Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo,Vlamir F de
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Abboud,Antônio Carlos de S, Carmo,Margarida Goréte F do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Horticultura Brasileira
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362010000400002
Resumo: The effects of branch number and plant densities on organically grown cherry tomato yield and fruit quality were studied. Labor costs for pruning were also assessed. The essay was conducted at the experimental fields of the Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from September 2004 to January 2005. A factorial design was used combining three row spacings (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m), two cherry tomato cultivars (hybrid 'Super-Sweet' and a local self pollinated 'Perinha') and three pruning regimes (free growth, one branch per plant and two branches per plant). The row spacing treatment of 0.6 x 1.5 m resulted in lower number of fruits when compared to the 0.4 x 1.5 m treatment, however, producing fruits with higher individual average mass, which resulted in similar final yield. These yields were higher than the 0.8 m treatment. Yield increases due to the higher number of plants per area were mostly due to the increase of fruit number, which compensated for the decrease of fruit size and mass. The 'free growth' treatment yielded similarly to the two branches per plant treatment. The labor costs were lower under 'free growth' due to the absence of pruning. Both cultivars responded similarly to plant population and pruning regimes.
id ABH-1_1a9b24f3c2640d0e0a108416ca46588b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-05362010000400002
network_acronym_str ABH-1
network_name_str Horticultura Brasileira
repository_id_str
spelling Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomatoLycopersicon esculentumnumber of brancheslabor costsThe effects of branch number and plant densities on organically grown cherry tomato yield and fruit quality were studied. Labor costs for pruning were also assessed. The essay was conducted at the experimental fields of the Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from September 2004 to January 2005. A factorial design was used combining three row spacings (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m), two cherry tomato cultivars (hybrid 'Super-Sweet' and a local self pollinated 'Perinha') and three pruning regimes (free growth, one branch per plant and two branches per plant). The row spacing treatment of 0.6 x 1.5 m resulted in lower number of fruits when compared to the 0.4 x 1.5 m treatment, however, producing fruits with higher individual average mass, which resulted in similar final yield. These yields were higher than the 0.8 m treatment. Yield increases due to the higher number of plants per area were mostly due to the increase of fruit number, which compensated for the decrease of fruit size and mass. The 'free growth' treatment yielded similarly to the two branches per plant treatment. The labor costs were lower under 'free growth' due to the absence of pruning. Both cultivars responded similarly to plant population and pruning regimes.Associação Brasileira de Horticultura2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362010000400002Horticultura Brasileira v.28 n.4 2010reponame:Horticultura Brasileirainstname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)instacron:ABH10.1590/S0102-05362010000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo,Vlamir F deAbboud,Antônio Carlos de SCarmo,Margarida Goréte F doeng2011-01-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-05362010000400002Revistahttp://cms.horticulturabrasileira.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||hortbras@gmail.com1806-99910102-0536opendoar:2011-01-17T00:00Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
title Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
spellingShingle Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
Azevedo,Vlamir F de
Lycopersicon esculentum
number of branches
labor costs
title_short Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
title_full Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
title_fullStr Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
title_full_unstemmed Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
title_sort Row spacing and pruning regimes on organically grown cherry tomato
author Azevedo,Vlamir F de
author_facet Azevedo,Vlamir F de
Abboud,Antônio Carlos de S
Carmo,Margarida Goréte F do
author_role author
author2 Abboud,Antônio Carlos de S
Carmo,Margarida Goréte F do
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo,Vlamir F de
Abboud,Antônio Carlos de S
Carmo,Margarida Goréte F do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lycopersicon esculentum
number of branches
labor costs
topic Lycopersicon esculentum
number of branches
labor costs
description The effects of branch number and plant densities on organically grown cherry tomato yield and fruit quality were studied. Labor costs for pruning were also assessed. The essay was conducted at the experimental fields of the Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from September 2004 to January 2005. A factorial design was used combining three row spacings (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m), two cherry tomato cultivars (hybrid 'Super-Sweet' and a local self pollinated 'Perinha') and three pruning regimes (free growth, one branch per plant and two branches per plant). The row spacing treatment of 0.6 x 1.5 m resulted in lower number of fruits when compared to the 0.4 x 1.5 m treatment, however, producing fruits with higher individual average mass, which resulted in similar final yield. These yields were higher than the 0.8 m treatment. Yield increases due to the higher number of plants per area were mostly due to the increase of fruit number, which compensated for the decrease of fruit size and mass. The 'free growth' treatment yielded similarly to the two branches per plant treatment. The labor costs were lower under 'free growth' due to the absence of pruning. Both cultivars responded similarly to plant population and pruning regimes.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362010000400002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362010000400002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-05362010000400002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Horticultura Brasileira v.28 n.4 2010
reponame:Horticultura Brasileira
instname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
instacron:ABH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
instacron_str ABH
institution ABH
reponame_str Horticultura Brasileira
collection Horticultura Brasileira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||hortbras@gmail.com
_version_ 1754213080754028544