Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Juliana Stuginski
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25146/tde-06122021-165216/
Resumo: The presented study intended to compare two methods for assessing Sleep Bruxism (SB): International Classification of Sleep Disorders diagnostic criteria (ICSD-3) and a portable single-channel electromyography (EMG) device (Grindcare) with gold standard polysomnographic (PSG) examination. The comparison with PSG was used to determine an appropriate cut-off value and the number of nights of sleep with the Grindcare device necessary for a valid/reliable SB diagnosis. Twenty consecutive post-graduate students and staff at Bauru School of Dentistry composed the sample. Each participant underwent interview, clinical assessment, the Grindcare for five consecutive nights and a PSG exam. The discrimination between bruxers and non-bruxers was based only on the PSG analysis. Data about electromyography per hour with Grindcare (EMG/h) and PSG (bursts/h) were scored. The validity of ICSD-3 criteria and the Grindcare device were assessed by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis (AUC), likelihood ratios (LR), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and Bland-Altman analysis. The ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria items for SB had fair to moderate concordance with PSG diagnosis, with AUC ranging from 0.55 to 0.75. The best value of agreement was obtained by the report of SB more than once a week associated with a report of transient morning jaw muscle pain or fatigue with a moderate, but significant agreement with the PSG SB diagnosis (AUC=0.75) with 90% specificity, positive LR=6 and DOR=13.5. When the frequency of self-reported SB increased to more than 4 times per week, the combination of this finding with tooth wear had also high values of agreement with PSG SB diagnosis (AUC= 0.75, LR=6, DOR=13.6). Bland-Altman analysis of the EMG bursts/h showed positive agreement between Grindcare device and PSG exam. The ROC analyses also showed that using a minimum of 18 EMG/h for 3 nights and 19 EMG/h for 5 nights in Grindcare as cut-offs resulted in a 90% specificity and positive LR equal to 5. Since there is considerable heterogeneity in the results, the application of ICSD-3 for SB clinical diagnosis may be limited. Moreover, the Grindcare is able to predict SB diagnosed by PSG with a reasonable accuracy, when used for 3 or 5 consecutives nights, and it may be a valid choice in clinical practice for SB assessment.
id USP_8ef8b65c67d35d6522ed8038dad42251
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-06122021-165216
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep BruxismValidação do uso de questionários, exame físico e aparelho portátil de eletromiografia para o diagnóstico do Bruxismo do SonoBruxismo do sonoDesgaste dos dentesDiagnosisDiagnósticoDistúrbios do SonoDor facialFacial painPolissonografiaPolysomnographySleep bruxismSleep disordersTooth WearThe presented study intended to compare two methods for assessing Sleep Bruxism (SB): International Classification of Sleep Disorders diagnostic criteria (ICSD-3) and a portable single-channel electromyography (EMG) device (Grindcare) with gold standard polysomnographic (PSG) examination. The comparison with PSG was used to determine an appropriate cut-off value and the number of nights of sleep with the Grindcare device necessary for a valid/reliable SB diagnosis. Twenty consecutive post-graduate students and staff at Bauru School of Dentistry composed the sample. Each participant underwent interview, clinical assessment, the Grindcare for five consecutive nights and a PSG exam. The discrimination between bruxers and non-bruxers was based only on the PSG analysis. Data about electromyography per hour with Grindcare (EMG/h) and PSG (bursts/h) were scored. The validity of ICSD-3 criteria and the Grindcare device were assessed by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis (AUC), likelihood ratios (LR), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and Bland-Altman analysis. The ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria items for SB had fair to moderate concordance with PSG diagnosis, with AUC ranging from 0.55 to 0.75. The best value of agreement was obtained by the report of SB more than once a week associated with a report of transient morning jaw muscle pain or fatigue with a moderate, but significant agreement with the PSG SB diagnosis (AUC=0.75) with 90% specificity, positive LR=6 and DOR=13.5. When the frequency of self-reported SB increased to more than 4 times per week, the combination of this finding with tooth wear had also high values of agreement with PSG SB diagnosis (AUC= 0.75, LR=6, DOR=13.6). Bland-Altman analysis of the EMG bursts/h showed positive agreement between Grindcare device and PSG exam. The ROC analyses also showed that using a minimum of 18 EMG/h for 3 nights and 19 EMG/h for 5 nights in Grindcare as cut-offs resulted in a 90% specificity and positive LR equal to 5. Since there is considerable heterogeneity in the results, the application of ICSD-3 for SB clinical diagnosis may be limited. Moreover, the Grindcare is able to predict SB diagnosed by PSG with a reasonable accuracy, when used for 3 or 5 consecutives nights, and it may be a valid choice in clinical practice for SB assessment.O presente trabalho comparou dois métodos de diagnóstico para Bruxismo do Sono (BS): critérios de diagnóstico da Classificação Internacional de Distúrbios do Sono (ICSD-3) e um aparelho portátil com um canal de eletromiografia (EMG) (Grindcare) com o exame padrão ouro, polissonografia (PSG). A comparação com a PSG foi utilizada para determinar valores de corte apropriados e o número de noites necessárias para diagnóstico do BS válido e confiável com o Grindcare. Vinte estudantes da pós graduação e funcionários da Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru participaram da amostra. Cada participante se submeteu a entrevista, exame físico, uso do Grindcare por cinco noites consecutivas e exame de PSG. A descriminação entre participantes com e sem bruxismo foi baseado somente na análise da PSG. Dados sobre EMG por hora de uso do Grindcare (EMG/h) e PSG (bursts/h) foram anotados. A validade dos critérios ICSD-3 e do Grindcare foram avaliados pela análise da área sob a curva (ASC) ROC (receiver operating characteristics), razão de probabilidade (RP), razão de possibilidade de diagnóstico (RPD) e análise de Bland-Altman. Os itens do ICSD-3 para BS obtiveram pouca a moderada concordância com o diagnóstico por PSG, com ASC de 0,55 até 0,75. O melhor valor de concordância obtido foi o relato de BS mais do que uma vez na semana associado ao relato de dor transitória na musculatura mastigatória ou fadiga pela manhã com moderada, mas significativa concordância, (ASC=0,75) com especificidade de 90, RP positiva=6 e RPD=13,5. Quando a frequência do relato de BS aumentou para 4 vezes na semana, a combinação do relato com desgaste dentário também apresentou valores altos de concordância com o diagnóstico realizado através de PSG (ASC= 0,75, RP=6, RPD=13,6). A análise de Bland-Altman dos EMG bursts/h mostrou uma concordância positiva entre os resultados do Grindcare e PSG. A análise pela curva ROC também mostrou que, se utilizado o mínimo de 18 EMG/h por 3 noites e 19 EMG/h por 5 noites de uso do Grindcare como valores de corte, a especificidade do teste é de 90% e a RP positiva de 5. Como há considerável heterogeneidade nos resultados, a aplicação dos critérios de diagnóstico da ICSD-3 para BS pode estar limitada. Ainda, o aparelho Grindcare está apto a predizer BS diagnosticado pela PSG, quando utilizado por 3 ou 5 noites consecutivas, e pode ser um recurso válido para a prática clínica.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPConti, Paulo Cesar RodriguesBarbosa, Juliana Stuginski2015-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25146/tde-06122021-165216/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2021-12-09T20:05:03Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-06122021-165216Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212021-12-09T20:05:03Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
Validação do uso de questionários, exame físico e aparelho portátil de eletromiografia para o diagnóstico do Bruxismo do Sono
title Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
spellingShingle Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
Barbosa, Juliana Stuginski
Bruxismo do sono
Desgaste dos dentes
Diagnosis
Diagnóstico
Distúrbios do Sono
Dor facial
Facial pain
Polissonografia
Polysomnography
Sleep bruxism
Sleep disorders
Tooth Wear
title_short Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
title_full Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
title_fullStr Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
title_sort Diagnostic validity of the use of questionnaires, clinical examination and a portable single-channel electromyography device for Sleep Bruxism
author Barbosa, Juliana Stuginski
author_facet Barbosa, Juliana Stuginski
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Conti, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Juliana Stuginski
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bruxismo do sono
Desgaste dos dentes
Diagnosis
Diagnóstico
Distúrbios do Sono
Dor facial
Facial pain
Polissonografia
Polysomnography
Sleep bruxism
Sleep disorders
Tooth Wear
topic Bruxismo do sono
Desgaste dos dentes
Diagnosis
Diagnóstico
Distúrbios do Sono
Dor facial
Facial pain
Polissonografia
Polysomnography
Sleep bruxism
Sleep disorders
Tooth Wear
description The presented study intended to compare two methods for assessing Sleep Bruxism (SB): International Classification of Sleep Disorders diagnostic criteria (ICSD-3) and a portable single-channel electromyography (EMG) device (Grindcare) with gold standard polysomnographic (PSG) examination. The comparison with PSG was used to determine an appropriate cut-off value and the number of nights of sleep with the Grindcare device necessary for a valid/reliable SB diagnosis. Twenty consecutive post-graduate students and staff at Bauru School of Dentistry composed the sample. Each participant underwent interview, clinical assessment, the Grindcare for five consecutive nights and a PSG exam. The discrimination between bruxers and non-bruxers was based only on the PSG analysis. Data about electromyography per hour with Grindcare (EMG/h) and PSG (bursts/h) were scored. The validity of ICSD-3 criteria and the Grindcare device were assessed by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis (AUC), likelihood ratios (LR), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and Bland-Altman analysis. The ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria items for SB had fair to moderate concordance with PSG diagnosis, with AUC ranging from 0.55 to 0.75. The best value of agreement was obtained by the report of SB more than once a week associated with a report of transient morning jaw muscle pain or fatigue with a moderate, but significant agreement with the PSG SB diagnosis (AUC=0.75) with 90% specificity, positive LR=6 and DOR=13.5. When the frequency of self-reported SB increased to more than 4 times per week, the combination of this finding with tooth wear had also high values of agreement with PSG SB diagnosis (AUC= 0.75, LR=6, DOR=13.6). Bland-Altman analysis of the EMG bursts/h showed positive agreement between Grindcare device and PSG exam. The ROC analyses also showed that using a minimum of 18 EMG/h for 3 nights and 19 EMG/h for 5 nights in Grindcare as cut-offs resulted in a 90% specificity and positive LR equal to 5. Since there is considerable heterogeneity in the results, the application of ICSD-3 for SB clinical diagnosis may be limited. Moreover, the Grindcare is able to predict SB diagnosed by PSG with a reasonable accuracy, when used for 3 or 5 consecutives nights, and it may be a valid choice in clinical practice for SB assessment.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25146/tde-06122021-165216/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25146/tde-06122021-165216/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1815256734814437376