Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09 |
Resumo: | The acquisition of writing skills requires a whole academic lifetime, but students should already reach acceptable levels of proficiency in compulsory education. This research article examines the beginner, intermediate and advanced levels of writing skills in the Spanish educational system. It compares the development of knowledge and its associated difficulties in different school years by interviewing 40 students from the even years of primary and secondary education. This study follows the theoretical framework of Hayes and Flower (1980), as amended and restated by Hayes (1996). After classifying the students’ statements based on the theoretical model used, descriptive and correlational analyses were applied. They revealed an unexpected stagnation, depending on the level, with important educational implications. The first instance of stagnation is seen during the intermediate years of primary education; the second one is observed during subsequent years, which means the expected development does not take place. However, even with this limitation, the students showed a greater evolution in the development of writing competencies than in the overcoming of difficulties and deficiencies. Generally, the development in writing operations does not correlate with the overcoming of difficulties and shortcomings. We identified some expected correlations in isolated cases (the greater the skills, the smaller the difficulties), but surprisingly the opposite was also true (the greater the skills, the greater the difficulties). The educational implications are obvious and important. Not only should schools further develop the students’ writing patterns throughout the primary and secondary years in order to improve their writing skills, they should also work towards mitigating the common deficiencies and difficulties.Keywords: writing, basic education, progress, difficulties. |
id |
Unisinos-3_62c002e7baa8e36ba3bebcab103b0c8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/10527 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality?Aprendiendo a escribir durante la enseñanza obligatoria ¿deseo o realidad?The acquisition of writing skills requires a whole academic lifetime, but students should already reach acceptable levels of proficiency in compulsory education. This research article examines the beginner, intermediate and advanced levels of writing skills in the Spanish educational system. It compares the development of knowledge and its associated difficulties in different school years by interviewing 40 students from the even years of primary and secondary education. This study follows the theoretical framework of Hayes and Flower (1980), as amended and restated by Hayes (1996). After classifying the students’ statements based on the theoretical model used, descriptive and correlational analyses were applied. They revealed an unexpected stagnation, depending on the level, with important educational implications. The first instance of stagnation is seen during the intermediate years of primary education; the second one is observed during subsequent years, which means the expected development does not take place. However, even with this limitation, the students showed a greater evolution in the development of writing competencies than in the overcoming of difficulties and deficiencies. Generally, the development in writing operations does not correlate with the overcoming of difficulties and shortcomings. We identified some expected correlations in isolated cases (the greater the skills, the smaller the difficulties), but surprisingly the opposite was also true (the greater the skills, the greater the difficulties). The educational implications are obvious and important. Not only should schools further develop the students’ writing patterns throughout the primary and secondary years in order to improve their writing skills, they should also work towards mitigating the common deficiencies and difficulties.Keywords: writing, basic education, progress, difficulties.Adquirir la competencia escritora conlleva toda una vida académica, pero sus niveles aceptables de dominio deberían cubrirse con la educación obligatoria. Esta investigación verifica los niveles de partida, intermedios y de llegada de esta competencia en el sistema educativo español, contrastando la evolución tanto del dominio como de sus dificultades y deficiencias, con 40 alumnos entrevistados de cursos pares de primaria y secundaria. Para ello, su arquitectura teórica es el modelo de Hayes y Flower (1980), modificado y reformulado por Hayes (1996). Tras codificar las declaraciones del alumnado, según el modelo teórico aludido, se aplicaron análisis descriptivos y correlacionales, que revelaron un relativo progreso pero también un sorprendente estancamiento, según niveles, con implicaciones educativas trascendentes. El primero se observa durante los cursos intermedios de Educación Primaria; el segundo a partir de éstos, luego no se produce el desarrollo que cabría esperarse. Con esta limitación, igualmente se observó más evolución en el desarrollo competencial para la expresión escrita que en la superación de deficiencias y dificultades en la misma; no existiendo generalmente correlación entre ellas: esto es, el desarrollo de las operaciones para la escritura no se corresponde con la superación de dificultades y deficiencias. De manera aislada se han detectado algunas correlaciones en el sentido esperado (a mayor competencia menores deficiencias), pero sorprendentemente también ha acontecido lo contrario (a mayor competencia mayores dificultades). Las implicaciones didácticas son evidentes e importantes. No solo se requiere seguir desarrollando el patrón de escritura durante todo el periodo de escolarización obligatoria para la mejora competencial de la misma, sino que es preciso trabajar en paralelo para mitigar las deficiencias y dificultades frecuentes.Palabras clave: expresión escrita, educación obligatoria, progreso, dificultades.Unisinos2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09Calidoscópio; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2017): January/April; 106-125Calidoscópio; v. 15 n. 1 (2017): janeiro/abril; 106-1252177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosspahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09/5998Rodríguez Fuentes, AntonioGallego Ortega, José Luisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-16T19:14:20Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/10527Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2017-06-16T19:14:20Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? Aprendiendo a escribir durante la enseñanza obligatoria ¿deseo o realidad? |
title |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
spellingShingle |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? Rodríguez Fuentes, Antonio |
title_short |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
title_full |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
title_fullStr |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
title_sort |
Learning to write during primary and secondary school: Wishful thinking or reality? |
author |
Rodríguez Fuentes, Antonio |
author_facet |
Rodríguez Fuentes, Antonio Gallego Ortega, José Luis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gallego Ortega, José Luis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez Fuentes, Antonio Gallego Ortega, José Luis |
description |
The acquisition of writing skills requires a whole academic lifetime, but students should already reach acceptable levels of proficiency in compulsory education. This research article examines the beginner, intermediate and advanced levels of writing skills in the Spanish educational system. It compares the development of knowledge and its associated difficulties in different school years by interviewing 40 students from the even years of primary and secondary education. This study follows the theoretical framework of Hayes and Flower (1980), as amended and restated by Hayes (1996). After classifying the students’ statements based on the theoretical model used, descriptive and correlational analyses were applied. They revealed an unexpected stagnation, depending on the level, with important educational implications. The first instance of stagnation is seen during the intermediate years of primary education; the second one is observed during subsequent years, which means the expected development does not take place. However, even with this limitation, the students showed a greater evolution in the development of writing competencies than in the overcoming of difficulties and deficiencies. Generally, the development in writing operations does not correlate with the overcoming of difficulties and shortcomings. We identified some expected correlations in isolated cases (the greater the skills, the smaller the difficulties), but surprisingly the opposite was also true (the greater the skills, the greater the difficulties). The educational implications are obvious and important. Not only should schools further develop the students’ writing patterns throughout the primary and secondary years in order to improve their writing skills, they should also work towards mitigating the common deficiencies and difficulties.Keywords: writing, basic education, progress, difficulties. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.151.09/5998 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2017): January/April; 106-125 Calidoscópio; v. 15 n. 1 (2017): janeiro/abril; 106-125 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203886680866816 |