Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
Texto Completo: | http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542 |
Resumo: | If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system. |
id |
UTP_9758b3185a1c0468b46676cdbe81a195 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:tede/1542 |
network_acronym_str |
UTP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
spelling |
Araujo, DenizeUchôa, Fábio RaddiVeiga, Roberta Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7013897278525990Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela2018-08-16T17:35:35Z2017-06-30Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017.http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system.Se crítica é toda e qualquer reflexão sobre uma obra, partindo desta mesma obra para gerar relações de sentido que interferem na fruição de quem com ela interage, é patente seu impacto e dimensão enquanto promotora de crise. Partindo desta ideia, este trabalho empreende um mergulho na produção crítica produzida sobre o cinema brasileiro contemporâneo, dito de Retomada, para assim analisar como se estrutura a reflexão cinematográfica. Ao eleger três filmes de forte articulação metalinguística será possível notar como o discurso sobre o cinema se manifesta em suas respectivas críticas. Através das análises desses textos, este trabalho busca compreender como o pensamento crítico se manifesta e percebe o cinema. Para isso, me proponho a conceituar a crítica de cinema através de sua constituição teórica em relação à história do cinema partindo de autores como André Bazin, Walter Benjamin e Jean-Claude Bernardet. A crítica é repensada em sua dimensão coletiva, se configurando como sistema crítico, como proposto por José Luís Braga. Procuro também conceituar o cinema contemporâneo brasileiro, inserindo-o em um contexto histórico em relação à crítica, formas de produção e recepção do público através dos relatos histórico-críticos de autores como Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda e Laurent Debois. Este referencial será usado como base para analisar os filmes levantados – Lisbela e o Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirinas e Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; e Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado – diante de seu contexto de produção e lançamento, bem como suas respectivas críticas para, por fim, refletir sobre a constituição da crítica de cinema contemporânea e como ela percebe o Cinema de Retomada enquanto formulador de hipóteses sobre o próprio cinema, tanto através de contribuições pontuais, quanto através de sua constituição como sistema.Submitted by Divanete Paiva (divanete.paiva@utp.br) on 2018-08-16T17:35:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 PENSAR CINEMA.pdf: 2571989 bytes, checksum: bd4733d6def7556ab767f0765c5325a8 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-16T17:35:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PENSAR CINEMA.pdf: 2571989 bytes, checksum: bd4733d6def7556ab767f0765c5325a8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-30application/pdfporUniversidade Tuiuti do ParanaMestrado em Comunicação e LinguagensUTPBrasilComunicação e LinguagensCinemaCrítica de cinemaRetomadaMetalinguagemMovie theaterFilm criticismRetakeMetalanguageCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAOPensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis2739379193455549176500500600-6072174809281298930-4056021055502874573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTPinstname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paranáinstacron:UTPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALPENSAR CINEMA.pdfPENSAR CINEMA.pdfapplication/pdf2053320http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/2/PENSAR+CINEMA.pdff3f78851c2e084153c90f873d7ba9910MD52tede/1542oai:localhost:tede/15422018-08-16 14:50:23.886TEDEtede@utp.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 |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
title |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
spellingShingle |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela Cinema Crítica de cinema Retomada Metalinguagem Movie theater Film criticism Retake Metalanguage CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
title_short |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
title_full |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
title_fullStr |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
title_sort |
Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada |
author |
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Araujo, Denize |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Uchôa, Fábio Raddi |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Veiga, Roberta Oliveira |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7013897278525990 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela |
contributor_str_mv |
Araujo, Denize Uchôa, Fábio Raddi Veiga, Roberta Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cinema Crítica de cinema Retomada Metalinguagem |
topic |
Cinema Crítica de cinema Retomada Metalinguagem Movie theater Film criticism Retake Metalanguage CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Movie theater Film criticism Retake Metalanguage |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
Se crítica é toda e qualquer reflexão sobre uma obra, partindo desta mesma obra para gerar relações de sentido que interferem na fruição de quem com ela interage, é patente seu impacto e dimensão enquanto promotora de crise. Partindo desta ideia, este trabalho empreende um mergulho na produção crítica produzida sobre o cinema brasileiro contemporâneo, dito de Retomada, para assim analisar como se estrutura a reflexão cinematográfica. Ao eleger três filmes de forte articulação metalinguística será possível notar como o discurso sobre o cinema se manifesta em suas respectivas críticas. Através das análises desses textos, este trabalho busca compreender como o pensamento crítico se manifesta e percebe o cinema. Para isso, me proponho a conceituar a crítica de cinema através de sua constituição teórica em relação à história do cinema partindo de autores como André Bazin, Walter Benjamin e Jean-Claude Bernardet. A crítica é repensada em sua dimensão coletiva, se configurando como sistema crítico, como proposto por José Luís Braga. Procuro também conceituar o cinema contemporâneo brasileiro, inserindo-o em um contexto histórico em relação à crítica, formas de produção e recepção do público através dos relatos histórico-críticos de autores como Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda e Laurent Debois. Este referencial será usado como base para analisar os filmes levantados – Lisbela e o Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirinas e Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; e Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado – diante de seu contexto de produção e lançamento, bem como suas respectivas críticas para, por fim, refletir sobre a constituição da crítica de cinema contemporânea e como ela percebe o Cinema de Retomada enquanto formulador de hipóteses sobre o próprio cinema, tanto através de contribuições pontuais, quanto através de sua constituição como sistema. |
description |
If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-30 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-16T17:35:35Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542 |
identifier_str_mv |
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017. |
url |
http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
2739379193455549176 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6072174809281298930 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-4056021055502874573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tuiuti do Parana |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UTP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Comunicação e Linguagens |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tuiuti do Parana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP instname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná instacron:UTP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
instname_str |
Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná |
instacron_str |
UTP |
institution |
UTP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/1/license.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/2/PENSAR+CINEMA.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 f3f78851c2e084153c90f873d7ba9910 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
TEDE |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tede@utp.br |
_version_ |
1623392711307427840 |