Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filus, Walderes Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
Texto Completo: http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1460
Resumo: The increase of noise level is a problem which has been currently identified in health institutions. The general goal of this study is to assess noise environment as well as the noise perception of nursing team and administrative staff in the emergency room. It is a descriptive quantitative study. Noise perception was evidenced by means of a questionnaire applied during an interview. Fifty-nine (59) professionals participated in the study, being 38 from the nursing team and 21 from the administrative staff. In order to evaluate noise level, a calibrated Bruel & Kjaer 2230 Integrating Sound Level Meter was used. Results showed that both teams perceived to be more exposed to biological, ergonomics and accident hazards than to physical hazards. Noise was spontaneously mentioned as a physical hazard by 8.4% of the participants. The most reported health problems by the professionals were fatigue, stress, anxiety and irritability. The professionals correlated these health problems with occupational reasons rather than extra occupational ones. Noise levels measured Leq. dB(A) ranging from 56.6 to 68.8 dB(A), high above the recommended comfort levels for hospital settings. Nursing professionals can better identify noise produced by equipment, while the administrative staff can better identify noise produced by people. Noise produced by people is the one that really bothers them. Afternoon shift is the noisiest, which was evidenced in the several noise level measurements, and ultimately perceived by the administrative staff. Only the administrative staff reported concentration and communication difficulties due to the noise. The nursing team stated that they produce noise that may bother others while the administrative staff denied this fact. The teams recognize hearing loss as the greatest harm caused by noise. Mentioned prevention attitudes were the use of ear protectors and avoidance of noisy places. It can be concluded that participants perceive emergency settings as noisy; nursing professionals are more disturbed by noise, but administrative staff refers to difficulties in carrying out their tasks due to noise. Both teams perceive hearing loss as one of the harmful effects caused by noise and mention stop talking as one of the attitudes to avoid noise. All noise measurements are above the acoustic comfort level established by noise guideline 10,152/1987.
id UTP_947d4cca0027d8daa0891aa6a88dcc41
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/1460
network_acronym_str UTP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
spelling Lacerda, Adriana B. M. deGonçalves, Cláudia Giglio de O.Conto, Juliana dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3487964153504814Filus, Walderes Aparecida2018-07-05T13:46:50Z2012-03-23Filus, Walderes Aparecida. Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho. 2012. 106 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Distúrbios da Comunicação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2012.http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1460The increase of noise level is a problem which has been currently identified in health institutions. The general goal of this study is to assess noise environment as well as the noise perception of nursing team and administrative staff in the emergency room. It is a descriptive quantitative study. Noise perception was evidenced by means of a questionnaire applied during an interview. Fifty-nine (59) professionals participated in the study, being 38 from the nursing team and 21 from the administrative staff. In order to evaluate noise level, a calibrated Bruel & Kjaer 2230 Integrating Sound Level Meter was used. Results showed that both teams perceived to be more exposed to biological, ergonomics and accident hazards than to physical hazards. Noise was spontaneously mentioned as a physical hazard by 8.4% of the participants. The most reported health problems by the professionals were fatigue, stress, anxiety and irritability. The professionals correlated these health problems with occupational reasons rather than extra occupational ones. Noise levels measured Leq. dB(A) ranging from 56.6 to 68.8 dB(A), high above the recommended comfort levels for hospital settings. Nursing professionals can better identify noise produced by equipment, while the administrative staff can better identify noise produced by people. Noise produced by people is the one that really bothers them. Afternoon shift is the noisiest, which was evidenced in the several noise level measurements, and ultimately perceived by the administrative staff. Only the administrative staff reported concentration and communication difficulties due to the noise. The nursing team stated that they produce noise that may bother others while the administrative staff denied this fact. The teams recognize hearing loss as the greatest harm caused by noise. Mentioned prevention attitudes were the use of ear protectors and avoidance of noisy places. It can be concluded that participants perceive emergency settings as noisy; nursing professionals are more disturbed by noise, but administrative staff refers to difficulties in carrying out their tasks due to noise. Both teams perceive hearing loss as one of the harmful effects caused by noise and mention stop talking as one of the attitudes to avoid noise. All noise measurements are above the acoustic comfort level established by noise guideline 10,152/1987.O aumento da intensidade sonora é um problema atual que vem sendo identificado nas instituições de saúde. O estudo tem por objetivo geral avaliar o ambiente sonoro e a percepção da equipe de enfermagem e administrativa frente ao ruído no pronto-socorro. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo com análise quantitativa. A percepção do ruído foi levantada por meio de um questionário aplicado na forma de entrevista. Participaram do estudo 59 profissionais, sendo 38 da área de enfermagem (AE) e 21 da área administrativa (AD). Nas avaliações da intensidade sonora, foi utilizado um Medidor Integrador Marca Bruel e Kjaer tipo 2230 devidamente calibrado. Os resultados demonstraram que ambas as equipes percebem estarem mais expostas aos riscos biológicos, ergonômicos e de acidentes, do que aos riscos físicos. O ruído surgiu espontaneamente como risco físico para 8,4% dos participantes. Os problemas de saúde mais relacionados dos profissionais foram cansaço, estresse, ansiedade e irritabilidade. Os profissionais correlacionaram esses problemas de saúde mais a fatores ocupacionais do que extraocupacionais. A medição da intensidade sonora apresentou Leq. dB(A) que variou de 56,6 a 68,8 dB(A), níveis considerados muito acima do recomendado para conforto em ambientes hospitalares. Os profissionais da enfermagem identificam mais os ruídos dos equipamentos, e a equipe administrativa, os ruídos das pessoas. O ruído considerado incômodo é o produzido pelas pessoas. O turno de maior ruído é o da tarde, e esses resultados foram comprovados nas várias avaliações da intensidade sonora e percebidos especialmente pela equipe administrativa. Apenas a equipe administrativa referiu dificuldades de concentração e comunicação diante do ruído. Os profissionais da AE consideram produzir ruídos que podem incomodar os outros e os da AD negam esse fato. As equipes conhecem a perda auditiva como o principal malefício causado pelo ruído. As atitudes de prevenção referidas foram o uso de protetor auricular e evitar locais ruidosos. Conclui-se que os participantes têm a percepção que o ambiente de pronto-socorro é ruidoso, os profissionais da enfermagem são os mais incomodados com o ruído, mas são os profissionais administrativos que referem dificuldades em desempenhar suas tarefas diante do ruído. Ambas as equipes conhecem a perda auditiva como um dos malefícios causados pelo ruído e referem parar de falar como uma das atitudes para evitar o ruído. Todas as avaliações da intensidade sonora estão acima dos níveis de conforto acústico estabelecido pela NR 10.152/1987.Submitted by Divanete Paiva (divanete.paiva@utp.br) on 2018-07-05T13:46:50Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AMBIENTE SONORO EM.pdf: 1087090 bytes, checksum: 707b40d80a7b75bd096cf06b6b17d26c (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-05T13:46:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AMBIENTE SONORO EM.pdf: 1087090 bytes, checksum: 707b40d80a7b75bd096cf06b6b17d26c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-23application/pdfporUniversidade Tuiuti do ParanaMestrado em Distúrbios da ComunicaçãoUTPBrasilDistúrbios da ComunicaçãoPercepção auditivaRuídoServiços médicos de emergênciaRiscos ocupacionaisAuditory perceptionNoiseEmergency medical servicesOccupational risksCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIAAmbiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-6104338271566220491500500600-1465691230269154980-1446670330325391347info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTPinstname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paranáinstacron:UTPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1460/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALAMBIENTE SONORO EM.pdfAMBIENTE SONORO EM.pdfapplication/pdf1087090http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1460/2/AMBIENTE+SONORO+EM.pdf707b40d80a7b75bd096cf06b6b17d26cMD52tede/1460oai:localhost:tede/14602018-07-05 10:46:50.557TEDEtede@utp.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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
title Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
spellingShingle Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
Filus, Walderes Aparecida
Percepção auditiva
Ruído
Serviços médicos de emergência
Riscos ocupacionais
Auditory perception
Noise
Emergency medical services
Occupational risks
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
title_short Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
title_full Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
title_fullStr Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
title_full_unstemmed Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
title_sort Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho
author Filus, Walderes Aparecida
author_facet Filus, Walderes Aparecida
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Lacerda, Adriana B. M. de
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Cláudia Giglio de O.
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Conto, Juliana de
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3487964153504814
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filus, Walderes Aparecida
contributor_str_mv Lacerda, Adriana B. M. de
Gonçalves, Cláudia Giglio de O.
Conto, Juliana de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Percepção auditiva
Ruído
Serviços médicos de emergência
Riscos ocupacionais
topic Percepção auditiva
Ruído
Serviços médicos de emergência
Riscos ocupacionais
Auditory perception
Noise
Emergency medical services
Occupational risks
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Auditory perception
Noise
Emergency medical services
Occupational risks
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv The increase of noise level is a problem which has been currently identified in health institutions. The general goal of this study is to assess noise environment as well as the noise perception of nursing team and administrative staff in the emergency room. It is a descriptive quantitative study. Noise perception was evidenced by means of a questionnaire applied during an interview. Fifty-nine (59) professionals participated in the study, being 38 from the nursing team and 21 from the administrative staff. In order to evaluate noise level, a calibrated Bruel & Kjaer 2230 Integrating Sound Level Meter was used. Results showed that both teams perceived to be more exposed to biological, ergonomics and accident hazards than to physical hazards. Noise was spontaneously mentioned as a physical hazard by 8.4% of the participants. The most reported health problems by the professionals were fatigue, stress, anxiety and irritability. The professionals correlated these health problems with occupational reasons rather than extra occupational ones. Noise levels measured Leq. dB(A) ranging from 56.6 to 68.8 dB(A), high above the recommended comfort levels for hospital settings. Nursing professionals can better identify noise produced by equipment, while the administrative staff can better identify noise produced by people. Noise produced by people is the one that really bothers them. Afternoon shift is the noisiest, which was evidenced in the several noise level measurements, and ultimately perceived by the administrative staff. Only the administrative staff reported concentration and communication difficulties due to the noise. The nursing team stated that they produce noise that may bother others while the administrative staff denied this fact. The teams recognize hearing loss as the greatest harm caused by noise. Mentioned prevention attitudes were the use of ear protectors and avoidance of noisy places. It can be concluded that participants perceive emergency settings as noisy; nursing professionals are more disturbed by noise, but administrative staff refers to difficulties in carrying out their tasks due to noise. Both teams perceive hearing loss as one of the harmful effects caused by noise and mention stop talking as one of the attitudes to avoid noise. All noise measurements are above the acoustic comfort level established by noise guideline 10,152/1987.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv O aumento da intensidade sonora é um problema atual que vem sendo identificado nas instituições de saúde. O estudo tem por objetivo geral avaliar o ambiente sonoro e a percepção da equipe de enfermagem e administrativa frente ao ruído no pronto-socorro. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo com análise quantitativa. A percepção do ruído foi levantada por meio de um questionário aplicado na forma de entrevista. Participaram do estudo 59 profissionais, sendo 38 da área de enfermagem (AE) e 21 da área administrativa (AD). Nas avaliações da intensidade sonora, foi utilizado um Medidor Integrador Marca Bruel e Kjaer tipo 2230 devidamente calibrado. Os resultados demonstraram que ambas as equipes percebem estarem mais expostas aos riscos biológicos, ergonômicos e de acidentes, do que aos riscos físicos. O ruído surgiu espontaneamente como risco físico para 8,4% dos participantes. Os problemas de saúde mais relacionados dos profissionais foram cansaço, estresse, ansiedade e irritabilidade. Os profissionais correlacionaram esses problemas de saúde mais a fatores ocupacionais do que extraocupacionais. A medição da intensidade sonora apresentou Leq. dB(A) que variou de 56,6 a 68,8 dB(A), níveis considerados muito acima do recomendado para conforto em ambientes hospitalares. Os profissionais da enfermagem identificam mais os ruídos dos equipamentos, e a equipe administrativa, os ruídos das pessoas. O ruído considerado incômodo é o produzido pelas pessoas. O turno de maior ruído é o da tarde, e esses resultados foram comprovados nas várias avaliações da intensidade sonora e percebidos especialmente pela equipe administrativa. Apenas a equipe administrativa referiu dificuldades de concentração e comunicação diante do ruído. Os profissionais da AE consideram produzir ruídos que podem incomodar os outros e os da AD negam esse fato. As equipes conhecem a perda auditiva como o principal malefício causado pelo ruído. As atitudes de prevenção referidas foram o uso de protetor auricular e evitar locais ruidosos. Conclui-se que os participantes têm a percepção que o ambiente de pronto-socorro é ruidoso, os profissionais da enfermagem são os mais incomodados com o ruído, mas são os profissionais administrativos que referem dificuldades em desempenhar suas tarefas diante do ruído. Ambas as equipes conhecem a perda auditiva como um dos malefícios causados pelo ruído e referem parar de falar como uma das atitudes para evitar o ruído. Todas as avaliações da intensidade sonora estão acima dos níveis de conforto acústico estabelecido pela NR 10.152/1987.
description The increase of noise level is a problem which has been currently identified in health institutions. The general goal of this study is to assess noise environment as well as the noise perception of nursing team and administrative staff in the emergency room. It is a descriptive quantitative study. Noise perception was evidenced by means of a questionnaire applied during an interview. Fifty-nine (59) professionals participated in the study, being 38 from the nursing team and 21 from the administrative staff. In order to evaluate noise level, a calibrated Bruel & Kjaer 2230 Integrating Sound Level Meter was used. Results showed that both teams perceived to be more exposed to biological, ergonomics and accident hazards than to physical hazards. Noise was spontaneously mentioned as a physical hazard by 8.4% of the participants. The most reported health problems by the professionals were fatigue, stress, anxiety and irritability. The professionals correlated these health problems with occupational reasons rather than extra occupational ones. Noise levels measured Leq. dB(A) ranging from 56.6 to 68.8 dB(A), high above the recommended comfort levels for hospital settings. Nursing professionals can better identify noise produced by equipment, while the administrative staff can better identify noise produced by people. Noise produced by people is the one that really bothers them. Afternoon shift is the noisiest, which was evidenced in the several noise level measurements, and ultimately perceived by the administrative staff. Only the administrative staff reported concentration and communication difficulties due to the noise. The nursing team stated that they produce noise that may bother others while the administrative staff denied this fact. The teams recognize hearing loss as the greatest harm caused by noise. Mentioned prevention attitudes were the use of ear protectors and avoidance of noisy places. It can be concluded that participants perceive emergency settings as noisy; nursing professionals are more disturbed by noise, but administrative staff refers to difficulties in carrying out their tasks due to noise. Both teams perceive hearing loss as one of the harmful effects caused by noise and mention stop talking as one of the attitudes to avoid noise. All noise measurements are above the acoustic comfort level established by noise guideline 10,152/1987.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-03-23
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-05T13:46:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Filus, Walderes Aparecida. Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho. 2012. 106 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Distúrbios da Comunicação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1460
identifier_str_mv Filus, Walderes Aparecida. Ambiente sonoro em pronto-socorro e a percepção de equipes de trabalho. 2012. 106 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Distúrbios da Comunicação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2012.
url http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1460
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -6104338271566220491
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -1465691230269154980
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -1446670330325391347
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Distúrbios da Comunicação
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UTP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Distúrbios da Comunicação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron:UTP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname_str Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron_str UTP
institution UTP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1460/1/license.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1460/2/AMBIENTE+SONORO+EM.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
707b40d80a7b75bd096cf06b6b17d26c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv TEDE
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tede@utp.br
_version_ 1623392710307086336