Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
Texto Completo: http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542
Resumo: If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system.
id UTP_9758b3185a1c0468b46676cdbe81a195
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/1542
network_acronym_str UTP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
spelling Araujo, DenizeUchôa, Fábio RaddiVeiga, Roberta Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7013897278525990Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela2018-08-16T17:35:35Z2017-06-30Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017.http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system.Se crítica é toda e qualquer reflexão sobre uma obra, partindo desta mesma obra para gerar relações de sentido que interferem na fruição de quem com ela interage, é patente seu impacto e dimensão enquanto promotora de crise. Partindo desta ideia, este trabalho empreende um mergulho na produção crítica produzida sobre o cinema brasileiro contemporâneo, dito de Retomada, para assim analisar como se estrutura a reflexão cinematográfica. Ao eleger três filmes de forte articulação metalinguística será possível notar como o discurso sobre o cinema se manifesta em suas respectivas críticas. Através das análises desses textos, este trabalho busca compreender como o pensamento crítico se manifesta e percebe o cinema. Para isso, me proponho a conceituar a crítica de cinema através de sua constituição teórica em relação à história do cinema partindo de autores como André Bazin, Walter Benjamin e Jean-Claude Bernardet. A crítica é repensada em sua dimensão coletiva, se configurando como sistema crítico, como proposto por José Luís Braga. Procuro também conceituar o cinema contemporâneo brasileiro, inserindo-o em um contexto histórico em relação à crítica, formas de produção e recepção do público através dos relatos histórico-críticos de autores como Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda e Laurent Debois. Este referencial será usado como base para analisar os filmes levantados – Lisbela e o Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirinas e Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; e Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado – diante de seu contexto de produção e lançamento, bem como suas respectivas críticas para, por fim, refletir sobre a constituição da crítica de cinema contemporânea e como ela percebe o Cinema de Retomada enquanto formulador de hipóteses sobre o próprio cinema, tanto através de contribuições pontuais, quanto através de sua constituição como sistema.Submitted by Divanete Paiva (divanete.paiva@utp.br) on 2018-08-16T17:35:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 PENSAR CINEMA.pdf: 2571989 bytes, checksum: bd4733d6def7556ab767f0765c5325a8 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-16T17:35:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PENSAR CINEMA.pdf: 2571989 bytes, checksum: bd4733d6def7556ab767f0765c5325a8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-30application/pdfporUniversidade Tuiuti do ParanaMestrado em Comunicação e LinguagensUTPBrasilComunicação e LinguagensCinemaCrítica de cinemaRetomadaMetalinguagemMovie theaterFilm criticismRetakeMetalanguageCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAOPensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis2739379193455549176500500600-6072174809281298930-4056021055502874573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTPinstname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paranáinstacron:UTPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALPENSAR CINEMA.pdfPENSAR CINEMA.pdfapplication/pdf2053320http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/2/PENSAR+CINEMA.pdff3f78851c2e084153c90f873d7ba9910MD52tede/1542oai:localhost:tede/15422018-08-16 14:50:23.886TEDEtede@utp.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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
title Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
spellingShingle Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela
Cinema
Crítica de cinema
Retomada
Metalinguagem
Movie theater
Film criticism
Retake
Metalanguage
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
title_short Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
title_full Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
title_fullStr Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
title_full_unstemmed Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
title_sort Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada
author Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela
author_facet Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Araujo, Denize
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Uchôa, Fábio Raddi
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Veiga, Roberta Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7013897278525990
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela
contributor_str_mv Araujo, Denize
Uchôa, Fábio Raddi
Veiga, Roberta Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cinema
Crítica de cinema
Retomada
Metalinguagem
topic Cinema
Crítica de cinema
Retomada
Metalinguagem
Movie theater
Film criticism
Retake
Metalanguage
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Movie theater
Film criticism
Retake
Metalanguage
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv Se crítica é toda e qualquer reflexão sobre uma obra, partindo desta mesma obra para gerar relações de sentido que interferem na fruição de quem com ela interage, é patente seu impacto e dimensão enquanto promotora de crise. Partindo desta ideia, este trabalho empreende um mergulho na produção crítica produzida sobre o cinema brasileiro contemporâneo, dito de Retomada, para assim analisar como se estrutura a reflexão cinematográfica. Ao eleger três filmes de forte articulação metalinguística será possível notar como o discurso sobre o cinema se manifesta em suas respectivas críticas. Através das análises desses textos, este trabalho busca compreender como o pensamento crítico se manifesta e percebe o cinema. Para isso, me proponho a conceituar a crítica de cinema através de sua constituição teórica em relação à história do cinema partindo de autores como André Bazin, Walter Benjamin e Jean-Claude Bernardet. A crítica é repensada em sua dimensão coletiva, se configurando como sistema crítico, como proposto por José Luís Braga. Procuro também conceituar o cinema contemporâneo brasileiro, inserindo-o em um contexto histórico em relação à crítica, formas de produção e recepção do público através dos relatos histórico-críticos de autores como Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda e Laurent Debois. Este referencial será usado como base para analisar os filmes levantados – Lisbela e o Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirinas e Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; e Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado – diante de seu contexto de produção e lançamento, bem como suas respectivas críticas para, por fim, refletir sobre a constituição da crítica de cinema contemporânea e como ela percebe o Cinema de Retomada enquanto formulador de hipóteses sobre o próprio cinema, tanto através de contribuições pontuais, quanto através de sua constituição como sistema.
description If criticism is any reflection on a work, starting from this same work to generate relations of meaning that interfere with the enjoyment of those who interact with it, it is clear its impact and dimension as a promoter of crisis. Starting from this idea, this work undertakes a dip in the critical production produced on contemporary Brazilian cinema, said of Retomada, in order to analyze how the cinematographic reflection is structured. By choosing three films with strong metalinguistic articulation, it will be possible to see how the discourse on cinema manifests itself in their respective criticisms. Through the analysis of these texts, this work seeks to understand how critical thinking manifests itself and perceives cinema. To that end, I propose to conceptualize film criticism through its theoretical constitution in relation to the history of cinema, starting with authors such as André Bazin, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Claude Bernardet. Criticism is rethought in its collective dimension, forming itself as a critical system, as proposed by José Luís Braga. I also seek to conceptualize contemporary Brazilian cinema, inserting it in a historical context in relation to criticism, forms of production and reception of the public through the historical-critical accounts of authors such as Paulo Emílio Sales Gomes, Ismail Xavier, Marcelo Ikeda and Laurent Debois. This reference will be used as a basis to analyze the films raised - Lisbela and Prisioneiro (2003), Guel Arraes; Cinema, Aspirins and Urubus (2005), Marcelo Gomes; and Saneamento Básico, O Filme (2007), Jorge Furtado - in view of its context of production and launching, as well as their respective criticisms, in order to reflect on the constitution of contemporary film criticism and how it perceives Cinema de Resomada formulator of hypotheses about the cinema itself, both through punctual contributions and through its constitution as a system.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-06-30
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-08-16T17:35:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542
identifier_str_mv Teixeira, Luiz Gustavo Vilela. Pensar cinema: o sistema crítico no cinema de retomada. 2017. 158 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017.
url http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1542
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 2739379193455549176
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6072174809281298930
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -4056021055502874573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Comunicação e Linguagens
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UTP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Comunicação e Linguagens
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron:UTP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname_str Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron_str UTP
institution UTP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/1/license.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1542/2/PENSAR+CINEMA.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
f3f78851c2e084153c90f873d7ba9910
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv TEDE
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tede@utp.br
_version_ 1623392711307427840