Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867 |
Resumo: | This study analyzes misunderstandings in dialogues, based on concepts developed by Carel and Ducrot in the Theory of Semantic Blocks. This theory proposes to allocate as “meaning” to a linguistic entity a set of donc sequences and pourtant sequences and postulates two ways by which an argumentative aspect can be linked to the words whose meaning it constitutes: the external, sequences that precede or follow the entity, and the internal, sequences that paraphrase it. Assuming the notion of discursive argumentation, two dialogues were analyzed. We concluded that the misunderstanding is due to the fact that the interlocutors linked different linguistic argumentations to a single entity, producing, then, different objects of speech. Key words: semantic block, argumentative sequence, misunderstanding, semantic argumentative. |
id |
Unisinos-3_8d3d680cbdc09f0dc4a919e999d06d3a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/4867 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialoguesAnálise de mal-entendidos em diálogosThis study analyzes misunderstandings in dialogues, based on concepts developed by Carel and Ducrot in the Theory of Semantic Blocks. This theory proposes to allocate as “meaning” to a linguistic entity a set of donc sequences and pourtant sequences and postulates two ways by which an argumentative aspect can be linked to the words whose meaning it constitutes: the external, sequences that precede or follow the entity, and the internal, sequences that paraphrase it. Assuming the notion of discursive argumentation, two dialogues were analyzed. We concluded that the misunderstanding is due to the fact that the interlocutors linked different linguistic argumentations to a single entity, producing, then, different objects of speech. Key words: semantic block, argumentative sequence, misunderstanding, semantic argumentative.O trabalho analisa mal-entendidos em diálogos, com base em conceitos desenvolvidos por Carel e Ducrot na Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos (TBS). A TBS propõe que se atribua como “sentido” a uma entidade linguística um conjunto de encadeamentos argumentativos em DC (portanto) e em PT (mesmo assim) e postula dois modos pelos quais um aspecto argumentativo pode estar associado às palavras cujo sentido ele (o aspecto) constitui: o externo, encadeamentos que precedem ou seguem a entidade; e o interno, encadeamentos que a parafraseiam. Assumindo essa noção de argumentação discursiva, foram analisados dois diálogos. Concluiu-se que a incompreensão se deve ao fato de os interlocutores associarem a uma mesma entidade linguística argumentações diferentes, produzindo, então, objetos de discurso diversos. Palavras-chave: bloco semântico, encadeamento argumentativo, malentendido, semântica argumentativa.Unisinos2021-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867Calidoscópio; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2009): May/August; 155-160Calidoscópio; v. 7 n. 2 (2009): Maio/Agosto; 155-1602177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867/2123Copyright (c) 2021 Calidoscópioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraeff, Telisa FurlanettoCostenaro, Silvane2021-05-27T19:37:12Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/4867Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2021-05-27T19:37:12Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues Análise de mal-entendidos em diálogos |
title |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues Graeff, Telisa Furlanetto |
title_short |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
title_full |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
title_sort |
Analysis of misunderstandings in dialogues |
author |
Graeff, Telisa Furlanetto |
author_facet |
Graeff, Telisa Furlanetto Costenaro, Silvane |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costenaro, Silvane |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Graeff, Telisa Furlanetto Costenaro, Silvane |
description |
This study analyzes misunderstandings in dialogues, based on concepts developed by Carel and Ducrot in the Theory of Semantic Blocks. This theory proposes to allocate as “meaning” to a linguistic entity a set of donc sequences and pourtant sequences and postulates two ways by which an argumentative aspect can be linked to the words whose meaning it constitutes: the external, sequences that precede or follow the entity, and the internal, sequences that paraphrase it. Assuming the notion of discursive argumentation, two dialogues were analyzed. We concluded that the misunderstanding is due to the fact that the interlocutors linked different linguistic argumentations to a single entity, producing, then, different objects of speech. Key words: semantic block, argumentative sequence, misunderstanding, semantic argumentative. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/4867/2123 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Calidoscópio info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Calidoscópio |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2009): May/August; 155-160 Calidoscópio; v. 7 n. 2 (2009): Maio/Agosto; 155-160 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203885661650944 |