Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/4000 |
Resumo: | This study explores democratic practice in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic in the light of globally prescribed and acceptable norms, tenets and values of democracy as a form of government. The study was conducted in Nigeria and adopted a multistage sampling technique to administer questionnaire to 700 delegates across the six (6) geopolitical zones of Nigeria’s 36 States. The results and findings show that Nigeria’s democracy is plagued with massive electoral fraud, including intimidation, disenfranchisement of eligible contestants and voters from participating in the democratic process, corruption of the election process, scam, and fraudulent declaration of winners of elections. The implications of such democratic deceit in Nigeria’s democracy includes voter apathy resulting from lack of confidence in the democratic process and outcome, violence and political instability and the nonparticipation of qualified and honest citizens in the politics of Nigeria. Consequently, leaders that emerge from Nigeria’s democratic politics are not always the choice of the people, which explains why they are not accountable to the people as well as why there is deficit of public trust in Nigeria’s democratic system. |
id |
UTFPR-4_a40d4301bb8868e49d66d2f021e556f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.utfpr:article/4000 |
network_acronym_str |
UTFPR-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criminality and election outcomes in NigeriaElection, Election fraud, Democracy, Criminality, NigeriaThis study explores democratic practice in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic in the light of globally prescribed and acceptable norms, tenets and values of democracy as a form of government. The study was conducted in Nigeria and adopted a multistage sampling technique to administer questionnaire to 700 delegates across the six (6) geopolitical zones of Nigeria’s 36 States. The results and findings show that Nigeria’s democracy is plagued with massive electoral fraud, including intimidation, disenfranchisement of eligible contestants and voters from participating in the democratic process, corruption of the election process, scam, and fraudulent declaration of winners of elections. The implications of such democratic deceit in Nigeria’s democracy includes voter apathy resulting from lack of confidence in the democratic process and outcome, violence and political instability and the nonparticipation of qualified and honest citizens in the politics of Nigeria. Consequently, leaders that emerge from Nigeria’s democratic politics are not always the choice of the people, which explains why they are not accountable to the people as well as why there is deficit of public trust in Nigeria’s democratic system.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Suleiman, Barnabas2016-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/400010.3895/rbpd.v5n1.4000Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento; v. 5, n. 1 (2016); 67-792317-236310.3895/rbpd.v5n1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimentoinstname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPRenghttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/4000/2867Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimentohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-19T15:46:45Zoai:periodicos.utfpr:article/4000Revistahttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpdPUBhttp://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/oai||rbpd-ct@utfpr.edu.br2317-23632317-2363opendoar:2017-06-19T15:46:45Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
title |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
spellingShingle |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria Suleiman, Barnabas Election, Election fraud, Democracy, Criminality, Nigeria |
title_short |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
title_full |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
title_fullStr |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
title_sort |
Criminality and election outcomes in Nigeria |
author |
Suleiman, Barnabas |
author_facet |
Suleiman, Barnabas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Suleiman, Barnabas |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Election, Election fraud, Democracy, Criminality, Nigeria |
topic |
Election, Election fraud, Democracy, Criminality, Nigeria |
description |
This study explores democratic practice in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic in the light of globally prescribed and acceptable norms, tenets and values of democracy as a form of government. The study was conducted in Nigeria and adopted a multistage sampling technique to administer questionnaire to 700 delegates across the six (6) geopolitical zones of Nigeria’s 36 States. The results and findings show that Nigeria’s democracy is plagued with massive electoral fraud, including intimidation, disenfranchisement of eligible contestants and voters from participating in the democratic process, corruption of the election process, scam, and fraudulent declaration of winners of elections. The implications of such democratic deceit in Nigeria’s democracy includes voter apathy resulting from lack of confidence in the democratic process and outcome, violence and political instability and the nonparticipation of qualified and honest citizens in the politics of Nigeria. Consequently, leaders that emerge from Nigeria’s democratic politics are not always the choice of the people, which explains why they are not accountable to the people as well as why there is deficit of public trust in Nigeria’s democratic system. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/4000 10.3895/rbpd.v5n1.4000 |
url |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/4000 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3895/rbpd.v5n1.4000 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbpd/article/view/4000/2867 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento; v. 5, n. 1 (2016); 67-79 2317-2363 10.3895/rbpd.v5n1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) instacron:UTFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
instacron_str |
UTFPR |
institution |
UTFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbpd-ct@utfpr.edu.br |
_version_ |
1809283851050024960 |