. Thus, we conclude that OMF is an effective substitute to conventional P fertilizers and, at the same time contributes to reducingenvironmental contamination associated to inadequate disposal of PL
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/64/64134/tde-08082018-134654/
url http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/64/64134/tde-08082018-134654/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1815256807564640256