MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade Coimbra, Rosicley
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599
Resumo: This article aims a reflection about the terms mimesis, created by Aristotle and literariness created by Russian formalists. While in Aristotle mimesis comes (erroneously) synonym of imitation, being too a pillar of theory of literature, on the other hand literariness shows off as an study of all that turns a certain work literary. However, sketching an trajectory of their evolution we note that mimesis and literariness concern in some aspects: they worry about the literary object once that Aristotle didn’t define mimesis as being imitation of reality but being an imitation of men’s action, focusing his worrying into poièsis, in other words in poetic make, as the Russian formalists made changing the investigation angle to literary work itself.
id Unioeste-1_edcf4a5bbe6551f4591b5fd0c1fec417
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/3599
network_acronym_str Unioeste-1
network_name_str Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORYMIMESIS E LITERARIEDADE: (ESBOÇO DE UM) PERCURSO INVESTIGATIVOMimesisLiterariedadePercurso investigativo This article aims a reflection about the terms mimesis, created by Aristotle and literariness created by Russian formalists. While in Aristotle mimesis comes (erroneously) synonym of imitation, being too a pillar of theory of literature, on the other hand literariness shows off as an study of all that turns a certain work literary. However, sketching an trajectory of their evolution we note that mimesis and literariness concern in some aspects: they worry about the literary object once that Aristotle didn’t define mimesis as being imitation of reality but being an imitation of men’s action, focusing his worrying into poièsis, in other words in poetic make, as the Russian formalists made changing the investigation angle to literary work itself. O objetivo deste artigo é tecer uma reflexão acerca dos termos mimesis, criado por Aristóteles, e literariedade, cunhado pelos Formalistas russos. Enquanto em Aristóteles mimesis tornou-se (erroneamente) sinônimo de imitação, sendo também um dos pilares da teoria da literatura, a literariedade, por outro lado, manifesta-se como o estudo daquilo que torna uma dada obra como sendo literária. Contudo, traçando um percurso da evolução de ambos nota-se que mimesis e literariedade tangenciam-se em alguns aspectos: como a preocupação com o objeto literário, uma vez que o próprio Aristóteles não definiu a mimesis como sendo a imitação da realidade, mas sim como imitação das ações dos homens, focando sua preocupação na poièsis, ou seja, no fazer poético, assim como procederam os formalistas russos ao deslocar o ângulo de investigação para a obra literária em si.Unioeste2010-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599Travessias; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)Travessias; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010)Travessias; v. 4 n. 1 (2010)1982-5935reponame:Travessias (Cascavel. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)instacron:Unioesteporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599/2856Copyright (c) 2010 Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com indicação da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade Coimbra, Rosicley2020-12-08T11:43:08Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/3599Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessiasPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/oairevista.travessias@unioeste.br1982-59351982-5935opendoar:2020-12-08T11:43:08Travessias (Cascavel. Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
MIMESIS E LITERARIEDADE: (ESBOÇO DE UM) PERCURSO INVESTIGATIVO
title MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
spellingShingle MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
Andrade Coimbra, Rosicley
Mimesis
Literariedade
Percurso investigativo
title_short MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
title_full MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
title_fullStr MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
title_full_unstemmed MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
title_sort MIMESIS AND LITERARINESS: (SKETCH OF AN) INVESTIGATIVE TRAJECTORY
author Andrade Coimbra, Rosicley
author_facet Andrade Coimbra, Rosicley
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade Coimbra, Rosicley
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mimesis
Literariedade
Percurso investigativo
topic Mimesis
Literariedade
Percurso investigativo
description This article aims a reflection about the terms mimesis, created by Aristotle and literariness created by Russian formalists. While in Aristotle mimesis comes (erroneously) synonym of imitation, being too a pillar of theory of literature, on the other hand literariness shows off as an study of all that turns a certain work literary. However, sketching an trajectory of their evolution we note that mimesis and literariness concern in some aspects: they worry about the literary object once that Aristotle didn’t define mimesis as being imitation of reality but being an imitation of men’s action, focusing his worrying into poièsis, in other words in poetic make, as the Russian formalists made changing the investigation angle to literary work itself.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3599/2856
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unioeste
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unioeste
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Travessias; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)
Travessias; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010)
Travessias; v. 4 n. 1 (2010)
1982-5935
reponame:Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
instacron:Unioeste
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
instacron_str Unioeste
institution Unioeste
reponame_str Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
collection Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Travessias (Cascavel. Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.travessias@unioeste.br
_version_ 1798044916163543040

Registros relacionados