Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Durgante, Helen Bedinoto
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contextos Clínicos
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01
Resumo: This review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme.
id Unisinos-4_a46645786a0b73ba671450d56ed6941d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12120
network_acronym_str Unisinos-4
network_name_str Contextos Clínicos
repository_id_str
spelling Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literatureQualidade metodológica de programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas na América Latina: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaThis review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme.Esta revisão sintetizou sistematicamente informações sobre programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas, para adultos, conduzidos na América Latina, e resumiu o atual corpo de evidências disponíveis sobre a qualidade metodológica, eficácia e/ou efetividade desses programas, bem como as implicações dos resultados para futuras pesquisas e práticas baseadas em evidências em Psicologia. Buscas foram feitas nos bancos Medline, Scopus e PsycINFO (sem restrição cronológica) por artigos empíricos sobre programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas. Ao todo, 15 estudos foram incluídos e avaliados quanto à qualidade metodológica. As intervenções selecionadas focaram em assertividade, empatia, enfrentamento positivo do estresse, perdão, gratidão, otimismo e resiliência. Os resultados revelaram que 100% dos estudos identificou algum tipo de efeito positivo após a intervenção. No entanto, a qualidade metodológica dos estudos mostrou uma variedade de falhas. Apenas 46% dos estudos alcançou alta qualidade, e dois estudos utilizaram delineamento experimental (randomização). Implicações para futuras pesquisas sobre avaliação de resultados de intervenção são discutidas. Palavras-chave: psicologia positiva, qualidade metodológica, programa de intervenção.Unisinos2017-07-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.0110.4013/ctc.2017.101.01Contextos Clínicos; v. 10 n. 1 (2017): Jan-Jun; 2-221983-3482reponame:Contextos Clínicosinstname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosenghttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01/6038Durgante, Helen Bedinotoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-13T18:42:18Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12120Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicosPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/oaidfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br1983-34821983-3482opendoar:2017-07-13T18:42:18Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
Qualidade metodológica de programas de intervenção baseados em fortalezas na América Latina: uma revisão sistemática da literatura
title Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
spellingShingle Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
Durgante, Helen Bedinoto
title_short Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
title_full Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
title_sort Methodological quality of strength-based intervention programmes in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature
author Durgante, Helen Bedinoto
author_facet Durgante, Helen Bedinoto
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Durgante, Helen Bedinoto
description This review systematically synthesised information of strengthen-based intervention programmes for adults conducted in Latin America, and summarized the current body of evidence available about the methodological quality, efficacy and/or effectiveness of these programmes, as well as implications of the findings for future research and evidence-based practices in Psychology. Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO databases (no chronological window restriction) were searched for empirical work on strengthen-based interventions programme. Overall, 15 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality. The interventions selected focused on assertiveness, empathy, coping, forgiveness, gratitude, optimism and resilience. The results revealed that 100% of the studies identified some kind of positive effect after intervention. However, methodological quality of studies showed a variety of pitfalls. Only 46% of studies achieved high quality and two studies applied experimental design (randomization). Implications for future research on intervention outcome assessment are discussed. Keywords: positive psychology, methodological quality, intervention programme.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01
10.4013/ctc.2017.101.01
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01
identifier_str_mv 10.4013/ctc.2017.101.01
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2017.101.01/6038
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contextos Clínicos; v. 10 n. 1 (2017): Jan-Jun; 2-22
1983-3482
reponame:Contextos Clínicos
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:Unisinos
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str Unisinos
institution Unisinos
reponame_str Contextos Clínicos
collection Contextos Clínicos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br
_version_ 1797240151561207808