Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Contextos Clínicos |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01 |
Resumo: | This review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme. |
id |
Unisinos-4_a46645786a0b73ba671450d56ed6941d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12120 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-4 |
network_name_str |
Contextos Clínicos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literatureQualidade metodológica de programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas na América Latina: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaThis review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme.Esta revisão sintetizou sistematicamente informações sobre programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas, para adultos, conduzidos na América Latina, e resumiu o atual corpo de evidências disponíveis sobre a qualidade metodológica, eficácia e/ou efetividade desses programas, bem como as implicações dos resultados para futuras pesquisas e práticas baseadas em evidências em Psicologia. Buscas foram feitas nos bancos Medline, Scopus e PsycINFO (sem restrição cronológica) por artigos empíricos sobre programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas. Ao todo, 15 estudos foram incluídos e avaliados quanto à qualidade metodológica. As intervenções selecionadas focaram em assertividade, empatia, enfrentamento positivo do estresse, perdão, gratidão, otimismo e resiliência. Os resultados revelaram que 100% dos estudos identificou algum tipo de efeito positivo após a intervenção. No entanto, a qualidade metodológica dos estudos mostrou uma variedade de falhas. Apenas 46% dos estudos alcançou alta qualidade, e dois estudos utilizaram delineamento experimental (randomização). Implicações para futuras pesquisas sobre avaliação de resultados de intervenção são discutidas. Palavras-chave: psicologia positiva, qualidade metodológica, programa de intervenção.Unisinos2017-07-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.0110.4013/ctc.2017.101.01Contextos Clínicos; v. 10 n. 1 (2017): Jan-Jun; 2-221983-3482reponame:Contextos Clínicosinstname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosenghttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01/6038Durgante, Helen Bedinotoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-13T18:42:18Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12120Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicosPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/oaidfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br1983-34821983-3482opendoar:2017-07-13T18:42:18Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature Qualidade metodológica de programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas na América Latina: uma revisão sistemática da literatura |
title |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature Durgante, Helen Bedinoto |
title_short |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
title_full |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
title_sort |
Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature |
author |
Durgante, Helen Bedinoto |
author_facet |
Durgante, Helen Bedinoto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Durgante, Helen Bedinoto |
description |
This review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01 10.4013/ctc.2017.101.01 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4013/ctc.2017.101.01 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01/6038 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contextos Clínicos; v. 10 n. 1 (2017): Jan-Jun; 2-22 1983-3482 reponame:Contextos Clínicos instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Contextos Clínicos |
collection |
Contextos Clínicos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1797240151561207808 |